Opportunity Zone Gentrification: Federal Government Signals It Wants to Track the Results
The Trump administration has signaled it wants to review a potential downfall in opportunity zones — gentrification. But whether the government's initiative would work depends on whom you ask.
April 25, 2019 at 01:18 PM
4 minute read
Criticism that opportunity zone tax breaks will benefit well-heeled developers and investors at the expense of low-income residents has been heard by the federal government.
The Trump administration has taken a preliminary step to address complaints that the zones are little more than a tax vehicle for gentrification. But whether the latest initiative actually would halt gentrification and truly help communities depends on whom you ask.
The Treasury Department issued a seven-page notice April 16 asking stakeholders to suggest how to measure the community impact from opportunity zone investments.
“I think it's a starting point,” Miami attorney Ronald Fieldstone said.
Once the data is collected, the Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr partner said the government can reevaluate the program's community impact.
“This tracking device won't change the legal requirements under the tax code, but what it will do is at least gather information for the government to determine if this has been a successful program that they possibly will extend, change or modify,” Fieldstone said.
Miami attorney Steven Hadjilogiou isn't as convinced this will help.
“There's no teeth to it,” said the McDermott Will & Emery partner. “They are just collecting data. They are not changing the rules of how these zones work. You can still have your major companies coming in and gentrifying an area. These rules don't change anything that they would otherwise be doing. They are just collecting data to show or to attempt to show what a great piece of legislation they enacted.”
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 created opportunity zones to revitalize economically distressed communities by encouraging investment through tax breaks.
Investors can defer paying taxes on their capital gains from any venture by putting the money into a qualified opportunity zone fund. The fund, through a fund manager, seeks eligible real estate and business projects in the 8,750 opportunity zones across the U.S.
The amount of a tax break depends on how long investors keep money in the opportunity zone fund.
The law includes no requirements for benefits for the existing residents in opportunity zones.
South Florida's 122 opportunity zones include some areas already undergoing significant redevelopment.
Fieldstone said some of the tracking requirements the federal government could impose would record the number of new jobs created in an opportunity zone as well as the amount and types of community benefits, such as job training, infrastructure work and new affordable housing.
“That's the information gathering because they want the program to be financially viable to investors, but at the same time they'd like to see if it's really encouraging economic growth and investment in distressed communities,” Fieldstone said.
Despite the gentrification criticism, the opportunity zone law still is good news for these areas, added Hadjilogiou.
“I think overall it is a benefit to the community because it is encouraging investment in these areas and it is creating jobs,” he said. “Better than doing nothing. That's for sure.”
Related stories:
Opportunity Zone Regulations Unveiled With Strong Investment Appetite in South Florida
South Florida Opportunity Zone Investments Strong Even Before Latest Guidelines
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 2Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 3Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 4Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
- 5Zoom Faces Intellectual Property Suit Over AI-Based Augmented Video Conferencing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250