American Airlines Protecting Internal Documents in Wrongful Death Suit Alleging Discrimination
American Airlines asked the court to block a discovery order that would reveal internal documents to the family of a fired employee who brought a wrongful death suit over his suicide.
April 22, 2019 at 01:32 PM
4 minute read
The Fourth District Court of Appeal agreed to temporarily keep internal American Airlines Inc. documents out of discovery in a wrongful death case, following the suicide of a manager at Miami International Airport's cargo department days after his firing.
Family of Michael Cimino claim he was bullied by a supervisor and pointed to an internal AA investigation into possible racial discrimination, but the court ruled releasing those documents could cause irreparable harm to the airline.
The 1,800-page report goes beyond Cimino's case, stemming from a human resources probe prompted by anonymous letters. The letters petitioned to remove alleged bullies, including Cimino's Hispanic supervisor, who allegedly discriminated against non-Hispanics. The family's lawsuit against AA and MIA supervisor Edwin Diaz claim he also bullied Cimino, threatening his pension, insurance and even criminal charges against him.
Cimino, referred to in the complaint as an “Anglo,” had spent 34 years at AA without a problem but was fired over alleged time card fraud. The family claim Cimino's firing was a pretext, as Diaz supposedly showed a pattern of racial discrimination, “hates Anglos” and had fired other white employees to replace them with Hispanic staff. The suit claims Diaz hired Cimino's replacement before accusing him of wrongdoing, and claims Cimino had told AA's mental health program he was depressed.
AA did not respond to a request for comment. Its South Florida attorneys Jennifer Olmedo-Rodriguez, Jesse H. Diner, Kelly H. Kolb and Mary B. Ricke of Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney in Fort Lauderdale and Miami declined comment.
The airline has repeatedly denied liability, pointing out that its policies prohibit discrimination and claiming that any discriminatory motive was mixed with a genuine reason — Cimino's alleged dishonesty and falsification of documents. The way AA tells it, Cimino didn't properly report the bullying or take advantage of the company's preventive procedures.
But those affirmative defenses fall under Faragher-Ellerth case law, according to plaintiffs lawyer Chris Kleppin of Glasser & Kleppin — meaning they cancel out any privilege.
“If you're affirmatively going to state that in the court case, then you can't say, 'Oh, by the way, everything we did in the investigation is privileged and you don't get to see it. You just have to take our word for this,' “ said Kleppin, who's working on the case with Plantation lawyer Chelsea A. Lewis and Coral Springs lawyer Robert A. Rosenberg.
The way Kleppin sees it, the issue is already settled law.
“The federal courts have run over any employers' attempts to say these types of documents are privileged. There are far fewer opinions in state court on this issue, so we think that the state court judges on the panel were certainly less familiar with this issue than federal judges,” Kleppin said.
The anonymous letters link Cimino's suicide with bullying allegations and detail two other attempted suicides by employees, according to Kleppin. But because Broward Circuit Judge Patti Englander Henning hadn't looked at the documents, the Fourth DCA couldn't rule on privilege. It quashed the discovery order, asking the trial court to review the documents.
Fourth DCA Judge Alan O. Forst wrote the opinion, backed by Martha C. Warner and Mark W. Klingensmith.
Cimino's family will ask for more than $1 million for their “needless” loss, according to Kleppin, as Cimino was a high-level employee with benefits and a retirement fund. The lawsuit seeks compensation, punitive damages, future wages and attorney fees, and asks AA to add equal employment policies.
Read the full court opinion:
Related stories:
Court Reinstates Judgments Against Nationwide Pools Owners Accused of Scam
No New Trial for Florida Woman Caught Hiring Fake Hit Man on 'Cops' Episode
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHolland & Knight Hires Former Davis Wright Tremaine Managing Partner in Seattle
3 minute readRFK Jr. Will Keep Affiliations With Morgan & Morgan, Other Law Firms If Confirmed to DHHS
3 minute readPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readLocal Boutique Expands Significantly, Hiring Litigator Who Won $63M Verdict Against City of Miami Commissioner
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Who Are the Judges Assigned to Challenges to Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order?
- 2Litigators of the Week: A Directed Verdict Win for Cisco in a West Texas Patent Case
- 3Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 4Womble Bond Becomes First Firm in UK to Roll Out AI Tool Firmwide
- 5Will a Market Dominated by Small- to Mid-Cap Deals Give Rise to a Dark Horse US Firm in China?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250