Livestock Owner Not to Blame for Crash Caused by Runaway Cows, Court Rules
Ernest Carnahan sued after crashing into a group of cows gathered on an unlit Port St. Lucie road at 4:45 a.m.
April 24, 2019 at 02:25 PM
3 minute read
The Fourth District Court of Appeal wasn't mooved by a driver's plea for damages Wednesday when it affirmed a jury verdict finding a Florida livestock owner wasn't responsible for a collision involving his cows, who had escaped from an unlocked gate in the middle of the night.
Years of beef between driver Ernest Carnahan and the cows' owner, Robert Norvell, began at 4:45 a.m. on an unlit Port St. Lucie street in 2012. Carnahan wasn't expecting to find a hazardous congregation of cows in the road, according to the lawsuit, which sought damages and costs over the crash.
The lawsuit claimed Carnahan was hospitalized and suffered serious pain, disability, disfigurement, mental anguish and loss of earnings.
Carnahan blamed Norvell for leaving the gate to the pasture unlatched, suing under the Warren Act, which governs liability for livestock owners. But in 2017, jurors found Norvell wasn't legally at fault.
Carnahan pushed back at the trial court for blocking evidence that the cows had a history of escaping their pastures, having gone on multiple adventures over 30 years. But the court found those breakouts were prompted by hurricanes, hunters, fallen trees and vandals — not by an unlocked gate — and Carnahan wasn't able to produce evidence suggesting otherwise.
Carnahan's lawyers, Nicholas Shannin and Carol Shannin of the Shannin Law Firm in Orlando, said they're reviewing the decision for potential further action.
“On behalf of Mr. Carnahan, we are appreciative of the appellate review and opinion, even though we are disappointed in the result,” Nicholas Shannin said.
Norvell's lawyers, Caryn Bellus and Barbara Fox of Kubicki Draper in Miami, did not respond to a request for comment before deadline.
Fourth DCA Judge Spencer D. Levine wrote the opinion, backed by Judges Carole Y. Taylor and Cory J. Ciklin.
Read the court opinion:
|More appeals stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDisbarred Attorney Alleges ADA Violations in Lawsuit Against Miami-Dade Judges
3 minute readDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readChicago Midsize Firm Will Combine With Miami Boutique To Form Antitrust Powerhouse
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How Amy Harris Leverages Diversity to Give UMB Financial a Competitive Edge
- 2Pa. Judicial Nominee Advances While Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden Picks
- 3The Unraveling of Sean Combs: How Legislation from the #MeToo Movement Brought Diddy Down
- 4Publication of Information Regarding Client Matters
- 5The State of Cost Recovery — Post COVID
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250