Plantation Law Firm Files Suit Against Boeing Over Ethiopian Airlines Crash
Plantation firm Velasquez Dolan and Arias is plaintiff counsel in a suit against aviation manufacturer Boeing Corp. and plane sensor designer Rosemount Aerospace Inc. over an Ethiopian Airlines crash in March that killed all passengers and crew on board.
April 29, 2019 at 04:54 PM
4 minute read
Plantation attorney Carlos A. Velasquez, partner at Velasquez Dolan Arias, has launched the first in a string of litigation that could spell turbulence for Chicago aircraft maker Boeing Corp. and plane sensor manufacturer Rosemount Aerospace Inc. over an Ethiopian Airlines crash in March.
Flight ET 302 crashed minutes after it left Ethiopian soil March 10, killing everyone on board. Questions have since swirled about whether the tragedy was preventable as it bore eerie similarities to a Lion Air crash in 2018. Both involved the same Boeing 737 Max 8 model, equipped with a new safety feature that allegedly wasn't in the instruction manual or mentioned to pilots.
Velasquez's client represents the estate of Helen Waithira Karanja, who died in the crash on her way to collect her daughter from boarding school in Nairobi, Kenya, and bring her home for good. Karanja was a Kenyan citizen but lived and worked in Vienna, Austria.
“As you can imagine, her daughter Charlotte, who is now 13 years old, is just devastated about the loss of her mom,” said Velasquez, who's in Kenya meeting with new and prospective clients who lost family to the disaster.
The plane was equipped with a heavier, more powerful engine, according to the wrongful death lawsuit in the Northern District of Illinois. That changed its aerodynamic balance, causing the aircraft to raise its nose upwards — or pitch-up, in pilot speak — which can stall the plane, according to the filing. The suit alleges Boeing came up with a fix, installing technology that could read data from the plane's nose and automatically push it back down again, stabilizing the plane.
Velasquez's client alleges that sensor was defective and that it incorrectly concluded the nose was too high, pushing the plane into a nose dive. The suit claims pilots didn't know about that safety feature and therefore weren't able to properly combat its effects.
The flight took off from Addis Ababa Bole International Airport at 8:38 a.m. and went dark about six minutes later.
Boeing declined to comment on the case but has temporarily grounded its 737 Max 8 fleet in response to public concern.
Karanja's family accuse Boeing of negligence, product liability, failure to warn and civil conspiracy, claiming the company rushed the approval process for its new model, downplaying hazards and safety concerns to get a competitive edge. The plaintiff accuses co-defendant Rosemount Aerospace of negligence and strict liability for its role in designing the “Angle of Attack” sensor. Rosemount's parent company, United Technologies, declined comment.
Meanwhile, Velasquez appears to be gearing to represent more plaintiffs. The Broward litigator specializes in aviation, personal injury and wrongful death litigation, and has won million-dollar verdicts for plane and helicopter crash victims.
“When somebody has wronged somebody else, be it an individual, a corporation or a government agency, I think it's important that it be shown that they're responsible for the action and that the families that have been wronged be adequately compensated under the law,” he said.
The Ethiopian Aviation Administration has gathered a committee and enlisted help from other countries including the U.S. and France, according to Velasquez, who expects to file more lawsuits in the coming weeks.
Read the full complaint:
Related stories:
Miami, Chicago Attorneys Suing Boeing in Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 Crash
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Brought Under NYC Gender Violence Law, Ruling Claims Barred Under State Measure
No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
5 minute readSecond DCA Greenlights USF Class Certification on COVID-19 College Tuition Refunds
3 minute readFlorida Law Firm Sued for $35 Million Over Alleged Role in Acquisition Deal Collapse
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Orrick Loses 10-Lawyer Team to Herbert Smith in Germany
- 2‘The US Market Is Critical’: KPMG’s Former Head of Global Legal Services On the Legal Arm of the Big Four Firm Entering the US
- 3Justice Marguerite Grays Elevated to Co-Chair Panel That Advises on Commercial Division
- 4McDermott Continues UK Growth With Another Partner Hire in London
- 52 Texas Lawyers Vie for Prominent Post: 2025-2026 Election
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250