Opportunity Zone Regulations Unveiled With Strong Investment Appetite in South Florida
A few projects have been pursued, but the deal flow is expected to increase with more details in hand.
April 18, 2019 at 09:54 AM
6 minute read
The long-awaited draft of opportunity zone regulations brought good news to investors as the guidelines give them more leeway in how they can take advantage of the tax-break tool.
In South Florida, the Trump administration move Wednesday likely means an increase in an already healthy appetite to invest in some of the 8,700 zones designated nationally under the 2017 tax overhaul.
The Treasury Department regulations hammer out details on the investment mechanism created in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The program focuses on developing in distressed areas by allowing investors to defer tax payments.
A major change would allow investors to exit an opportunity zone venture by selling the property or business in which they invested. Previously, the exit strategy was limited to selling interest in a qualified opportunity zone fund.
Two Miami attorneys who reviewed the update said the regulations give investors more wiggle room.
“No question,” said Ronald Fieldstone, partner at Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr. “They clarified a lot of things. They want to make it viable. The statute in the prior regs had things that made it more difficult.”
Barry Lapides, a partner at Berger Singerman, added the guidelines clarify how to invest in businesses located in opportunity zones.
Investors essentially can take their capital gains from any venture, real estate or otherwise, and put them into a qualified opportunity zone fund that then, likely through a fund manager, seeks eligible projects.
One fund can include capital gains from multiple investors and invest in multiple projects, which could be real estate and businesses.
The magnitude of the federal income tax break an investor gets depends on how long he keeps his funds into the venture. A five-year investment means 10% of the capital gains won't be taxed, and a seven-year investment means 15% of the capital gains won't be taxed. Also, there's a way to avoid paying tax altogether on capital gains from the opportunity zone investment itself. If an investor keeps his money in an opportunity zone fund for 10 years, then he won't have to pay taxes on the gains once he sells.
In Florida, 427 opportunity zones have been established including 67 in Miami-Dade County, 30 in Broward County and 25 in Palm Beach County, according to Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr.
MONEY IN, MONEY OUT
Under the new guidelines, an investor can exit an opportunity zone by selling stakes in an opportunity zone fund or the underlying business or project.
This is welcome news because OZ funds are seeking funding for multiple purchases, Fieldstone said. Something short of a real estate portfolio sale is possible.
“If I have a hotel, a multifamily, a this or that and I diversify the fund to different geographies, it's going to be hard to find a buyer,” Fieldstone said. With the changes, “you can do each individual asset independently, and you'll get the tax-free effect every time you sell an asset if you have an appreciation.”
Other rules broaden the definition of qualifying businesses in opportunity zones. For instance, investing in an OZ business would be permitted even if the business rents, instead of buys, its location in the opportunity zone.
Formerly, qualifying businesses had to generate at least half of their revenue from their opportunity zone location.
“Some people said, 'That's a real problem because I may set up a business in an opportunity zone and franchise it and have distributorships all over the country, and all of the sudden my revenue is no longer 50% in the zone. It's much less because I expanded the business,' ” Fieldstone said.
This has been expanded to include businesses which can claim at least half of the employee hours are worked from the opportunity zone site or at least half of the payroll is coming from that site.
“These regulations really helped to clarify how people can invest,” Lapides said.
The document setting the guidelines isn't final. Comments will be accepted on the tentative rules, and a public hearing will he held July 9.
ON THE GROUND
Some investors sat on the sidelines waiting for more details, and the federal government shutdown delayed the release. Still, South Florida already has seen interest from developers, and deal flow is expected to grow.
TSG Group and Linéaire Group, both based in Miami, plan to build an 18- to 24-story apartment tower on a 30,000-square-foot vacant property at 1765 N. Miami Ave. in an opportunity zone in Miami's Arts and Entertainment District.
Affiliated Development LLC, based in Fort Lauderdale, is constructing the six-story, 142-unit The Six13 apartment building at 613 NW Third Ave. in Fort Lauderdale's Progresso Village.
Both pursued the opportunity zone projects before the latest round of regulations was released. TSG and Linéaire said they decided to move forward on the real estate purchase to avoid greater competition after publication of the new regulations.
“We saw an opportunity because a lot of people were waiting on the sidelines to see how the regulation was going to come out,” Diego Bonet, Linéaire managing partner, told the Daily Business Review last month. “All the big players were waiting on the sidelines, so we wanted to make sure we were one of the early movers and jump on this before all of the guidance had come out.”
Exactly how the opportunity zone investments will be structured varies by project and developer. Some developers will use the funds only for financing, while others also are benefiting from the tax deferral opportunity.
For example, Affiliated Development is one of the investors putting funds into a qualified opportunity zone fund that is putting money in a qualified business, The Six13 project, and will get the capital gains benefit.
TSG and Linéaire stand to see no tax benefits but expect to be on the receiving end of early opportunity zone funding.
The federal government has projected $100 billion in opportunity zone investments.
Critics have argued the investment mechanism does little to help opportunity zones residents, who might be pushed out by higher housing costs from gentrification.
Some state lawmakers have taken the initiative to address this issue. House Bill 481 would pave a path for developers to get more benefits for investing in opportunity zones in return for social and public benefits.
Related stories:
Opportunity Zone Buy Means More Apartments in Miami Arts and Entertainment District
New Fort Lauderdale Apartments in Opportunity Zone Promise Attainable Rents
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250