Florida Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Scott Israel's Lawsuit Against Gov. DeSantis
Israel's brief is due by April 13, while DeSantis must file his by April 16. The governor said he booted Israel in part for incompetency regarding the Broward Sheriff's Office's handling of the mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland on Feb. 14, 2018.
April 11, 2019 at 03:51 PM
3 minute read
The Florida Supreme Court has accepted jurisdiction in ex-Broward Sheriff Scott Israel's lawsuit against Gov. Ron DeSantis, who removed him from office via an executive order.
The high court's decision to hear the case arrived less than a week after Israel challenged in the Fourth District Court of Appeal the dismissal of his suit by Broward Circuit Judge David Haimes.
DeSantis responded to that appeal by filing an April 5 motion, contending the dispute should bypass the state appellate court and that Florida Supreme Court ought to rule on Israel's allegations of gubernatorial abuse.
“There is a need for immediate resolution of this dispute by the Florida Supreme Court,” the filing said. “The issue is of great public importance and is likely to have a great effect on the proper administration of justice.”
The Fourth DCA entered an order Tuesday certifying the litigation to the Florida Supreme Court.
Then on Wednesday, the high court accepted the case. Israel's brief is due by April 13, while DeSantis must file by April 16. Israel's response brief is scheduled to be filed one day later, on April 17.
The governor's press office did not respond to requests for comment by press time.
Read the Florida Supreme Court's order:
Appellate attorney Benedict “Ben” Kuehne, who is representing Israel alongside Palm Beach Gardens lawyer Stuart Kaplan, said his client “welcomes the expedited briefing schedule.” Their client claims DeSantis' actions in suspending and then firing him through an executive order exceeded the governor's powers under the Florida Constitution.
For his part, DeSantis said he booted Israel in part for incompetency regarding the Broward Sheriff's Office's handling of the mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland on Feb. 14, 2018.
But plaintiff counsel Kuehne and Kaplan say the move “represents an unprecedented use of the suspension power to disenfranchise the voters, who alone hold the authority to determine their elected officials.”
“This is not merely an issue for Sheriff Israel, whose removal resulted from the governor's election campaign political deal-making,” the attorneys said in a statement. “It also represents an unprecedented use of the suspension power to disenfranchise the voters, who alone hold the authority to determine their elected officials.”
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250