Directors of Google Parent Accused of Fostering Workplace Harassment
The shareholder complaint claims company directors acted disloyally by approving "millions of dollars in unwarranted severance payments" following sexual misconduct claims against executives and managers.
April 18, 2019 at 05:11 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Business Court Insider
Investors in Alphabet Inc., the parent company of Google, accused the web giant's board of fostering a culture of “rampant sexual harassment” and covering up misconduct by senior male executives.
In a newly unsealed Delaware Chancery Court shareholder derivative complaint, four New York-based pension funds say corporate directors failed to maintain internal controls at Alphabet, leading the company to abandon its own policies governing sexual harassment and misconduct and causing it to pay “tens of millions of dollars” to corporate executives who were credibly accused.
The lawsuit cited massive public scrutiny of Alphabet in the wake of reports in The New York Times saying Andrew E. Rubin, Google's vice president for mobile and digital content, resigned with a $90 million severance package and a delayed repayment of a $14 million loan.
He left after allegations surfaced that he coerced a female Google employee into performing oral sex on him. According to the Times article, Rubin and another senior Google executive, Amit Singhal, walked away with hefty severance packages after they were accused of inappropriate sexual behavior.
Following that report, the lawsuit said Alphabet disclosed another 48 instances of sexual harassment reported in the previous two years, including 13 complaints against senior managers or executives.
According to the complaint, the U.S. Department of Labor has been investigating Alphabet for allegedly failing to cooperate with an audit that revealed pay disparities for female employees. Last November, more than 20,000 Alphabet workers participated in a walkout to protest the company's handling of workplace misconduct allegations.
“Since the walkout, public scrutiny has intensified and the company has initiated small changes to address these pervasive failures going forward,” the complaint said. “However, these belated, reactionary steps are insufficient to remedy the pervasive harm that has already been done to the company or to address the systemic, cultural problems that defendants have permitted at Alphabet for far too long.”
Alphabet's media office did not respond to a request for comment by deadline.
The filing targeted Alphabet directors Lawrence R. Page, Sergey Brin and Eric E. Schmidt, who own a combined 56 percent of Alphabet's total voting power and exercise control of the board.
The complaint alleges the three had histories of dating younger female subordinates and used their clout to secure large severance packages for colleagues accused of misconduct. The rest of the board, the complaint said, was beholden to the three directors and were unable to act independently of them.
“Defendants breached their fiduciary duties by using their control over Alphabet and the board to cause the company to cover up credible allegations of sexual misconduct by defendants Rubin and Singhal and by paying Rubin and Singhal millions of dollars in unwarranted severance payments,” the filing said, adding the board members “did not act in good faith” and “acted disloyally toward the company.”
The complaint filed April 11 was the latest to target Alphabet's board over its handling of sexual harassment allegations.
Earlier this year, investors filed two derivative suits in California state court over the same alleged activity, and another Alphabet shareholder in February sued the company for corporate records that relate in part to Alphabet's directors knowledge of misconduct in their ranks.
The four plaintiffs in the latest action said they made a similar demand for documents.
The plaintiffs are represented by Michael J. Barry, Christine M. Mackintosh and Kimberly A. Evans of Grant & Eisenhofer.
The case, captioned New York City Employees' Retirement System v. Page, has been assigned to Vice Chancellor Kathaleen S. McCormick.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250