Class Action Advances Against Nova Southeastern Dentists Over Sterilization Breach
Jay Cohen represents the lead plaintiff, alleging Nova Southeastern University dentists exposed her child to bloodborne diseases like HIV and hepatitis B and C by using unsterilized equipment.
April 30, 2019 at 01:29 PM
4 minute read
Broward Circuit Judge Nicholas Lopane gave the green light to a class-action lawsuit that alleges Nova Southeastern University's post-graduate orthodontic clinic risked patients contracting blood borne diseases, like HIV and hepatitis B and C, by failing to properly sterilize equipment.
Davie resident TIffany Aguero, the mother of one patient, sued for negligence in December 2018 after she and about 1,100 others received a letter from NSU saying that they or their children might have been affected by a breach in protocol at one clinic.
“We discovered there was an inconsistency in the prescribed sterilization protocols,” the letter said. “Our records indicate that you were one of the patients who may have been exposed to this deviation in protocol.”
Fort Lauderdale lawyer Jay Cohen of Cohen, Blostein & Ayala represents Anguero and more than 25 others who got the letter, and who he says suffered the emotional distress of wondering if they had contracted a disease.
So far, none of Cohen's clients — most of whom are children — have tested positive for a disease. But in his view, the breach is unacceptable.
“When a parent gets this letter and is advised that their child may have contracted such a horrible virus, it was devastating to them,” Cohen said. “Most of them when I met with them were still exhibiting the anxiety and distress over what this could have meant to their children.”
According to Cohen, many of his clients are worried about future medical and dental visits.
NSU and its lawyer, Evan Marowitz of Cole, Scott & Kissane in Fort Lauderdale, declined to comment on the case. But the university had moved to dismiss, arguing that the negligence case should have instead been brought under the medical malpractice umbrella.
“The plaintiff notably does not call the claims what they are under Florida law — claims for dental malpractice,” NSU's motion said.
According to Cohen, if the defense had succeeded, the plaintiffs would have faced a higher bar and their damages would have been capped.
Properly sterilizing equipment requires an autoclave — a strong heated container used to hold chemical reactions, high pressure and soaring temperatures — which can sterilize objects with steam. Without that process, patients risk being introduced to deadly viruses lingering on equipment.
Cohen alleges that some of the students and graduate dentists, hygienists and orthodontists were instead disinfecting equipment that had potentially contacted saliva, gums and blood — a violation of basic procedure.
“When you go into an operation in an operating room, they're not wiping down the equipment being used on the next patient,” Cohen said. “They have new equipment that completely meets all the standards for sterilization before use.”
Read the full complaint:
Cohen said he suspects the students and graduates might have been spread too thin, lacking the proper equipment to ensure proper sterilization procedures while rushing to meet patient demand and pressure from management.
The lawsuit also displays an internal letter from NSU to students, saying that “students are having difficulty sterilizing their handpieces when they run late during the morning clinic session.” The letter goes on to tell students they'll be required to buy a second handpiece for $650 to use while their first is being sterilized, and a $100 bur block for storing equipment.
Now that Cohen has the go-ahead, he said he'll investigate how long NSU waited before sending the letters, how it has dealt with inspections and recommendations for sterilization and other procedures, and whether the breach was limited to the orthodontic clinic — one of several clinics NSU operates.
Cohen handled a similar class action against Broward General Medical Center, alleging that a nurse in a cardiac stress lab had reused single-use equipment. That litigation settled for $14 million, so Cohen aims to seek a similar amount in damages in this case.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
3 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readDisbarred Attorney Alleges ADA Violations in Lawsuit Against Miami-Dade Judges
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250