Miami Produce Center Promises to Transform, Likely Gentrify Allapattah
The City Commission is set to vote on a development agreement and zoning and land-use changes for the 8-acre venture.
April 24, 2019 at 02:56 PM
4 minute read
An architecturally distinctive project that would redevelop the old Miami Produce Center in Allapattah could become the city's latest big development. Robert Wennett wants to redevelop the three warehouses at the Miami Produce Center, once a bustling location for the wholesale produce trade, and build eight buildings. Much like Wennett's marquee project, the 1111 Lincoln garage in Miami Beach, this one also would be architecturally unique. The Miami Produce Center will have residences, offices, a hotel, retail and educational space — with the buildings standing on stilts reaching heights up to 19 stories. Danish architect Bjarke Ingels of the Bjarke Ingels Group, who is known for nontraditional takes, designed the Miami Produce Center. The 8.25-acre site is bounded by Northwest 22nd and 21st streets and 13th and 12th avenues. The City Commission on Thursday is set to vote on the Miami Produce Center. If approved, the developer would work afterward with city administrators to hammer out development details. The commission is considering a development agreement and two ordinances that would loosen industrial regulations for the site. Wennett's Miami Beach-based UIA Management LLC is asking the city to change the future land use to general commercial and the zoning to an urban core open transect zone. The general land use designation would allow for high-density residential development, commercial uses and industrial uses such as light manufacturing, wholesale and distribution activities, according to city records. |
Details
The Miami Produce Center would be more than 1.35 million square feet with 1,200 residences, 227 hotel rooms, 230,886 square feet of offices, 96,976 square feet of commercial space, 54,171 square feet for an educational use and 1,078 parking spots, according to city records. Renderings and plans submitted to the city show the three warehouses bustling with business and the eight new buildings above them. Four residential towers would have seven floors above 12 empty levels and be supported by stilts or columns. The other buildings would have floors starting at the fourth level. Two warehouses with a combined 74,800 square feet would house restaurants and the third at 54,171 square feet would have the school. The Miami Produce Center developer is proposing 600 co-living residential units, or up to four rooms sharing a bathroom and a kitchen. Wennett has applied for a special area plan, which is allowed under the Miami 21 zoning code. Developers must contribute a public benefit such as infrastructure and in return can deviate from zoning limits on height and density. The city also gets more input on special area plan projects. They normally cover more than 9 acres, and an exception would cover the smaller acreage for the Miami Produce Center. Wennett, through his Miami Produce Center LLC, bought the site for $16 million in 2016. The city planning staff and the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board have approved the land-use change and recommended approving the zoning change with conditions. |
Jobs, Jobs, Gentrification
The project is projected to create more than 5,500 construction jobs generating more than $3 million in income, according to an economic analysis submitted by the developer. Once finished, Miami Produce Center would create the equivalent of 1,482 full-time jobs but most of them are to be part-time jobs. City staff said it has "considerable concerns" about nearby residents being displaced through gentrification. "For residents who do not own their homes, the threat of dislocation seems more ominous," deputy planning director Jeremy Calleros Gauger wrote in an analysis on the requested land use change. Most nearby residents are low- to moderate-income renters. Even though the Miami Produce Center promises to offer some workforce housing for renters making 140% of the area median income, there's no guarantee the project will accommodate residents below that mark, according to Gauger's analysis. "With the local community living well below this standard, this standard assumes that residents will be moving in from other communities to occupy these units because the local community lives at far below the" area median income, he wrote.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1Ex-CFO of San Francisco Law Firms Pleads Guilty to $1.3M Embezzlement Scheme, DOJ Announces
- 2What Does Ohio Supreme Court's Opioid Decision Mean for Public Nuisance Claims?
- 3Bucking Industry Trend, Sidley Austin Elects Biggest Class of Partners in Firm History
- 4US Judge Throws Out Sale of Infowars to The Onion. But That's Not the End of the Road for Sandy Hook Families
- 5‘Really Deflating’: Judges React to Biden Threat to Veto New Judgeships Bill
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250