Broward County Clerk of Courts Brenda Forman Under Investigation for Alleged False Statements
Miami-Dade State Attorney Katherine Fernandez Rundle is looking into allegations that Broward County Clerk of Courts Brenda Forman gave three different organizations false descriptions of encounters between her and Oakland Park criminal defense attorney William Gelin.
April 08, 2019 at 02:16 PM
4 minute read
The Miami-Dade State Attorney's Office is investigating complaints against Broward County Clerk of Courts Brenda Forman, including an allegation she made false statements under oath, after South Florida attorney and courthouse blogger William Gelin showed prosecutors sworn statements Forman made against him in 2018, alleging he stalked her in the courthouse.
State Attorney Michael J. Satz recused himself from any investigation, as Forman used to work for his office. Instead, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis requested Miami-Dade State Attorney Katherine Fernandez Rundle take the baton and she obliged, according to an executive order Friday.
DeSantis' order said Forman is accused of giving three different organizations false descriptions of encounters between her and Oakland Park criminal defense attorney Gelin. The order also referenced two other complaints involving falsifying documents, but did not elaborate.
Forman's office did not respond to requests for comment by deadline.
Gelin writes for courthouse blog J.A.A.B. Blog and first clashed with Forman in October 2018, according to court documents, when he sought help with a client issue and was allegedly instructed to refer to her as “Ms. Forman”or “Madam Clerk” instead of Brenda.
When Gelin then tried to snap a picture of Forman for his blog, she objected and filed a domestic violence complaint in Broward Circuit Court. The complaint claimed Gelin had violated her rights by repeatedly harassing and stalking her through the courthouse, and asked the court to keep Gelin at a 500 feet distance.
In December 2018, Forman filed a Florida Bar complaint against Gelin, claiming he was “giving the bar a bad name” with harassment that she alleged posed a significant threat to her.
Gelin would not comment on the case, but has consistently labeled both complaints baseless and untrue, arguing the First Amendment protects his actions, which weren't malicious.
Gelin moved for sanctions against Forman in the stalking case, which she dropped without explanation in January. However, Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Bill Altfield mysteriously kept a Jan 31. hearing in place until Forman moved to cancel it.
Soon after, Gelin released video footage of the encounters that he claims contradicts her version of events. One video shows Forman asking her staff to get Gelin away from her as she's “going to file a domestic violence charge on him,” while others show surveillance footage of Forman and Gelin's courthouse movements.
Gelin has used his blog for at least 14 negative posts about Forman since December 2018, provoking a slew of scathing and gossipy comments from readers. He also published embossed invitations to the Jan. 31 hearing before it was canceled, and has told the Sun Sentinel that he intended “to draw as much attention and as many people as possible to the hearing so the people of Broward County could watch one of their elected officials testify under oath in open court to events directly contradicted by video evidence.”
Forman's bar complaint against Gelin is pending.
Gelin published a blog post Friday that Forman was “in over her head.” He also implied Forman was trying to stave off attempts to change an amendment approved by voters, which puts her at the helm of county funds.
Forman was elected to her post in 2016, when her then-husband and Broward County Clerk of Courts Howard Forman retired and endorsed her as his replacement.
By March 2017, the pair was embroiled in a bitter divorce and Forman moved for control of his estate, claiming he'd shown signs of early onset dementia and wasn't mentally capable of overseeing it. But Broward Circuit Judge Mark Speiser blocked Brenda Forman's claim to the estate, ruling she'd acted in bad faith.
In March, Howard Forman launched a surprise bid to run against his ex-wife for the Broward clerkship in 2020.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCOVID-19 Death Suit Against Nursing Home Sent to State Court, 11th Circuit Affirms
Year-End Tax Planning: How Real Estate Investors Can Leverage Qualified Opportunity Funds
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250