Role of Personal Injury Litigation in Changing the Trucking Industry
Changes to the trucking industry could be prompted by multimillion trucking crash lawsuits.
May 09, 2019 at 09:54 AM
5 minute read
Truck accidents shatter many lives. Over the course of my career as a personal injury lawyer, I secured substantial jury verdicts and settlements for serious trucking crash lawsuits in Florida. I got $5.5 million for a couple killed in a high-speed accident when their van was rear-ended by a tractor-trailer traveling above highway speed and $1.3 for a propane truck that ran out of control and killed a motorist who was on vacation with his family, just to name a few. As I'm limited by the terms of confidentiality agreements, I cannot discuss the details of the cases, the names of the parties or the insurance companies involved, but some broad lessons can still be learned.
As an injury lawyer for two decades, I don't just try cases. I use my trucking experience of solving truck injury and wrongful death cases to further the cause of safer roads. Cases like the ones mentioned protect the rights of trucking accident victims by recovering financial compensation. They also transmit a powerful message of change and of the need to prevent crashes to the trucking industry and to insurance companies.
Motor carriers need to know that they can be held accountable for the corporate culture of cutting corners on safety rules and taking risks to save money. There are attorneys who will hold them responsible for the violations and they will be penalized. Collisions with commercial vehicles produce such horrific injuries and so many fatalities that trucking companies should do what they can to see that they don't occur anymore.
Investigating catastrophic truck accidents requires having specialized knowledge and working closely with experts to guarantee that any accident-causing shortcuts are discovered. But the trucking companies often are not being held accountable for flagrant violations and the injuries they cause, because far too many personal injury attorneys do not have the necessary expertise.
Many lawyers can competently handle a simple auto accident but not all personal injury lawyers handle truck cases. A plaintiffs attorney's lack of expertise and experience allows unsafe trucking companies to continue cutting safety and maintenance corners by ignoring rules, hiring unfit drivers or putting unsafe trucks on the roads. Too often trucking companies accept no responsibility for their flagrant disregard of the rules.
The goal to make our roads safer and change the trucking industry is ambitious. We need to hold accountable trucking companies that endanger public safety for a bigger bottom line.
While railroads have solidified into a few strong motor carriers with the power to exert influence over each other, thousands of large and small trucking firms compete over prices. As trucking companies do whatever they can to reduce costs, truckers end up working long hours for low pay. Not surprisingly, sleepy truck drivers crashing into cars is a problem that won't go away even after many decades of would-be solutions.
Technology improvements, like electronic log devices, are something I advocate for as they can make us safer. But they may not prevent all truck accidents. In many of my own truck-accident cases for individuals who are injured or even killed, it's the trucking company and even the safety director who are putting pressure on truckers to violate the law.
For example, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration mandates electronic log devices for commercial motor vehicles. Their aim is to better enforce existing hours of service laws for truckers. The electronic log devices replace paper logbooks and monitor location information, engine hours, movement and miles driven.
Truckers should adhere to the required rest breaks and avoid fatigue and this should benefit road safety. But as investigations reveal, truck drivers are still falsifying the numbers by switching over from using electronic log devices to a fake paper logbook. Some truckers tell how they feel they are forced to do so to bypass the fatigue laws, as they are constantly exceeding the maximum service hours.
Another problem is that safety features, warning procedures and devices aren't normal practice for every trucking company. Every safety feature costs money. In this business, when some companies fight hard to survive, having correct safety equipment is the first area that suffers cutbacks.
These companies make a simple calculus, they reason that they can afford to only spend money on gas and salaries. Like most other catastrophic events in life, there's a tendency to think that accidents or lawsuits and their overwhelming costs will never happen. Commercial trucking companies who adopt this attitude gamble with their own lives and fortunes and with the lives of the motorists who share the roads.
Personal injury lawyers go hard after commercial trucking companies because they're supposed to behave like the certified professionals they are. Their screw-ups can do a lot of harm. The essential fact is that many commercial trucking companies who get sued could have done something to keep the accident from happening. Many motor carriers will decry the cost of the lawsuit while ignoring the cost of preventing accidents in the first place.
As a personal injury attorney with experience litigating accidents where tractor trailers or large trucks are involved, my goal is to discover each and every trucking safety violation behind an accident and hold trucking companies fully accountable for every bad choice. Any large truck accident case result hopefully forces the entire commercial truck industry to understand there's a price when they put unsafe trucks on the roads and re-evaluate safety.
Sean Cleary, of the Law Offices of Sean M. Cleary in Miami, handles complex personal injury cases.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLeveraging the Power of Local Chambers of Commerce: A Second-Career Lawyer’s Guide to Building a Thriving Practice
5 minute readCFPB Proposes Rule to Regulate Data Brokers Selling Sensitive Information
5 minute readEssential Labor Shifts: Navigating Noncompetes, Workplace Politics and the AI Revolution
Trending Stories
- 1Relaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
- 2Reviewing Judge Merchan's Unconditional Discharge
- 3With New Civil Jury Selection Rule, Litigants Should Carefully Weigh Waiver Risks
- 4Young Lawyers Become Old(er) Lawyers
- 5Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250