Watson Island in Line for Hotels, Retail After Miami Settles Developer's Lawsuit
The Miami City Commission agrees to settle Flagstone Island Gardens's lawsuit for $20 million, half of which is rent abatement for the city-owned property poised for development.
May 10, 2019 at 08:53 AM
4 minute read
A yearslong deadlock between Miami and the developer of the city-owned Watson Island ended with an agreement to settle a lawsuit for $20 million.
The City Commission voted Thursday to settle Flagstone Island Gardens LLC's lawsuit, essentially restarting a redevelopment plan for the island along MacArthur Causeway that started 18 years ago.
Flagstone Island Gardens, led by Mehmet Bayraktar, wants to resume its plan for two hotels, retail and a garage on the northwest side of the island. It already has built a 50-slip megayacht marina and restaurant space, where The Deck recently opened.
City Commissioners Joe Carollo and Manolo Reyes said they reluctantly approved the settlement.
If the litigation went on, Flagstone could have claimed nearly $200 million in damages, said the developer's attorney, Eugene Stearns, a shareholder with Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson in Miami.
Under the agreement, the city will pay $5 million up front and $2.5 million in the next fiscal year and the year after. The city also would erase $10 million in rent that otherwise would be due over 10 years.
Reyes said it's misleading to say the settlement value is only $20 million.
“I want, for the record, people to know that there are changes here that could have long-term economic impact. We are extending the construction of a hotel by five or six years, and we are not requiring that hotel to be built in a shorter time,” he said. “That is funds that are not coming in to us in the way of taxes or percentage revenue.”
The stalemate happened after Flagstone accused the city of not signing off on a parking tweak even though city staff members said the change was minor, could be done administratively and made the project better.
The major use special permit change called for the redesign of a seven-story garage to make it less conspicuous by making the structure shorter and spreading parking around the project's footprint.
The city also raised issue with Bayraktar's written statements that he hadn't secured financing but could finance the project himself.
Things heated up in 2017 when the City Commission voted to suspend the development by declaring Flagstone was in default for failing to begin hotel and retail construction by an April 30, 2017, deadline.
Flagstone responded with a lawsuit and won in court last year when Miami-Dade Circuit Judge William Thomas said the company had complied with agreements and started work by deadline.
Thomas also appeared to side with Flagstone on its claim that the true reason the permit was held up was due to political pressure from an opposition group. The Coalition Against Causeway Chaos wrote several letters to the city opposing changes.
“CACC was quite effective. In fact, the City Commission, which is supposed to play an appellate role in the modification process, suspended the normal administrative process, as it relates to Flagstone, and decided that the commission, rather than the Planning and Zoning Department, would review applications related to Flagstone,” the judge wrote.
Plans call for a 535-foot hotel with 305 rooms, including 105 timeshares, and a 375-foot hotel with 300 rooms. The retail portion would be 221,000 square feet, and the parking garage would be up to three stories high with 1,500 spaces.
“We want this project finished,” City Manager Emilio Gonzalez said.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250