Baseballer Miguel Cabrera Catches Third-Party Lawsuit From Ex-Business Partners
Both sides are throwing blame in a messy business breakup between Major League Baseball player Miguel Cabrera, majority owner of Miggy Foods, and former minority shareholders Daniel Satine and Yajaira Gonzalez.
April 15, 2019 at 06:42 PM
4 minute read
Ex-business partners of Major League Baseball player Miguel Cabrera have taken a swing at the Detroit Tigers star, claiming he and his business associates pushed them out of Florida snack manufacturing company Total Food Distributors Inc., known as Miggy Foods.
In a third-party complaint filed Thursday, husband-and-wife former minority shareholders of Miggy Foods, Daniel Satine and Yajaira Gonzalez, claim they were strong-armed into making Cabrera majority owner, then wrongfully fired from the company that makes children's snacks called BitBits.
Cabrera, nicknamed “Miggy,” is the first baseman for the Detroit Tigers. Cabrera is an 11-time MLB All-Star, batting champion and two-time Most Valuable Player.
The claims against him stem from a derailed business partnership. In the underlying lawsuit, Cabrera's company filed suit against several fired minority shareholders in the snack business, accusing them of financial mismanagement. But now, Satine and Gonzalez have fired back with counterclaims of their own.
Miggy Foods had swung first, suing Satine and Gonzalez in July 2018 over claims they made self-serving decisions and treated the company as ”their own personal piggy bank.” According to the complaint, the defendants created “opulent” offices decorated with high-quality furniture and equipment, and had Miggy Foods lease a building at $5,100 per month for no good reason.
Counsel to Miggy Foods, Christopher J. Perez-Gurri and Alan G. Geffin, were not available for comment before deadline. But their filings accused Satine and Gonzalez of being liberal with company credit cards, committing to expensive sponsorship deals with the Miami Dolphins and Detroit Tigers, and paying themselves “excessive” $319,000 salaries.
Miggy Foods claimed it lost about $2.1 million. Its suit alleges breach of fiduciary duty, civil conspiracy, conversion and deceptive and unfair trade practices, allegations Satine and Gonzalez deny.
|
Click here to read Miggy Foods' complaint
Satine and Gonzalez were tasked with marketing and growing the business, according to their lawyers, Marta Colomar-Garcia, Roland Potts and Karel Suarez of Diaz, Reuz & Targ in Miami, who said majority owner Cabrera and his wife held the purse strings. The way Colomar-Garcia tells it, the Cabreras starved the company of money, left invoices unpaid and skipped important events.
“[The lawsuit] was basically an excuse from Total Foods Distributors to continue using their strong-arm tactics that they have always been using against our client, just because they don't want them in the company anymore,” Colomar-Garcia said.
The defendants have responded with 20 allegations against Miggy Foods, Cabrera, his wife, brother-in-law and business associates. Among them: deceptive and unfair trade practices, fraudulent inducement, breach of oral contract, unjust enrichment and tortious interference.
Satine and Gonzalez moved to the U.S. from Venezuela, where they had their own candy and cereal company. Their answer to the complaint alleges Cabrera fell “in love with” their business and induced them create a U.S. version with him as the face of the product, originally agreeing to 10% ownership.
The third-party complaint alleges that Cabrera's stake kept rising until he and his wife, through their company 2C&P LLC, owned 60% and fired Satine and Gonzalez via email. The termination letters attached to the third-party complaint don't specify why Miggy Foods let them go, though the company filed suit soon after.
Co-counsel Potts alleges that this was a scheme by Cabrera to use Satine and Gonzalez, and benefit from their know-how and industry connections.
“Our clients initially had a successful confectionery business and they took that model, even going to the extent of using the same formula and recipe for some of their products, and they basically transplanted that idea into the United States, with what was supposed to be the financial backing and support of Miguel Cabrera,” Potts said.
The third-party plaintiffs also included text messages from Cabrera to Satine, alleging company communications broke down as the star became depressed when his marriage fell apart, thanks to child support claims from an alleged mistress.
Miggy Foods seeks damages, lost profits, interest, attorney fees and costs, as does its former minority shareholders. Discovery is underway.
Read the defendants' answer and third-party complaint:
|Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Practice Leaders 'Bullish' That Second Trump Presidency Will Be Good for Business
3 minute readBig Law Leaders, Dealmakers Optimistic About M&A Deal Flow Under Trump, With Caveats
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 5Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250