Miami Lawyers Clinch $49 Million Settlement With GE Capital Over Petters Ponzi Scheme
GE Capital was initially a victim of the third-largest Ponzi scheme in history, but attorneys Michael Budwick and Solomon Genet claimed the bank became a co-conspirator after seeing a way to get its money back.
April 05, 2019 at 12:01 PM
5 minute read
After eight years of investigation and litigation, Michael S. Budwick and Solomon B. Genet of Meland Russin & Budwick in Miami negotiated a $49 million settlement agreement with General Electric Capital Corp. over claims the Boston-based lender became a co-conspirator in one of the biggest Ponzi schemes in history.
The win stems from a Florida bankruptcy case, in which Budwick and Genet represent Barry E. Mukamal, trustee for two Florida hedge funds — Palm Beach Finance Partners L.P. and Palm Beach Finance II L.P. — down $651 million after lending it to businessman Tom Petters.
Between 1995 and 2008, Petters ran a $3.65 billion scheme, using fake documents to convince investors to help buy overstocked electronics to sell to retailers. Petters claimed wholesale giant Costco was his main customer — only it wasn't.
Upon discovery in 2008, it was the biggest scam the world had seen. Shortly after, Bernie Madoff and Allen Stanford took the top spots. Petters was convicted, sentenced to 50 years in prison, and his business, Petters Group Worldwide, fell into bankruptcy in Minneapolis.
The Palm Beach hedge funds suffered a third of overall losses, so Budwick and Genet traveled the country meeting with victims and perpetrators to pinpoint liability, filing more than 150 lawsuits to claw back lost money.
Most settled, but one wouldn't go away. Though GE Capital was a victim, Budwick and Genet found it discovered Petters' scam in 2000 but told no one, allegedly on the condition it would be repaid by new, unwitting investors. According to Budwick, GE Capital wrote a recommendation letter Petters used to recruit fresh marks.
GE declined to comment, but denied it joined the fraud and moved to dismiss based on lack of evidence and standing.
Meanwhile, it wasn't easy coordinating depositions of 13 experts and 68 witnesses, many of whom were locked up nationwide, according to Budwick, who said he was barely home.
“I literally had one of those desktop calendars where I would rip off each of the months, and I had them pasted on the walls of my office through all of 2016, where we were identifying which witnesses were in which cities and the logistics of when we could get to each deposition,” Budwick said.
GE ultimately withdrew its lack of evidence argument, and the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ruled Budwick's client had standing to sue.
“In a case like this, the only way you can be successful is to be very aggressive,” Budwick said.
Budwick wasn't the only lawyer after GE Capital over its Petters link, but he was the only one to succeed. Three similar lawsuits in New York, Chicago and Minnesota followed Budwick's but flopped, even though investors in those cases had lost about $400 million.
“GE Capital has excellent lawyers and they were able to convince those others courts that it was the trustees for Petters' company that had the standing to sue GE Capital, even though we had prevailed before the bankruptcy judge,” Budwick said. “It's unfortunate that they recovered nothing but we're pleased that we were able to get such a large recovery, given their lack of success.”
Defense counsel Sean Berkowitz and Miles Ruthberg of Latham & Watkins in Chicago and New York did not respond to requests for comment.
Budwick and his team began investigating on a contingency fee in 2011 and haven't been paid yet. Attorney fees total about $18.6 million — 33% of the $49 million settlement for the case, then another 5% for a related appeal. Budwick's firm would get the lion's share, about $14.2 million or 29% of the settlement amount, with co-counsel at two other firms receiving the remaining 9%.
This means co-counsel from Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton would get $2.94 million, and Mandel & Mandel $1.47 million.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Erik P. Kimball will hold a hearing on approving the settlement May 2.
If ratified, the $49 million will boost the $170 million recovered in the case so far. One final $9 million clawback suit remains for the Florida hedge funds, which are also the second biggest creditors in Petters' Minnesota bankruptcy case. Trustee Mukamal sits on a creditors' committee there, making decisions while Budwick manages litigation as oversight counsel.
Read the motion:
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllArt of the Settlement: Trump Attorney Reveals Strategy in ABC Lawsuit
Nurse Awarded $2.3M in Orlando Crash Case After Declining $50K Settlement Offer
Trump, ABC News Settle Defamation Lawsuit Before Depositions
Trending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-85
- 3Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 4Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 5Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250