10 Years For Attacking Family During Wild Drug Bender is Generous, Court Rules
Nico Gallo claimed voices in his head told him to attack a Martin County family while he was high on drugs that a judge said made him "psychotically violent with super-human strength." Gallo appealed his 10-year sentence, but the Fourth District Court of Appeal wouldn't bite.
April 12, 2019 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
The Fourth District Court of Appeal declined to rehear a “disturbing” case, ruling prosecutors had been generous enough with Martin County man Nico Gallo, whose hallucinogenic drug binge saw him “cannonball” through a stranger's living room window, attack a mother and son, and try to drink his own blood.
Gallo — a 19-year-old with no criminal history when he broke in — pleaded guilty to trespassing, battery on a police officer, resisting arrest with violence and criminal mischief. He'd asked the court to reconsider his 10-year sentence, which he deemed constitutionally inappropriate.
Gallo's victims had to fight for their lives when he stirred them from bed by breaking in, saying, “I'm sorry, I'm sorry … I'm going to die today,” according to the opinion. The son wrestled with Gallo, hitting him with a baseball bat.
Police said Gallo appeared to be talking to Satan when they arrived, and trying to drink from a pool of his own blood, according to the court opinion, which said it took a Hazmat team to clean up.
Gallo's lawyers, West Palm Beach Public Defender Carey Haughwout and Assistant Public Defender Claire V. Madill said they were disappointed with the decision, which they said overlooked “the unfairness and injustice of sentencing a first-time 19-year-old offender to 10 years in prison.”
“The sentencing guidelines recommend that he get a sentence of probation or jail and all the evidence at sentencing indicated that Nico is a good kid who made a one-time mistake,” Madill said. “A 10-year prison sentence is not generous or compassionate. Rather, it is the type of sentence that ruins lives.”
At his sentencing, Gallo reportedly told the court, “I'm sorry. I know words are never going to be enough to fix what's happened.” He's since argued Martin Circuit Judge Lawrence Mirman was too harsh, as he hoped Gallo's sentence would discourage teens from taking drugs — in Gallo's case, cannabis, acid and methlyone.
The opinion cited Mirman's findings that, ”The need for deterrence overwhelms any remorse or apology” — something he said “does not ring loudly” considering the drugs made him “violently psychotic with super-human strength.”
Fourth DCA Judge Robert M. Gross ruled Gallo's sentence was well below any constitutional limits and, backed by Judges Burton Conner and Alan Forst, declined to make the case a matter of public importance.
The court found Gallo's sentence could have been longer, if it weren't for a plea bargain reducing a burglary charge to a trespass.
“Only because of the work of appellant's trial counsel and the generosity of the prosecutor in reducing the first-degree felony charge was appellant offered the chance to plead guilty to misdemeanor and three-third degree felonies, instead of a felony carrying a maximum penalty of life imprisonment,” Gross wrote.
Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody represented the state with Melynda Melear, and did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Read the full court opinion:
|More criminal law stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRogge Dunn Represents Florida Trucking Firm in Civil RICO Suit Against Worldwide Express
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Connecticut Movers: Year-End Promotions, Hires and an Office Opening
- 2Luigi Mangione Defense Attorney Says NYC Mayor’s Comments on Case Raise Fair Trial Concerns
- 3Revisiting the Boundaries Between Proper and Improper Argument: 10 Years Later
- 4Hochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
- 5Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Customers: Developments on ‘Conquesting’ from the Ninth Circuit
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250