US Will Allow Americans to Sue Over Property Confiscated by Cuban Government
National Security Adviser John Bolton is expected to announce on Wednesday the implementation of Title III of the Helms-Burton Act, allowing Americans to bring lawsuits against individuals or companies that "traffic" in property confiscated by Cuba after the 1959 Cuban revolution.
April 16, 2019 at 05:58 PM
3 minute read
|
The Trump administration will for the first time allow lawsuits to be filed in U.S. courts against companies doing business in Cuba that use properties that were confiscated from Cuban-Americans and other U.S. citizens after the Cuban revolution.
According to Reuters, National Security Adviser John Bolton will on Wednesday announce implementation of Title III of the Helms-Burton Act. That law was signed by President Bill Clinton in 1996 but has been waived by every U.S. president for the past 23 years. Implementing the law could expose U.S., European and Canadian companies to legal action worth billions of dollars.
The law allows Americans, including Cubans who have since become U.S. citizens, to bring lawsuits against individuals or companies that “traffic” in property confiscated by Cuba after the 1959 Cuban revolution.
Full implementation of the law comes as the international community has begun warming up to Cuba, pouring billions in foreign direct investment into the country. Spain, for example, is Cuba's third largest trading partner. Spanish hotelier Melia alone has 34 properties in Cuba, according to its website. Companies in Canada, Germany, France and the U.S. have also entered into joint ventures with the Cuban government in light of the Obama administration policies easing restrictions on investment, putting them at risk.
But an onslaught of lawsuits is not a foregone conclusion even with full implementation, according to Akerman attorney Pedro Freyre, who is representing potential defendants.
“Helms-Burton is a particularly technical and complicated piece of legislation,” Freyre said. “This is not a quick claim, it requires a lot of preparation and upfront research to go forward.”
Nick Gutierrez, a former attorney and a Cuban-American, has worked with hundreds of Cuban exile families since taking part in the bill's original passage, organizing legal documents proving ownership of confiscated land with the hope that one day a U.S. president would allow the Title III provision to take effect.
He acknowledges that there will be “a long road ahead.”
Mexico, Canada and Spain passed so-called blocking statutes shortly after Helms-Burton's passage, barring claims from being brought in their respective countries. And even when a company is exposed to U.S. jurisdiction, there is a high standard to bring a suit.
The property must be actively in use for some sort of commercial activity and be worth over $50,000. Plus, plaintiffs must pay a $6,700 filing fee, a provision written into the law to discourage frivolous litigation, Gutierrez said.
Nevertheless, Gutierrez welcomed news that implementation may be imminent.
“This is sort of the long-awaited answer to our prayers. This is the beginning as a powerful disincentive to investing in Cuba,” he said. ”These Spanish companies will hire big-name firms. But we hope this will spur settlements between traffickers and owners.”
The Trump administration in early March announced a partial implementation of the Helms-Burton Act, allowing lawsuits against 200 Cuban entities, including hotels, beverage manufacturers and tourism agencies, that were blacklisted by the U.S. because they have ties to Cuba's military and intelligence services.
The move, hailed by the Cuban American Bar Association and Florida's U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio, was largely symbolic, as prosecuting Cuban-owned establishments is nearly impossible.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMiami’s Arbitration Week Aims To Cement City’s Status as Dispute Destination
3 minute readBrazil Is Quickly Becoming a Vital LatAm Market for Greenberg Traurig, Other US Law Firms
5 minute read'Would've Been Snoring Without Ya': Fort Lauderdale Jury Awards $4.5 Million in Condo Investment Spat
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250