South Florida Lawyers Score $2.1M Verdict For Child Scarred After Bowling Alley Slip
South Florida lawyers John P. Fischer, Ian G. Ward II and Kara Ferrier argued that if Davie bowling alley staff had noticed a water spillage, a 7-year-old patron wouldn't have been left with permanent scarring from knee surgery.
May 10, 2019 at 03:46 PM
7 minute read
A team of South Florida lawyers secured $2.1 million for a 10-year old girl who slipped and fell at Davie bowling alley SpareZ LLC, injuring her knee during a family birthday party.
It wasn't a straightforward slip-and-fall narrative for John P. Fischer and Ian G. Ward II of Fischer Redavid in Hollywood, and Kara Ferrier of the Vaval Ferrier Law Group in Davie. The case was subtle, hinging more on emotional damages than physical injury.
Miami resident London Paris was 7 years old at the time of the accident in 2015 and was following her great-aunt to an arcade room when she slipped in dirty water, landing hard on the floor, according to court pleadings.
The spillage was away from the lanes, in the bowler's circle — where spectators sit with food and drinks. It was also peppered with footprints, according to Paris' great aunt, suggesting it had been there a while.
Two years on, Paris' parents brought the negligence suit against bowling alley company Schumacker Recreation Co. LLC. Fischer, Ward and Ferrier soon discovered that staff hadn't used an inspection checklist that day, though company policy mandated it. And a few depositions later, it emerged no one could say they'd recently checked the area, even though two other customers had slipped there in recent years, the attorneys said.
Defense attorneys Ramon Javier and Richard A. Vargas of Ramon E. Javier & Associates in Miami did not respond to requests for comment before deadline, but argued their client wasn't to blame and had no idea about the spillage, which they claimed the plaintiff would have noticed if she'd been careful.
Though staff claimed no one knew the water was there, Fischer, Ward and Ferrier argued that didn't matter under the theory of constructive notice, which asserts they should have known. The way Fischer saw it, a bowling alley hosting multiple kids' birthday parties on one day should have been more careful, so he pushed the company's corporate representative on that point during cross-examination.
|Click here to read the complaint
“I asked him a simple question,” Fischer said. ” 'Can we agree that water on the floor in an area where there's a little kid's birthday party, where they're running around, that that's dangerous?' And his response was that 'it could be.' ”
Fischer followed up with, “When is it not dangerous?” — a question he later discovered the jury foreperson had memorialized in notes.
It wasn't easy talking damages, according to Fischer, as Paris' medical treatment had been sporadic and, structurally, her knee was OK. Paris went to the emergency room after the accident and again months later, complaining of pain in her knee, but her injury wasn't obvious.
The doctor eventually discovered what looked like a bone density issue in Paris' X-ray and worried it could be a loose bone fragment. After an MRI scan, he was convinced and suggested surgery.
But it didn't go to plan as the pediatric surgeon couldn't find any loose fragments in Paris' knee. According to Fischer, that's because it had either fused back into place or hadn't been there to begin with. The surgery left physical scars on her knee, which Fischer argued will eventually stretch.
“She's not going to stay that size forever, so they're going to get bigger,” Fischer said.
|The invisible scarring
At trial the plaintiffs' team zeroed in on the aftermath of the fall, which Fischer said created “scarring on the inside.” Paris was nervous before going under anesthesia, and her parents agonized over whether to go through with the surgery but decided to trust the surgeon, the way Fischer tells it.
“There was testimony from the dad that [Paris] said, 'I'm going to wake up, right?' ” Fischer said. “ It was a tough decision for the parents.”
Ten-year-old Paris testified at trial, describing her knee pain to the court. She recalled struggling to keep up with classmates while starring in a school play and being confused at the injustice of not being able to do what everyone else could.
“When you take a child at such a young age, at early developmental stage, and you convince them that 'something's wrong with you, you're broken, you're not the same, you're different,' that kind of stuff can cause effects and ramifications for the rest of their life,” Fischer said. “That's what this fall did.”
The defense's medical expert, however, highlighted that was the only incident Paris could recount, despite having said that she often felt pain in her knee. That didn't fly well with jurors, in Fischer's opinion, as it insinuated a credibility problem with a young child.
Aside from being upset about missing a full day of school, Paris did a great job, according to Fischer.
“She talked about whether to tell the truth or not,” Fischer said. “And she said, 'Yes. It's important to tell the truth.' Why? She said, 'Because the truth will set you free.' ”
Paris' mother also testified, becoming emotional when recalling that some employees had allegedly laughed when she first told them about the fall, her attorney said.
The plaintiff waived medical bills to seek between $3 million and $5 million in pain and suffering damages. Jurors found SpareZ was negligent but landed on a lower number, awarding $300,000 for past pain and suffering and $1.8 million for future.
“ Kids are supposed to grow up being kids, not in and out of doctors' offices, not having surgery and being unable to do the things that everyone else did,” Fischer said.
Parents like Paris' are often judged as being greedy by some who assume the case is about money, according to Fischer, so he made it clear to jurors they won't get a penny.
“This is all for the child. It's hard enough being a plaintiff but then subjecting your child to that and being there for them throughout is a lot,” Fischer said. “I commend them for having the strength to do that for her.”
|Read the full jury verdict:
|Case: Kenny Paris and Nikeya Jenkins, parents of L.P., a minor v. Schumacker Recreation Co. LLC, doing business as SpareZ.
Case no.: 2017-CA-003139-09
Description: Premises Liability
Filing date: Feb. 13, 2017
Verdict date: March 20, 2019
Judge: Broward Circuit Judge Jeffrey R. Levenson
Plaintiffs attorneys: John P. Fischer and Ian G. Ward II, Fischer Redavid, Hollywood; Kara Ferrier, the Vaval Ferrier Law Group, Davie
Defense attorneys: Ramon Javier and Richard A. Vargas, Ramon E. Javier & Associates, Miami
Verdict amount: $2.1 million
More verdict stories:
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllArt of the Settlement: Trump Attorney Reveals Strategy in ABC Lawsuit
Nurse Awarded $2.3M in Orlando Crash Case After Declining $50K Settlement Offer
Trump, ABC News Settle Defamation Lawsuit Before Depositions
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250