Public Reprimand for Broward Judge Accused of Mistreating Attorneys, High Court Rules
The Judicial Qualifications Commission accused Broward Judge Dennis Bailey of losing his temper with Fort Lauderdale public defenders Gustavo Javier Martinez and James Allen Foretich in a felony criminal trial.
April 11, 2019 at 01:12 PM
4 minute read
Broward Circuit Judge Dennis Bailey will receive a public reprimand after violating five canons of the Code of Judicial Conduct by mistreating two attorneys in a felony criminal trial, the Florida Supreme Court ruled in a per curiam opinion Thursday.
The reprimand is scheduled for June 5 at 9 a.m.
The Judicial Qualifications Commission brought ethics charges against Bailey in December 2018, accusing him of being intemperate with Fort Lauderdale public defenders Gustavo Javier Martinez and James Allen Foretich when presiding over State v. Genesis Espejo.
The JQC's investigative panel found Bailey got frustrated with the lawyers as they tried to argue the same objection in a sidebar conference.
“When one of the attorneys tried to help his colleague articulate a point during the sidebar, Judge Bailey repeatedly attempted to quiet him by saying, 'One lawyer at a time,' 'Only one lawyer argues,' followed shortly thereafter by, 'You have a hard time understanding me? Two lawyers can't argue one argument,' ” JQC Chair Krista Marx wrote in her findings.
Bailey later described the conversation as “white noise” to investigators, who found the judge inappropriately had one lawyer physically removed before the jury. According to the high court justices, there was no standing order that only one attorney per side could argue a point.
Bailey allegedly then gave the defendant 45 minutes to file a motion to disqualify him — a motion he branded legally insufficient and denied, along with a motion for mistrial.
The JQC suggested the subsequent not-guilty verdict could have stemmed from sympathy for the defense lawyers. But Bailey argued the opposite at a JQC hearing, claiming it proved the incident hadn't affected the jury.
Defense lawyers Martinez and Foretich had tried to remove Bailey earlier in the case for allegedly being condescending and sarcastic, and for reprimanding one of them for whispering in co-counsel's ear at a hearing.
Bailey's lawyer Michael E. Dutko of Dutko & Kroll in Fort Lauderdale said his client is pleased with the decision and looks forward to moving on.
“Prior to going on the bench Judge Bailey was a very experienced litigator. While on the bench he's presided over many jury trials very efficiently and has gained favorable comments and praise from defense attorneys and prosecutors alike,” Dutko said. “In this situation, he simply was a bit less patient than he should have been with a young, inexperienced assistant public defender.”
JQC attorney Alex Williams did not immediately respond.
Click here to read the JQC's findings
Bailey agreed to a public reprimand in a December 2018 stipulation, which said he's undergoing stress management courses, “so that in the future he is better equipped to handle stressful situations, and does not resort to knee-jerk reactions.”
The high court found Bailey violated canons governing patient, dignified and courteous behavior, as well as integrity, independence and the promotion of public confidence in the judiciary.
The court aligned itself with certain findings by the JQC, one of which said, “There are tools that judges have for dealing with inappropriate conduct by lawyers: admonishment, referrals to the Florida Bar, or in extreme cases — contempt proceedings. All of these were available to Judge Bailey if he truly felt that the attorneys were disruptive during the Espejo trial. Yet he chose not to utilize any of them.”
But the justices steered away from a “more severe” sanction because Bailey admitted his actions were inappropriate and intemperate, apologized and complied with the JQC's investigation.
“We see no reason to do anything different here,” the opinion said.
Bailey was elected to the bench in 2014 and has no disciplinary history as a judge or during his 28 years as a trial lawyer — 10 of which he spent serving as an assistant state attorney.
Read the full court opinion:
Related stories:
Broward Judge in Hot Seat Over Alleged Mistreatment of Attorneys
Miami Judge to be Publicly Reprimanded
JQC Drops Case Against Former Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Stephen Millan
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Voyeur Videotaped Them Undressing. Should Cruise Ship Passengers Have to Arbitrate?
3 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readSupreme Court Wrestles With Disabled Ex-Firefighter's Discrimination Case
Juror No. 3 Challenges Florida Defense Counsel During Closing Argument
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Snapshot Judgement: The Case Against Illustrated Indictments
- 2Texas Supreme Court Grapples Over Fifth Circuit Question on State Usury Law
- 3Exploring the Opportunities and Risks for Generative AI and Corporate Databases: An Introduction
- 4Farella Elevates First Female Firmwide Managing Partners
- 5Family Court 2024 Roundup: Part I
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250