Bayside Marketplace Restaurants File Suit Against Landlord Over Renovations
The lawsuit against the shopping center followed attempts by the property owners to evict longtime tenants.
April 17, 2019 at 03:46 PM
4 minute read
A Miami-Dade judge has rejected landlord Bayside Marketplace LLC's motion to dismiss a lawsuit brought against the shopping center by former tenants.
On March 27, Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Alexander Bokor denied Bayside's motion to dismiss the suit by tenants Kelly's Cajun Grill, Yeung's Lotus Express and Cajun and Grill of America Inc. against their onetime landlord. The restaurants, which filed jointly as IRMG of Bayside Inc., filed the counterclaim in Bayside's 2017 suit to evict the tenants. In addition to IRMG of Bayside, food vendors Tango Grill and Gusto Pizzeria have also responded to the waterfront mall's eviction actions with lawsuits of their own.
Filings by the counter-plaintiffs contend Bayside's owners had persuaded its tenants to break pre-existing lease agreements in 2013 to renovate the more than 3-decade-old commercial property. But according to the lawsuits, Bayside never made the improvements, causing economic losses for the eateries due to lack of customers.
In response to Bayside's motion to dismiss, IRMG of Bayside argued the mall's representatives “promised that the food court would be renovated and upgraded as part of a $6 million expenditure.”
“Landlord induced tenant and its affiliates to terminate their current lucrative leases, move to new locations within the food court, perform expensive upgraded renovations themselves that would correspond with landlord's promised upgrades to the food court, and enter into new, more expensive leases that Landlord claimed it needed in order to recoup some of its $6 million expenditure,” the response said.
Read the counter-complaint against Bayside Marketplace:
But the counter-plaintiffs' response stated Bayside's management did not hold up its end of the bargain and “refused to perform the promised renovations.”
“Landlord allowed Bayside and the food court to deteriorate, including, among other things, non- or poorly functioning air conditioning, bathrooms and escalators; allowing unsanitary conditions, such as birds and vermin; allowing homeless persons to loiter, panhandle, and harass customers; and blocking visibility to tenant's restaurants, effectively destroying tenant's 30-year-old business,” the filing said.
The counter-complaints accuse Bayside and its management partners — General Growth Properties and Ashkenazy Acquisition Corp. — of breach of lease, unjust enrichment, fraudulent inducement and negligent misrepresentation.
A representative in Ashkenazy Acquisition Corp.'s legal department declined to comment on the litigation. Bayside's legal counsel, Pathman Lewis attorneys John Moore and Peter Meltzer, did not respond to requests for comment by deadline. The defendants' motion to dismiss argued in part that IRMG's charge of unjust enrichment should be dismissed with prejudice for failing to state a cause of action. The filing also cited the vendors' delay in vacating the premises, despite the poor conditions alleged.
“IRMG was still on the premises and operating its business for 3 1/2 months after it alleged to the court that the conditions at the premises were so terrible that it had been constructively evicted,” the motion said.
Damian & Valori partner Melanie Damian is representing IRMG, Tango Grill and Gusto Pizzeria in their respective counterclaims against Bayside Market.
Damian said, “IRMG of Bayside, doing business as Kelly's Cajun Grill, Yeung's Lotus Express and Cajun Grill is looking forward to presenting its very strong case for damages based on the landlord's broken promises to improve the food court and wrongful conduct allowing the Bayside Food Court to drastically deteriorate.”
Related stories:
Miami Lawyer Appointed Receiver in $30 Million Brickell Fraud Case
Millionaire Beats French Lender for Control of Fisher Island Condo
Bayside's parent rejects investor's call to put company up for sale
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDid 17 Drinks Lead to Woman's Death? Lawsuit Blames Casino
Not a Happy Birthday: Woman Sues Kyle G's Prime Seafood & Steaks After Severe Food Allergic Reaction
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Sides with Retail Display Company in Patent Dispute Against Campbell Soup, Grocery Stores
- 2Is It Time for Large UK Law Firms to Begin Taking Private Equity Investment?
- 3Federal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Launch Defensive Measure
- 4Class Action Litigator Tapped to Lead Shook, Hardy & Bacon's Houston Office
- 5Arizona Supreme Court Presses Pause on KPMG's Bid to Deliver Legal Services
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250