Carlton Fields Survey: Data Breaches Will Be the Next Class Action Trend
More than half of in-house counsel expect the next wave of class action lawsuits to be a product of massive data breaches.
April 16, 2019 at 05:44 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
The next wave of class action lawsuits will be the result of massive data breaches, according to the eighth annual Carlton Fields Class Action Survey.
The survey released Tuesday is based on interviews with general counsel or senior legal officers at 395 Fortune 1000 companies in the U.S.
In 2017, 29 percent of corporate counsel expected to see more class actions coming from data privacy and security. That number nearly doubled in 2018 to 54 percent.
The report also said in-house lawyers are more concerned with the California Consumer Privacy Act, or CCPA, which takes effect in 2020, than the E.U.'s General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR.
But Kavon Adli, the founder of The Internet Law Group in Beverly Hills, California, said companies should be as, if not more, concerned with the GDPR.
“I think the risk of a class action is more limited in the case of the CCPA,” Adli said.
He explained data security is a limited area of the CCPA that provides for a right of action, but the GDPR provides for a private right of action for all of its provisions.
“The CCPA is still sort of in flux. There have been some legislative processes, and there may still be more before it goes into effect,” Adli said. “At the current time it is far more limited than the GDPR.”
Julianna McCabe, director of the survey and a Miami shareholder at Carlton Fields, said state laws like the CCPA and Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act make it easier to file class action suits.
“When the legislators in those states pass laws that allow consumers to bring private rights of action regarding these data issues companies are rightly concerned,” McCabe said. “California in particular is a place where class actions are filed more than in any other state in the nation. California is an issue; Illinois is an issue, and other states are starting to copy those laws that are probably going to get passed in the next three to five years.”
Edward McAndrew, a partner at DLA Piper in Washington, said a CCPA provision entitles California residents to some level of damages. He also said residents do not need to prove a direct injury because of the data breach, just that the company violated the CCPA.
“Early on, we saw a lot of cases being dismissed on standing grounds. With these statutory causes of action, it's going to be much more difficult to get cases dismissed at a preliminary stage,” McAndrew said. “Those cases haven't been going into a full-scale discovery period.”
Because of this, he expects companies to be subject to extensive and expensive discovery demands.
“Those are going to six and seven figure expenses for these companies,” McAndrew explained.
The report said companies spent $2.46 billion defending class actions in 2018, the highest dollar figure since 2008. Most companies said they are facing class actions only in the United States.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Trending Stories
- 1Commission Confirms Three of Newsom's Appellate Court Picks
- 2Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 3GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 4'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 5Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250