Outback Steakhouse Accused of Underpaying Servers on Minimum-Wage Law
Tampa-based Outback Steakhouse is accused of violating the minimum wage for time spent on nonservice tasks.
April 22, 2019 at 04:35 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Connecticut Law Tribune
A prospective class action lawsuit that potentially affects hundreds of servers at nine Outback Steakhouse restaurants in Connecticut claims the Tampa-based chain violated the minimum-wage law for time spent performing nonservice duties.
The lawsuit filed April 18 in Hartford Superior Court alleges servers regularly performed 30 to 60 minutes of nonservice work each day at $6.38 an hour. The state set the $6.38 minimum wage for service duties such as waiting tables because restaurant workers can make up the difference in tips.
The lawsuit alleges the employees should have been getting the state's $10.10 minimum wage for nonservice work such as general cleaning and stocking duties.
Hartford-based Hayber Law Firm filed suit on behalf of former Newington, Connecticut, server Ryan Reutenauer, who worked for the eatery from February to June 2017. Richard Hayber said the restaurant owes Reutenauer several thousands of dollars.
The class covers hundreds of servers who worked at any of the nine Connecticut restaurants since April 4, 2017.
“We are taking about hundreds of thousands of dollars per restaurant. That is my educated guess, although we will have the exact number through discovery,” Hayber said Monday.
The defendants are Outback Steakhouse of Florida LLC, its parent company Bloomin' Brands Inc. and OSI Restaurants Partners LLC, a sister company and subsidiary of Bloomin' Brands. All three companies are based in Tampa.
As of Monday afternoon, the defendants had not retained legal counsel for the lawsuit. Bloomin' Brands spokeswoman Cathie Koch and chief legal officer Joseph Kadow did not respond to requests for comments by deadline.
Hayber said it's up to out-of-state corporations to be up-to-date on the wage laws in states where they do business. He said the defendants in this case were not.
“National corporations that come into our state and hire minimum-wage workers have to read our laws and obey them, and these laws are well-documented,” Hayber said. Minimum wage laws “are supposed to be written on a poster, required to be hung in the restaurants.”
Hayber said he will learn via discovery whether the posters were in place and if Outback differentiated between service hours and nonservice hours. If there was no differentiation, the $10.10 hourly rate applies. “The law is very strict in this regard,” he said.
“I believe that lawsuits on behalf of minimum-wage workers are some of the most important lawsuits our court system can handle,” Hayber said. “These workers are really the most vulnerable people in our economy. They are typically young and have the least resources and knowledge of the laws.”
The lawsuit seeks certification as a class and monetary damages for unpaid wages.
Assisting Hayber is colleague Thomas Durkin.
Read More:
Chip's Restaurant Servers Get Class Certification in Minimum Wage Suit
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSpecial Counsel Jack Smith Prepares Final Report as Trump Opposes Its Release
4 minute readNorth Carolina Courts Switch to Digital, Face Extreme Weather in 2024
'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250