Fired SeaWorld Associate General Counsel Charged With Insider Trading
After a period of financial decline, SeaWorld was set to beat analysts' financial expectations. The SEC alleged former associate general counsel Paul Powers used that confidential information to turn a profit.
April 09, 2019 at 06:02 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
A former SeaWorld lawyer has been charged in Orlando with insider trading by allegedly capitalizing on an internal projection of an upturn in company finances.
In a civil complaint filed Tuesday, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged former SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment Inc. associate general counsel Paul Powers used confidential information that the company was set to exceed analysts' financial performance expectations in the second quarter 2018.
Trading on that information generated about $65,000 in alleged “illicit profits.” The Justice Department announced parallel criminal charges against Powers on Tuesday.
The SEC charge Powers received a draft earnings release last Aug. 1 and purchased 18,000 shares of company stock the next day. When SeaWorld released its earnings in an 8-K filing Aug. 6, the company's stock rose 17 percent — and Powers sold all his shares on the upswing.
“Powers blatantly exploited his access to nonpublic information by misusing SeaWorld's confidential revenue data to enrich himself,” Kurt Gottschall, the director of the SEC's Denver regional office, said in a news release. “Investors should feel confident in the integrity of corporate officers, particularly attorneys. The SEC is committed to swiftly pursuing insiders who breach their duties to investors.”
The SEC and Powers declined to comment further on the charges. SeaWorld did not respond to a request for comment by deadline.
The Orlando-based marine animal amusement park fired Powers last October over the alleged insider trading, according to the SEC's complaint. Powers broke the law and SeaWorld policy by trading outside of a window period, not receiving approval from SeaWorld's general counsel before selling his shares and using confidential information to inform trades, , the SEC complaint said.
“At the time of his trading, defendant knew his trading was in breach of SeaWorld's trading policy, knew his trading was in breach of duty of trust and confidence that he owed to SeaWorld and its shareholders, and knowingly and willfully breached the trading policy and his duty by trading in securities issued by SeaWorld while in possession of material and confidential information,” the SEC said in its complaint.
Powers joined SeaWorld's legal department in October 2010. At the time of his termination, his LinkedIn profile stated he was corporate counsel, assistant secretary and a member of the company's business ethics committee, whose practice areas included “corporate finance, real estate, environmental, bankruptcy, and contracts.”
He previously held in-house roles at GenAudio Inc. and Anheuser-Busch Cos., where he overlapped with Tony Taylor, who went on to become SeaWorld's general counsel, chief legal officer and corporate secretary.
Powers' LinkedIn profile, which has not been updated since he left SeaWorld, said he was an associate at Armstrong Teasdale from 1987 to 1992 and Thompson Coburn from 1985 to 1987. He is not listed as an attorney in Florida Bar records.
From 2013 to 2017, SeaWorld was in financial decline with lower attendance and a 60 percent drop in share value from $33 to $13 per share. Powers sold his shares for $25.40.
Released in 2013, the film “Blackfish” focused on SeaWorld's captive orcas following an Orlando trainer's death after a show in 2010. The company pledged to stop its killer whale shows and captive breeding program in 2017.
SeaWorld and its former CEO reached a $5 million settlement with the SEC last September on charges the company understated the impact of the Oscar-winning documentary on its finances and reputation.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Families Settle Court Battle Over Who Owns Parkland Killer's Name, Likeness
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 2Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 3Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 4Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 5X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250