When Do You Have an Ethical Duty to Report a Mentally Ill Lawyer?
Miami attorney John Barkett prepared a report on ethical quandaries for an American Bar Association panel discussion.
May 03, 2019 at 01:25 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Your partner has a heart attack and the first thing you do is inform the attorney discipline committee because you're sure he can't be as strong an advocate with a weakened heart. Absurd. Right?
Then when would it be necessary to turn in a colleague who is depressed? What if she is an alcoholic or a drug abuser and can't be counted on to safeguard client information if she blacked out? What if he is suicidal and you worry that reporting him might prompt him to kill himself?
These were the questions an American Bar Association panel grappled with in a discussion titled “Balancing a Lawyer's Cry for Help from Dependency or Depression with Ethical Obligations of Competence and Reporting.” The panel dealt with the thorny issue of when a lawyer crosses from mental illness to impairment and should withdraw from cases.
Joseph Milowic III, a Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan partner who revealed his struggles with depression a year ago, was a member of the panel. He introduced the heart attack analogy to suggest lawyers who are mentally ill should be treated the same as those with physical illnesses.
“I think it's important that we dispel any notion that we have to report any of our colleagues just because he comes to you with a mental health issue,” Milowic said. “That should not be the perception.”
Some of the country's most prominent lawyers at the top of their game struggle with mental illness, said Milowic, founder of the Lawyers Depression Project, a peer-to-peer mental health support group that chats online and by phone twice a week.
“Lawyers with a well-being impairment may be, under certain circumstances, at greater risk of losing one of these devices or leaving them somewhere where they may not be recovered,” attorney John Barkett said in a report he prepared for the discussion.
Barkett, a Miami partner at Shook, Hardy & Bacon and a member of the ABA standing committee on ethics and professional responsibility, said it's clear a lawyer who commits misconduct has to be reported. What's less clear is when a lawyer's impairment in itself is enough to warrant reporting if the lawyer fails to withdraw from assignments. Barkett said he never faced such a situation in his 45 years of practice.
Richard Gaal, co-chair of the Mental Health and Wellness Task Force for the ABA and a partner at McDowell Knight Roedder & Sledge in Mobile, Alabama, recounted how he realized he was an alcoholic at a lawyers convention in New Orleans.
“As a young lawyer, I very much loved the idea of work hard, play hard,” he said. “And New Orleans was one of my favorite places to play.”
But when he blacked out during the trip, he came to the conclusion he had a problem. He felt he was operating at a “pretty high threshold,” but looking back he realizes he could have been a much better lawyer. Gaal, who moderated the panel Thursday, has been sober since 2010.
Gaal said some of his colleagues didn't even realize he was a problem drinker. Perhaps that's no surprise, considering the prevalence of such behavior in the legal profession. In the 2016 study on lawyer well-being, the Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation and the ABA Commission on Lawyer Assistance found more than 22 percent of the nearly 13,000 working lawyers surveyed had problems with alcohol or drug use.
Gaal didn't do anything in his alcoholic haze that endangered clients. But what would have happened, for instance, if Gaal or any other impaired lawyer lost an electronic device with sensitive client information while blacked out?
Diana Uchiyama, executive director of the Illinois Lawyers' Assistance Program in Chicago and a panel member, said she sometimes wonders whether lawyers join the profession with such high rates of mental illness or develop it on the job. Lawyers are often perfectionists and pessimists, two qualities that lead to depression and anxiety, she said.
While she acknowledges everyone makes mistakes, mistakes often are not acceptable in the legal profession.
Barkett described the dilemma this way: “Generally speaking, we're not supposed to be perfect, but we're not supposed to make mistakes.”
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida Hurricane Relief—IRS Offers Extended Deadlines and Tax Benefits
4 minute readAgainst the Odds: Voters Elect Woody Clermont to the Broward Judicial Bench
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250