Opportunity Zone Regulations Unveiled With Strong Investment Appetite in South Florida
A few projects have been pursued, but the deal flow is expected to increase with more details in hand.
April 18, 2019 at 09:54 AM
6 minute read
The long-awaited draft of opportunity zone regulations brought good news to investors as the guidelines give them more leeway in how they can take advantage of the tax-break tool.
In South Florida, the Trump administration move Wednesday likely means an increase in an already healthy appetite to invest in some of the 8,700 zones designated nationally under the 2017 tax overhaul.
The Treasury Department regulations hammer out details on the investment mechanism created in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The program focuses on developing in distressed areas by allowing investors to defer tax payments.
A major change would allow investors to exit an opportunity zone venture by selling the property or business in which they invested. Previously, the exit strategy was limited to selling interest in a qualified opportunity zone fund.
Two Miami attorneys who reviewed the update said the regulations give investors more wiggle room.
“No question,” said Ronald Fieldstone, partner at Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr. “They clarified a lot of things. They want to make it viable. The statute in the prior regs had things that made it more difficult.”
Barry Lapides, a partner at Berger Singerman, added the guidelines clarify how to invest in businesses located in opportunity zones.
Investors essentially can take their capital gains from any venture, real estate or otherwise, and put them into a qualified opportunity zone fund that then, likely through a fund manager, seeks eligible projects.
One fund can include capital gains from multiple investors and invest in multiple projects, which could be real estate and businesses.
The magnitude of the federal income tax break an investor gets depends on how long he keeps his funds into the venture. A five-year investment means 10% of the capital gains won't be taxed, and a seven-year investment means 15% of the capital gains won't be taxed. Also, there's a way to avoid paying tax altogether on capital gains from the opportunity zone investment itself. If an investor keeps his money in an opportunity zone fund for 10 years, then he won't have to pay taxes on the gains once he sells.
In Florida, 427 opportunity zones have been established including 67 in Miami-Dade County, 30 in Broward County and 25 in Palm Beach County, according to Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr.
MONEY IN, MONEY OUT
Under the new guidelines, an investor can exit an opportunity zone by selling stakes in an opportunity zone fund or the underlying business or project.
This is welcome news because OZ funds are seeking funding for multiple purchases, Fieldstone said. Something short of a real estate portfolio sale is possible.
“If I have a hotel, a multifamily, a this or that and I diversify the fund to different geographies, it's going to be hard to find a buyer,” Fieldstone said. With the changes, “you can do each individual asset independently, and you'll get the tax-free effect every time you sell an asset if you have an appreciation.”
Other rules broaden the definition of qualifying businesses in opportunity zones. For instance, investing in an OZ business would be permitted even if the business rents, instead of buys, its location in the opportunity zone.
Formerly, qualifying businesses had to generate at least half of their revenue from their opportunity zone location.
“Some people said, 'That's a real problem because I may set up a business in an opportunity zone and franchise it and have distributorships all over the country, and all of the sudden my revenue is no longer 50% in the zone. It's much less because I expanded the business,' ” Fieldstone said.
This has been expanded to include businesses which can claim at least half of the employee hours are worked from the opportunity zone site or at least half of the payroll is coming from that site.
“These regulations really helped to clarify how people can invest,” Lapides said.
The document setting the guidelines isn't final. Comments will be accepted on the tentative rules, and a public hearing will he held July 9.
ON THE GROUND
Some investors sat on the sidelines waiting for more details, and the federal government shutdown delayed the release. Still, South Florida already has seen interest from developers, and deal flow is expected to grow.
TSG Group and Linéaire Group, both based in Miami, plan to build an 18- to 24-story apartment tower on a 30,000-square-foot vacant property at 1765 N. Miami Ave. in an opportunity zone in Miami's Arts and Entertainment District.
Affiliated Development LLC, based in Fort Lauderdale, is constructing the six-story, 142-unit The Six13 apartment building at 613 NW Third Ave. in Fort Lauderdale's Progresso Village.
Both pursued the opportunity zone projects before the latest round of regulations was released. TSG and Linéaire said they decided to move forward on the real estate purchase to avoid greater competition after publication of the new regulations.
“We saw an opportunity because a lot of people were waiting on the sidelines to see how the regulation was going to come out,” Diego Bonet, Linéaire managing partner, told the Daily Business Review last month. “All the big players were waiting on the sidelines, so we wanted to make sure we were one of the early movers and jump on this before all of the guidance had come out.”
Exactly how the opportunity zone investments will be structured varies by project and developer. Some developers will use the funds only for financing, while others also are benefiting from the tax deferral opportunity.
For example, Affiliated Development is one of the investors putting funds into a qualified opportunity zone fund that is putting money in a qualified business, The Six13 project, and will get the capital gains benefit.
TSG and Linéaire stand to see no tax benefits but expect to be on the receiving end of early opportunity zone funding.
The federal government has projected $100 billion in opportunity zone investments.
Critics have argued the investment mechanism does little to help opportunity zones residents, who might be pushed out by higher housing costs from gentrification.
Some state lawmakers have taken the initiative to address this issue. House Bill 481 would pave a path for developers to get more benefits for investing in opportunity zones in return for social and public benefits.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250