Illegal Demolition Method Used in Fatal Miami Beach Building Collapse, Lawsuit Says
A 42-year-old construction worker died weeks after the building collapsed during demolition.
April 03, 2019 at 10:09 AM
5 minute read
The owner and contractors on a Miami Beach building that collapsed during demolition were accused in a worker's wrongful death suit of using an illegal work method when the structure crashed in a plume of dust and debris.
The Marlborough House was being torn down last July 23 to make way for a high-end development when the 13-story structure collapsed next to Collins Avenue.
Samuel Landis, who was working on the project, was struck by debris and died Aug. 3 from his injuries, the lawsuit claims.
Landis' mother, Judith Landis, on Monday sued affiliates of the owner and developer as well as the contractors, alleging they were using an implosion method after the city denied an implosion permit and prohibits implosion demolitions altogether.
Two subcontractors started demolishing the building by pulling out first-floor support structures with chains and a front-end loader, essentially pulling “the legs out from underneath the building,” according to the Miami-Dade Circuit Court complaint.
“This intended plan was not authorized by the city but was illegally authorized and/or approved by all of the defendants, who collectively agreed that it was to be performed surreptitiously, in contumacious disregard of the city of Miami Beach ordinances,” attorney Steven Osber wrote in the complaint. This was done “because it was a 'quicker and cheaper' method of demolition.”
Osber is a senior partner at Conrad & Scherer in Fort Lauderdale.
Developer Multiplan Real Estate Asset Management, whose affiliates are named as defendants, on Tuesday expressed its sympathy and sorrow for the Landis family but didn't address specifics of the lawsuit.
“This was a terrible tragedy. Our hearts remain with the Landis family over their loss,” Multiplan managing partner Marcelo Kingston said in an emailed statement.
The complaint names Miami Beach Associates LLC, which owns the 1.5-acre site at 5775 Collins Ave., and MREAM LLC as defendants. Both are affiliates of Multiplan, according to the state Division of Corporations.
Miami Beach Associates applied for a city demolition permit using an implosion technique, but the city denied the permit several times. The city approved a demolition permit using conventional methods, according to the complaint.
Under the permit, crews should have started from the top of the building and worked their way down using a crane or other equipment, the complaint said. An implosion could be done either using explosives or by removing parts of the structure to trigger an inward collapse of the building.
Kingston directed further inquiries to the general contractor, saying it oversaw the demolition.
General contractor Winmar Construction Inc. hired subcontractor AlliedBean Demolition Inc., based in Fort Lauderdale, for the demolition job.
Winmar, AlliedBean and AlliedBean president Kevin Bean are named defendants.
Winmar's attorney, Peterson, Baldor & Marange managing partner Michael Peterson in Miami, responded to a request for comment but did not provide one by deadline.
Bean and AlliedBean didn't return a request for comment by deadline.
The complaint also alleged some of the defendants didn't use proper safety precautions. AlliedBean encouraged spectators to watch the demolition that morning as a business marketing tactic, but no safety barriers or safety traffic procedures were in place, according to the complaint.
Safety & Risk Solutions LLC, a Lake-Worth-based subcontractor hired to provide safety and accident prevention services, also is a named defendant.
Company president Philip Nanna said that 13 safety reviews were done at the Marlborough House before the demolition, but that his company wasn't present during the demolition.
Safety & Risk Solutions is the safety review subcontractor on all of Winmar's project sites, Nanna said, adding that his company still hasn't been served with the complaint.
He also pointed out that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration investigated the collapse and the demolition subcontractor.
The remaining defendants are AlliedBean subcontractor AA Demolition Management LLC and Alan Wackes, who is alleged to have worked as qualifying agent for AlliedBean, also was sued. The Daily Business Review was unable to reach Wackes and AA Demolition Management.
Osber, the filing attorney, on Tuesday maintained the defendants proceeded with a dangerous, illegal demolition method.
“The most egregious violation would be engaging in a construction practice that is so blatantly dangerous to the general public without regard for the laws of the city of Miami Beach or generally accepted construction practices,” he said.
Related stories:
Implosion or Not? Lawsuits Likely Over Miami Beach Building Collapse
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250