Carlton Fields Survey: Data Breaches Will Be the Next Class Action Trend
More than half of in-house counsel expect the next wave of class action lawsuits to be a product of massive data breaches.
April 16, 2019 at 05:44 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
The next wave of class action lawsuits will be the result of massive data breaches, according to the eighth annual Carlton Fields Class Action Survey.
The survey released Tuesday is based on interviews with general counsel or senior legal officers at 395 Fortune 1000 companies in the U.S.
In 2017, 29 percent of corporate counsel expected to see more class actions coming from data privacy and security. That number nearly doubled in 2018 to 54 percent.
The report also said in-house lawyers are more concerned with the California Consumer Privacy Act, or CCPA, which takes effect in 2020, than the E.U.'s General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR.
But Kavon Adli, the founder of The Internet Law Group in Beverly Hills, California, said companies should be as, if not more, concerned with the GDPR.
“I think the risk of a class action is more limited in the case of the CCPA,” Adli said.
He explained data security is a limited area of the CCPA that provides for a right of action, but the GDPR provides for a private right of action for all of its provisions.
“The CCPA is still sort of in flux. There have been some legislative processes, and there may still be more before it goes into effect,” Adli said. “At the current time it is far more limited than the GDPR.”
Julianna McCabe, director of the survey and a Miami shareholder at Carlton Fields, said state laws like the CCPA and Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act make it easier to file class action suits.
“When the legislators in those states pass laws that allow consumers to bring private rights of action regarding these data issues companies are rightly concerned,” McCabe said. “California in particular is a place where class actions are filed more than in any other state in the nation. California is an issue; Illinois is an issue, and other states are starting to copy those laws that are probably going to get passed in the next three to five years.”
Edward McAndrew, a partner at DLA Piper in Washington, said a CCPA provision entitles California residents to some level of damages. He also said residents do not need to prove a direct injury because of the data breach, just that the company violated the CCPA.
“Early on, we saw a lot of cases being dismissed on standing grounds. With these statutory causes of action, it's going to be much more difficult to get cases dismissed at a preliminary stage,” McAndrew said. “Those cases haven't been going into a full-scale discovery period.”
Because of this, he expects companies to be subject to extensive and expensive discovery demands.
“Those are going to six and seven figure expenses for these companies,” McAndrew explained.
The report said companies spent $2.46 billion defending class actions in 2018, the highest dollar figure since 2008. Most companies said they are facing class actions only in the United States.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250