$20M Settlement Would Revive Miami's Stalled Watson Island Makeover
The Miami City Commission will be asked to approve a settlement that would allow construction of hotels. stores and a garage on the island off downtown Miami.
May 03, 2019 at 06:02 PM
4 minute read
A long-stalled commercial makeover envisioned for Miami's Watson Island might be revived after years in litigation limbo.
The city plans a closed-door session Wednesday on a proposed $20 million settlement with Flagstone Island Gardens LLC, which would allow developer Mehmet Bayraktar to resume construction. His company won bidding in 2001 to build a megayacht marina with hotels and retail
The city-owned property lease offered 10.8 acres of land and 13.35 acres of adjacent submerged land on the northwest side of the island along MacArthur Causeway. The Jungle Island attraction and Miami Children's Museum are on the largely undeveloped island with stunning views of the Miami skyline and Miami Beach.
Flagstone Island Gardens finished its 50-slip megayacht marina but not the landside segment. The rest of the project is poised to rise, if the settlement is approved.
City commissioners, staff members and attorneys are set to meet Wednesday, and the City Commission is poised for an up-or-down vote Thursday.
The agreement calls for the city to pay Flagstone Island Gardens $5 million upfront and $2.5 million payments in the next fiscal year and the year after. The city also would erase $10 million in rent that otherwise would be due over 10 years.
The city and its outside counsel didn't respond to requests for comment by deadline.
The settlement would eliminate a trial on Flagstone's claim for damages against the city.
Flagstone won a major portion of its case last year when Miami-Dade Circuit Judge William Thomas ruled the company complied with city agreements and started work by deadline. The city was found at fault for delaying approval of a project adjustment and then ending Flagstone's lease on the deadline question.
The city and Flagstone signed off on the development agreement in 2003 after voters two years earlier approved the lease and development of the waterfront site. The project stalled for some time during the real estate market crash.
Once it was revived, Flagstone sought to tweak the look of the garage from a seven-story structure to less conspicuous parking spread throughout the project footprint of the project, all in an effort to comply with the Miami 21 zoning code, Flagstone attorney Eugene Stearns said Friday.
In his order, Thomas said the city staff found the parking change desirable, and planners kept telling Flagstone that approval was forthcoming. Years passed.
Thomas noted the Coalition Against Causeway Chaos submitted multiple letters to the city in early 2017 raising issues with the major use special permit.
“CACC was quite effective. In fact, the City Commission, which is supposed to play an appellate role in the modification process, suspended the normal administrative process, as it relates to Flagstone, and decided that the commission, rather than the Planning and Zoning Department, would review applications related to Flagstone,” the judge wrote.
The City Commission declared the project in default for failing to begin construction by an April 30, 2017, deadline for the retail and hotel portions and voted to end the Flagstone lease.
Flagstone sued the city in June 2017, and the city countersued, claiming Flagstone repeatedly missed project deadlines, necessitating multiple changes to the development agreement.
If the city approves the settlement, things will go back to the same place as when the garage design change was in play.
“We do not anticipate any problems, but it is a step that has to be taken,” said Stearns of Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson in Miami.
If the case went to trial, Stearns said Flagstone could claim nearly $200 million in damages.
Plans call for a 535-foot hotel with 305 rooms, 200 of which will be traditional hotel rooms and 105 timeshares, and a 375-foot hotel with 300 rooms. The retail portion would be 221,000 square feet, and the parking garage would be up to three stories high with 1,500 spaces.
Stroock & Stroock & Lavan partner Laura Besvinick, special counsel Julie Nevins and Hans Hertell and associate Christina Himmel, all in Miami, represent the city.
Dorta Law partners Gonzalo Dorta and Matias Dorta of Coral Gables also worked on behalf of the city.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250