Florida Bill Aims to Cure Balloting Woes, Streamline Counts
One bill aims to smooth out the absentee balloting schedule and require more training for verifying ballot signatures.
April 22, 2019 at 01:17 PM
4 minute read
Florida lawmakers are considering several measures to address the state's long-documented election woes.
Problems with ballot counting — from the controversial 2000 presidential election to the 2018 statewide election — prompted Spring Hill Republican Rep. Blaise Ingoglia and two House committees to draft a bill to streamline the absentee balloting schedule.
One bill aims to streamline the absentee balloting schedule and require more training for verifying ballot signatures.
The bill would extend the period that absentee ballots can be requested from 35 days ahead of the election to 40 days. It also would move up the deadline for requesting such ballots from six days ahead of the election to 10 days. Elections officials would have until eight days before the election to mail out the ballots.
The deadline for returning the ballots would remain the same: they must arrive by mail by 7 p.m. on Election Day. However, the legislation also would call for additional drop-off facilities for voters to bring ballots in person.
Okaloosa County Supervisor of Elections Paul Lux said Ingoglia's bill addresses concerns that people continually miss the deadline for mailing ballots back.
“The postal service has been telling us: 'You need to mail your stuff sooner,'” Lux said. “They cannot guarantee first-class delivery any sooner than five days.”
Although voters requested more than 3.4 million mail-in ballots during the 2018 general election, nearly 850,000 were not returned, according to state data. More than 6,600 ballots that were mailed ahead of the election in 65 counties were not counted because they were not received by Election Day, according to the Department of State.
Despite seeming advantages to voters, Democratic Party of Florida said the bill was tantamount to “voter suppression” because it would confuse voters and represent “a significant disruption in how Floridians vote by mail in the critical days before an election.”
Still, the bill received bipartisan support from Florida State Association of Supervisors of Elections, comprised of election supervisors from the state's 67 counties.
To decrease the workload at the tail end of an election, the bill allows for starting the count of mail-in votes one week earlier than in current law, in which it can start no sooner than 15 days before an election.
“Getting towards an election you see a bottleneck,” Ingoglia said. “There's no reason not to start canvassing those ballots earlier and getting those ballots knocked out.”
Lux said he does not believe an election would be compromised by word leaking out of what candidate held a lead, because the vote's integrity already is protected by law. Releasing results before the closing of polls is a third-degree felony.
Brenda Snipes, who received harsh criticism from Republican politicians for her handling of the recount in Broward County and who later resigned as elections supervisor, said the bill would benefit heavily populated counties that receive large amounts of mail-in ballots.
One of the motivating factors for the legislation was the chaotic 2018 election, when the governor and U.S. Senate races were too close to call and prompted recounts.
Federal lawsuits mounted as officials raced to count and recount ballots by mandated deadlines while dealing with faulty machines, in some cases, and with allegations that ballots were mishandled. President Donald Trump suggested in tweets that Democrats were stealing the election. Protesters alleged fraud and massed at vote-counting centers in South Florida.
Eventually, Republicans Rick Scott in the Senate race and Ron DeSantis in the governor's race were declared winners, and police said there were no allegations of electoral wrongdoing.
Criticism and lawsuits in 2018 focused heavily on the Broward operation, where post-election vote-counting dragged on longer than in most counties, and on Palm Beach County, which suffered breakdowns to outdated machines. That drew comparisons to the unruly 2000 election when lawyers for Republican George Bush and Democrat Al Gore squared off in high-stakes challenges over Florida balloting.
Ingoglia's bill also calls for mandatory training in signature verification among election staff and requires election supervisors to immediately contact voters if a problem with a signature is discovered.
Ellis Rua reports for the Associated Press.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readAs Unpredictability Rises, Gov't Law Practices Expect Trump Bump. Especially in Florida
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250