Cancer-Survivor Judge Steps Down From Case Over Insurer's 'Barbaric' Denial of Treatment
Cole, Scott & Kissane managing partner Richard Cole is the named plaintiff in a putative class action lawsuit against United Healthcare Insurance Co., which denied him coverage for proton beam radiation therapy to treat cancer.
April 29, 2019 at 03:48 PM
5 minute read
A federal judge who survived prostate cancer has stepped down from a putative class action lawsuit over a health insurance company's “immoral and barbaric” denial of a radiation treatment.
U.S. District Judge Robert Scola on Monday recused himself from Richard Cole v. United Healthcare Insurance Co. in the Southern District of Florida — a case in which prominent Miami litigator and Cole, Scott & Kissane managing partner Richard Cole is the named plaintiff.
The judge wrote that his own life-saving experience with the treatment at the heart of the lawsuit—proton radiation, which United Healthcare Co. does not cover—plus a friend's six-figure medical bills for cancer care prevented him “from deciding this case fairly and impartially.”
Scola wrote that his friend “fortunately … had the resources to pay $150,000 for the treatment,” but that United Healthcare agreed to reimburse him “only upon threat of litigation.”
“To deny a patient this treatment, if it is available, is immoral and barbaric,” wrote Scola, who did not respond to requests for comment by press time.
|Read the order:
Cole, the plaintiff in the case, helps lead Florida's largest personal injury law firm. He was diagnosed with prostate cancer in April 2018. He filed a putative class action complaint against United Healthcare on April 3 after the company refused to cover proton beam radiation therapy used to reduce tumors.
United Healthcare has said it declined coverage because the therapy is experimental and unproven.
Spokeswoman Maria Gordon Shydlo said Monday the company “bases its medical policies and coverage decisions—including for proton beam therapy—on the prevailing published clinical and scientific evidence.”
The company responded to a story by CNN in August 2018 that there is “no credible evidence that proton beam therapy is safer or more effective than the proven and covered treatments that are the standard of care for cervical cancer.”
But Cole's suit suggests otherwise and alleges the company has maintained a uniform policy of denying coverage for proton therapy—a move that Cole says has cost him about $85,000 out of pocket. It also alleges the treatment is well-accepted in the medical community because it “minimizes collateral damage to healthy tissue around the tumor.”
“The claim is for breach of fiduciary duty, and we're alleging that United Healthcare did not act solely in the interest of [Cole],” said plaintiffs counsel Stephanie Casey, partner at Colson Hicks Eidson in Coral Gables. ”There's nothing experimental or investigational about proton beam radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer.”
|'Cancer-free'
Cole said he repeatedly challenged United, but the insurer denied him at every turn and at one point used an expert who “wasn't even an oncologist” to justify its coverage decision.
“I don't think they took my condition or treatment as seriously as they should have,” he said Monday.
With his claims rejected, Cole footed the medical bills and underwent treatment at the Miami Cancer Institute.
“I'm glad to report that I finished the treatment in about October of last year,” he said. “I have gone back twice now for additional studies, and I am cancer-free.”
The suit names as potential class members any United Healthcare policy holders denied similar coverage. It aims to have the insurer reprocess all claims nationwide for proton beam radiation therapy to treat prostate cancer, and make decisions on a case-by-case basis, instead of issuing blanket denials.
Cole said Monday he would donate any award from the case to the Miami Cancer Institute, where he underwent treatment.
The case is not the first time a South Florida lawyer has filed suit against an insurance company over treatment.
In 2017, after Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida Inc. denied his wife's claim, Coral Springs attorney Mitchel Chusid filed a class action lawsuit to compel the company to cover Zejula, a drug manufactured to treat relapsed ovarian cancer patients.
“We were able to get Blue Cross and Blue Shield to approve Zejula [for coverage],” Chusid said. “I think it's despicable that these insurance companies have the power to play God and control medication that could save people's lives.”
Now, a new attorney-piloted suit is in the spotlight.
And the federal jurist who stepped down became the second judge to recuse himself from the case. Scola's recusal followed one by U.S. District Judge Federico Moreno, who stepped down from the litigation because of his friendship with the plaintiff.
The case is now assigned to U.S. District Judge Ursula Ungaro.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Trending Stories
- 1How Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
- 2On the Move and After Hours: Brach Eichler; Cooper Levenson; Marshall Dennehey; Archer; Sills Cummis
- 3Review of Ex-parte orders by the Appellate Division
- 4'Confusion Where Previously There Was Clarity': NJ Supreme Court Should Void Referral Fee Ethics Opinion
- 5How Amy Harris Leverages Diversity to Give UMB Financial a Competitive Edge
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250