Ex-Broward Sheriff's Appeal Against Gov. DeSantis Certified to Florida Supreme Court
Former Broward Sheriff Scott Israel argues his case against Gov. Ron DeSantis should first go to Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal, before heading to the state's high court.
April 09, 2019 at 03:38 PM
4 minute read
The Florida Supreme Court might soon be deciding whether Gov. Ron DeSantis abused his gubernatorial powers by removing former Broward Sheriff Scott Israel from office over the law enforcement office's handling of the Parkland school mass shooting.
Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal issued an order on Tuesday certifying Israel's lawsuit against DeSantis for review by the high court. The appellate court's order referred to the matter as “one which requires immediate resolution by the Florida Supreme Court because the issues pending in this District Court of Appeal are of great public importance.”
The case reached the Fourth DCA after Israel appealed Broward Circuit Judge David Haimes' dismissal of the complaint on Thursday. Haimes wrote DeSantis' executive order stripping Israel of his office was “consistent with the Florida Constitution and general principles of separation of powers, which grant the governor the authority to suspend an official, and grant the Florida Senate that exclusive authority to review the suspension and decide whether to remove or reinstate the official.”
The governor's legal counsel, Joe Jacquot and Nicholas Primrose, responded to the appeal by filing a motion suggesting the case be resolved by the Florida Supreme Court, rather than the Fourth DCA.
“There is a need for immediate resolution of this dispute by the Florida Supreme Court,” the filing said. “The issue is of great public importance and is likely to have a great effect on the proper administration of justice.”
Read the Fourth DCA's order:
The brief also cited the state Supreme Court's adjudication of a similar dispute involving DeSantis' ouster by executive order of another public official.
In that case, the high court granted expedited review and disposition to ex-Okaloosa County Schools Superintendent Mary Beth Jackson. Noting the similarity of Israel's and Jackson's allegations, the governor's attorneys asked justices to tackle both matters at the same time.
But Israel's counsel disagree that the former sheriff's case should bypass the district court of appeal. Miami attorney Benedict “Ben” Kuehne and Palm Beach Gardens litigator Stuart Kaplan instead filed a response contending their client's appeal ought to first go before the Fourth District Court of Appeal.
“Sheriff Israel suggests that Supreme Court review is premature at this time,” the filing said. “Instead, the legal issue involved can be better sharpened by this court's review in the first instance, especially since the appeal challenges the governor's limited constitutional authority to supplant the decision of Broward County voters, who overwhelmingly elected Sheriff Israel as their sheriff to serve until 2020. At issue in this appeal is the guarantee of the Florida Constitution that '[a]ll political power is inherent in the people.' ”
Kuehne and Kaplan also rebutted opposing counsel's attempt to consolidate Israel's case with Jackson's.
Jackson's suit “posits a significantly different jurisdictional question: Does the governor's suspension power allow the suspension of an elected official for conduct occurring before the elected official's current election?” their filing said. “In Sheriff Israel's situation, although the actions complained of by the governor occurred before the governor was elected, Sheriff Israel's actions in 2017 and 2018 are within the sheriff's current elected term of office.”
DeSantis' communications director Helen Aguirre Ferré did not respond to requests for comment by press time.
Kuehne told the Daily Business Review Tuesday that if the high court accepts jurisdiction, Israel would look “forward to a full evaluation of the governor's constitutional powers” and would expect the Florida Supreme Court to agree this was “a constitutional overreach” by DeSantis.
“As an appellate specialist I always welcome the opportunity to present challenging constitutional issues to the Florida Supreme Court,” Kuehne said. “We now have an important case that will be tested by a new version of the Florida Supreme Court, which makes the appeal even more exciting.”
Related stories:
Read the Ruling: Judge Dismisses Case by Broward Sheriff Ousted Over Parkland Shooting
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readUS Judge OKs Partial Release of Ex-Special Counsel's Final Report in Election Case
3 minute readSpecial Counsel Jack Smith Prepares Final Report as Trump Opposes Its Release
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Perkins Coie Lures Former Longtime Wilson Sonsini Tech Transactions Partner
- 2‘The Decision Will Help Others’: NJ Supreme Court Reverses Appellate Div. in OPRA Claim Over Body-Worn Camera Footage
- 3MoFo Associate Sees a Familiar Face During Her First Appellate Argument: Justice Breyer
- 4Antitrust in Trump 2.0: Expect Gap Filling from State Attorneys General
- 5People in the News—Jan. 22, 2025—Knox McLaughlin, Saxton & Stump
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250