Lawmakers Weigh Requiring 500,000 Medicaid Beneficiaries to Work
Members of a House health care panel this week approved HB 955, which is now ready to go to the full House.
April 11, 2019 at 12:39 PM
5 minute read
Florida lawmakers are considering requiring an estimated 500,000 Medicaid beneficiaries to work or show they are trying to get jobs to keep their health care benefits, despite recent court rulings that have struck down similar requirements.
Members of a House health care panel this week approved the proposal (HB 955), which is now ready to go to the full House.
While the Senate hasn't considered the proposal this legislative session, the notion of a work requirement is supported by Sen. Aaron Bean, a Fernandina Beach Republican in charge of crafting the Senate's health care spending plan.
“I would be interested in that,” Bean said when asked about the issue.
The House is moving forward with the legislation after a pair of rulings by U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg that tossed similar work requirements in Kentucky and Arkansas. Boasberg serves in the District of Columbia.
Mandating work requirements has been a long-standing priority for conservatives. In a party-line vote, members of the House Health and Human Services Committee on Tuesday approved the Florida bill, sponsored by Rep. Daniel Perez, R-Miami.
The proposed work requirement would hit low-income adults who have children.
“The true intent of this bill really is good at heart. It's just to make sure that the individuals who are able to work, that are able to get back to our society, are doing so if they are receiving government benefits,” Perez said.
But Joan Alker, executive director of the Center for Children and Families at Georgetown University, disagreed.
“If this bill becomes law, it would be the harshest (and that is saying something!) that I have seen so far — with no parent excluded unless they have a newborn under 3 months old,” Alker wrote in her blog, describing the bill.
Florida has the fourth-largest Medicaid program in the nation in terms of the number of beneficiaries and the fifth-largest program in terms of expenditures, according to state Medicaid officials. The program covers nearly 4 million people — mostly through Medicaid managed care plans — and costs more than $28 billion.
Not all low-income people in Florida qualify for the Medicaid program. The state determines eligibility, and lawmakers have set different eligibility requirements for different groups.
For instance, pregnant women can earn almost twice as much as the poverty level, which is $12,140 for an individual, and be enrolled in the Medicaid program. Florida has not expanded Medicaid to able-bodied childless adults.
The House bill would direct the Agency for Health Care Administration to request federal approval to require beneficiaries to engage in work activities to remain eligible for Medicaid coverage. The bill would exempt people who receive Medicaid long-term care coverage, such as seniors in nursing homes.
The proposed work activities mirror those already included in a state temporary cash assistance program. Florida requires the maximum number of work hours allowed under federal law, which means, for example, that single parents with children over age 6 are required to work 30 hours per week.
The proposed Medicaid work requirements would not apply to the large number of children who receive health care through the program and are not expected to apply to people who qualify for Social Security Disability Income.
Katie Betta, a spokeswoman for Senate President Bill Galvano, R-Bradenton, said in an email Wednesday that Galvano is “open to work requirements for able-bodied adults.” But she said his support in the past for such ideas also involved wanting options to meet the requirements, including on-the-job training, job-placement activities and pursuit of educational opportunities. She also said he has wanted exceptions for people with disabilities and caregivers of people with disabilities.
Karen Woodall, a longtime social-services lobbyist, told House committee members that Medicaid and the temporary cash assistance programs aren't the same. One program provides money, she said, while the other provides health benefits.
Requiring Medicaid beneficiaries to work would likely result in people losing coverage, said Woodall, executive director of the left-leaning Florida Center for Fiscal and Economic Policy.
Also, the jobs Medicaid enrollees are able to secure may not come with benefits such as health insurance, she said, adding that would leave them with little money and no health care coverage.
“I would encourage you to look at a different approach in assisting the folks and see what kind of help can be there without tying loss of their health insurance to it, because you are just going to exacerbate the loss of their health insurance to it,” Woodall said.
Christine Sexton reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFla.'s Statute of Limitations and Statutes of Repose in Med Mal Cases: It's Not Over Until It's Over
6 minute readGC of Florida State Agency Steps Down After Threatening TV Stations That Aired Abortion-Rights Ad
Trending Stories
- 1'It Refreshes Me': King & Spalding Privacy Leader Doubles as Equestrian Champ
- 2Class Action Filed Against Houston Health Savings Account Firm for Allegedly Confiscating Client Funds
- 3These 2 Lawyers Just Became Florida Judges
- 4'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
- 5Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250