Ex-Broward Sheriff's Appeal Against Gov. DeSantis Certified to Florida Supreme Court
Former Broward Sheriff Scott Israel argues his case against Gov. Ron DeSantis should first go to Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal, before heading to the state's high court.
April 09, 2019 at 03:38 PM
4 minute read
The Florida Supreme Court might soon be deciding whether Gov. Ron DeSantis abused his gubernatorial powers by removing former Broward Sheriff Scott Israel from office over the law enforcement office's handling of the Parkland school mass shooting.
Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal issued an order on Tuesday certifying Israel's lawsuit against DeSantis for review by the high court. The appellate court's order referred to the matter as “one which requires immediate resolution by the Florida Supreme Court because the issues pending in this District Court of Appeal are of great public importance.”
The case reached the Fourth DCA after Israel appealed Broward Circuit Judge David Haimes' dismissal of the complaint on Thursday. Haimes wrote DeSantis' executive order stripping Israel of his office was “consistent with the Florida Constitution and general principles of separation of powers, which grant the governor the authority to suspend an official, and grant the Florida Senate that exclusive authority to review the suspension and decide whether to remove or reinstate the official.”
The governor's legal counsel, Joe Jacquot and Nicholas Primrose, responded to the appeal by filing a motion suggesting the case be resolved by the Florida Supreme Court, rather than the Fourth DCA.
“There is a need for immediate resolution of this dispute by the Florida Supreme Court,” the filing said. “The issue is of great public importance and is likely to have a great effect on the proper administration of justice.”
Read the Fourth DCA's order:
The brief also cited the state Supreme Court's adjudication of a similar dispute involving DeSantis' ouster by executive order of another public official.
In that case, the high court granted expedited review and disposition to ex-Okaloosa County Schools Superintendent Mary Beth Jackson. Noting the similarity of Israel's and Jackson's allegations, the governor's attorneys asked justices to tackle both matters at the same time.
But Israel's counsel disagree that the former sheriff's case should bypass the district court of appeal. Miami attorney Benedict “Ben” Kuehne and Palm Beach Gardens litigator Stuart Kaplan instead filed a response contending their client's appeal ought to first go before the Fourth District Court of Appeal.
“Sheriff Israel suggests that Supreme Court review is premature at this time,” the filing said. “Instead, the legal issue involved can be better sharpened by this court's review in the first instance, especially since the appeal challenges the governor's limited constitutional authority to supplant the decision of Broward County voters, who overwhelmingly elected Sheriff Israel as their sheriff to serve until 2020. At issue in this appeal is the guarantee of the Florida Constitution that '[a]ll political power is inherent in the people.' ”
Kuehne and Kaplan also rebutted opposing counsel's attempt to consolidate Israel's case with Jackson's.
Jackson's suit “posits a significantly different jurisdictional question: Does the governor's suspension power allow the suspension of an elected official for conduct occurring before the elected official's current election?” their filing said. “In Sheriff Israel's situation, although the actions complained of by the governor occurred before the governor was elected, Sheriff Israel's actions in 2017 and 2018 are within the sheriff's current elected term of office.”
DeSantis' communications director Helen Aguirre Ferré did not respond to requests for comment by press time.
Kuehne told the Daily Business Review Tuesday that if the high court accepts jurisdiction, Israel would look “forward to a full evaluation of the governor's constitutional powers” and would expect the Florida Supreme Court to agree this was “a constitutional overreach” by DeSantis.
“As an appellate specialist I always welcome the opportunity to present challenging constitutional issues to the Florida Supreme Court,” Kuehne said. “We now have an important case that will be tested by a new version of the Florida Supreme Court, which makes the appeal even more exciting.”
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Trending Stories
- 1Litigators of the Week: A Trade Secret Win at the ITC for Viking Over Promising Potential Liver Drug
- 2Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 3'The Show Must Go On': Solo-GC-of-Year Kevin Colby Pulls Off Perpetual Juggling Act
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Match Group's Katie Dugan & Herrick's Carol Goodman
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Eric Wall, Executive VP, Syllo
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250