Investors Claiming EB-5 Visa Fraud Fight With Centennial Bank to Get Money Back
Investors who say they were duped into sinking $10 million into an office project now are fighting Centennial Bank to get some money back. The bank claims it should collect first on an $8.5 million mortgage.
April 17, 2019 at 04:53 PM
6 minute read
Foreigners who say they were tricked into investing $10 million in a Royal Palm Beach office project have redirected their fight from the alleged swindlers to a bank.
The investors and Centennial Bank are facing off in state court with each one arguing it should be first in line to get paid out from the partially finished venture.
Centennial Bank's claim stems from an $8.5 million mortgage it issued on the property. The investors say they were promised their loans would be secured by a first-priority mortgage, but they say they were duped and that mortgage never was recorded.
The issue started as another EB-5 investment visa fraud case tied to South Florida real estate, at least the third one since last summer. The federal visa program gives green cards to foreigners who invest at least $500,000 in a U.S. commercial venture that creates at least 10 jobs.
In this case, 19 foreigners from China, Vietnam and Russia said they invested in the 60-unit Royal Palm Business Plaza at 9200 Belvedere Road based on false promises about how the venture would work.
Investor attorney Kenneth Murena said some of the money was diverted from the project, and federal authorities have denied the visa requests because the offices weren't built-out.
The investors filed a federal lawsuit last September and amended it Feb. 5 to accuse Joseph Walsh Sr. of being the ringleader who defrauded them by routing their money through a series of limited liability companies.
Walsh, who didn't return a request for comment by deadline, founded a regional conduit that connected foreigners with EB-5 investment opportunities in the U.S. The South Atlantic Regional Center LLC is authorized by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service, which administers the EB-5 program.
Attorney Galen Criscione, a founding partner at Criscione Ravala in Fort Lauderdale, temporarily represented Walsh and other defendants but withdrew in January, citing irreconcilable differences among the defendants. The filing said Walsh lives in China, and the two communicated only by email.
The unresponsiveness of Walsh and other defendants has worked in the investors' advantage.
A clerk's default was entered April 3 on a request from Murena.
“We will not be fighting with Walsh and the entities any more unless they respond to our motion for default final judgment,” said Murena, a partner at Damian & Valori in Miami. He noted undoing a clerk's default is difficult.
Murena said he will seek $30 million in damages with the civil theft and civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act violation counts allowing treble damages.
“The fight in this case regarding our claims alleged in the first amended complaint, that fight is over,” Murena said. “We will be focusing on the fight with Centennial Bank in the foreclosure action.”
|Centennial Bank
Arkansas-based Centennial, which wasn't a defendant in the federal suit, got involved when the office's owner, Royal Palm Development I LLC, took out the mortgage.
The bank last October filed a state foreclosure suit against Royal Palm Development, Walsh and others, claiming a $7.7 million default on the loan and arguing it should be first in line for payment.
The investors, however, argue there's more to the story. Walsh took out the mortgage pledging the offices as collateral and promising the investors a first-priority mortgage to secure their loans.
The investors have sought to intervene as plaintiffs in the state case.
“We believe that the bank knew or should have known that this was an EB-5 project and that the property was purchased with investor funds, and that the investors …. were promised a first-position lien in the property that well predates the loan made by Centennial Bank,” Murena said.
The bank's attorney, Andrew Pineiro of Pineiro Byrd in Jupiter, declined comment.
Separately, a property receiver has come into play. In the federal investors' suit, U.S. District Judge Donald Middlebrooks on March 13 agreed with the investors' request to appoint a receiver.
Attorney Daniel Newman, a partner at Nelson Mullins Broad and Cassel in Miami, was named the receiver for Royal Palm Development I and Royal Palm Town Center IV LLLP, the company in which each investor became a limited partner.
Newman must respond to Centennial's complaint. He told the Daily Business Review he is assessing how to proceed.
Palm Beach Circuit Judge Janis Keyser, who presides over the foreclosure case, issued an order April 11 approving Newman's motion to vacate a clerk's default in that case.
|Project Status
Investors claim they were induced to put in money with a report that Connect Insurance Group Inc. had been secured as a 10-year tenant, according to the their complaint. The understanding was Connect would finish building out the offices in exchange for six rent-free months followed by rent of $1 million a year.
Instead, the lawsuit said at some point money started flowing in a reverse direction — $9 million, at least some of it investors' money, went to Connect .
The company is led by Deborah Johnson, Walsh's ex-wife, according to a status report Newman filed Friday in federal court. He reported 22 units in the complex are occupied and generating rent, and Centennial has collected $133,763 in rent.
Murena said Connect built out some of the units, which have been rented.
About 50 foreigners invested in the project. Of Murena's 19 clients, all but two still want green cards, while the other two are more interested in getting their money back.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250