Miami Firm Lands Victory for Ex-Mayor in Fight Over Hospital's Use of Public Money
Martin B. Goldberg of Lash & Goldberg in Miami lands a Florida Supreme Court victory for his client Nancy Epps, a Daytona Beach resident and former Ponce Inlet mayor who objected to tax dollars being spent to build a hospital miles outside the tax district's geographic boundaries.
April 23, 2019 at 04:12 PM
4 minute read
The Florida Supreme Court reined in a special tax district, ruling that state law gives Halifax Medical Center no right to build a hospital outside district boundaries.
Miami-based Lash & Goldberg partner Martin B. Goldberg brought the case for Daytona Beach resident and former Ponce Inlet Mayor Nancy Epps, arguing Halifax couldn't use money from taxpayers in one district to build and run a 96-bed hospital in another.
Epps sued in 2016, claiming the project violated Florida's Constitution and that it wouldn't serve the residents who were footing the bill. According to the complaint, the venture is estimated to cost between $60 million and $75 million, most of which will come from taxes and public funds.
Ironically, Halifax had spent six figures defending the suit within its first year. The company has been designated a special tax district since 1925, created by the Florida Legislature to develop medical facilities across its district, which covers various areas in Volusia County. Despite legal red tape, the project is underway at Interstate 4 and State Road 472 in Deltona.
Defense attorneys Elliot H. Shercker, Brigid F. Cech Samole and Katherine M. Clemente of Greenberg Traurig in Miami did not immediately respond to requests for comment. But Halifax has pushed back throughout, arguing it had the authority to build the hospital and has operated outside the bounds of its tax district for more than 30 years.
Halifax also argued the Legislature removed geographic restrictions from its operations in 1979, and pointed to the Enabling Act and an Interlocal Act, which it claims allow broad expansion powers.
The case prompted amicus briefs or “friends of the court” filings from other special tax districts, including South Broward Hospital District, known as Memorial Healthcare System. Like Halifax, they worried the court could block them from operating outside their districts altogether.
The high court analyzed the acts and sided with Volusia Circuit Judge Christopher France, who'd denied Halifax's bond validation. But it reserved judgment on the broader issue of Halifax's powers, finding the court wasn't the right forum for policy decisions about special districts.
The way Goldberg sees it, the ruling validates what Epps has been saying for years.
“Halifax's extraordinary claim that it can build a hospital in Deltona has always been totally unfounded,” he said. “This decision underscores the important roles citizens and the courts undertake when entities such as Halifax attempt to overstep and ignore the boundaries of their authority.”
Goldberg worked on the case with Jason A. Coe, Jonathan L. Williams, Nicholas A. Ortiz and Christopher K. Smith.
It's not a home run, as the Florida House of Representatives passed a bill Wednesday allowing Halifax to use the money it needs for the hospital. The bill isn't final until confirmed by the state Senate and signed by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis.
Epps said she's pleased with the decision.
“I reiterate my call for Halifax to stop spending funds on constructing a hospital in Deltona and to turn its attention back toward providing health care to its own residents,” Epps said.
Justice Alan Lawson wrote the unanimous opinion.
Read the full court opinion:
Related stories:
Florida Paradise Offers Wealthy Developers a Big Trump Tax Break
Moncrief Claims Lawmakers Chip Away at Land Preservation Money
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMiami Firm Reaches $1.9M Settlement for Protester's Injuries, Pursues Class Action for Others
Trending Stories
- 1Stevens & Lee Names New Delaware Shareholder
- 2U.S. Supreme Court Denies Trump Effort to Halt Sentencing
- 3From CLO to President: Kevin Boon Takes the Helm at Mysten Labs
- 4How Law Schools Fared on California's July 2024 Bar Exam
- 5'Discordant Dots': Why Phila. Zantac Judge Rejected Bid for His Recusal
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250