Ex-NFL Player's $300M Defamation Suit Against Miami Herald Moved to Southern District of Florida
Former Miami Dolphins cornerback Dimitri Patterson has filed a complaint against the Miami Herald and its owner the McClatchy Company over the newspaper's coverage of Patterson's legal troubles. Prior lawsuits filed against the defendants by Patterson have been dismissed.
May 13, 2019 at 02:40 PM
4 minute read
A former football player with the Miami Dolphins has accused the Miami Herald Media Co. as well as the McClatchy Co. of intentionally inflicting emotional distress as well as printing false information pertaining to his prior run-ins with the law.
Filing as a pro se litigant, Dimitri Patterson entered a complaint against the newspaper and its owner in the Middle District of Florida on May 3. The case, which was transferred to the Southern District of Florida on Wednesday, contends the Miami Herald attempted ”to assassinate” Patterson's character in three articles published about the plaintiff between August 2017 and May 2018.
“The articles are false and defamatory in their overall portrayal of DP as a violent, impulsive, unstable, heartless, cruel person who is abusive to women and children, and fugitive evading felony charges,” the complaint said.
The stories reported Lawson attempted to run from the Lawson E. Thomas Courthouse Center after he was ordered to be placed in custody by Miami-Dade Circuit Judge William Altfield in August 2017. According to an article authored by Miami Herald writer Charles Rabin, the plaintiff injured two police officers in the ensuing scuffle.
A subsequent May 8, 2018, story reported Patterson had been arrested by Orange County law enforcement officers. He was detained under an active felony warrant for battery and culpable negligence issued against him in Miami-Dade County.
The suit repeatedly categorizes assertions made in the articles as false. “DP never injured any police officers while running out of a courtroom at the Lawson E. Thomas Courthouse in downtown Miami, nor did a Judge order for him to be taken into custody,” the complaint states. “There are cameras outside and inside the courtroom, which supports this and there are no official judicial proceedings or documentations that exists of a judge holding DP in contempt of court.”
The complaint adds, “DP was never legally acquitted of battery and culpable negligence by a jury in July, because he was never legally charged with those two crimes. You cannot acquit a person of a crime that they were never charged with pursuant to Florida law.”
Read the lawsuit:
Patterson's legal action seeks a $300 million judgment against the defendants and requests that the offending articles be removed “from www.miamiherald.com and all online search engines worldwide for eternity.”
Rick Hirsch, the Miami Herald's managing editor, stood by the paper's reporting.
“This is a lawsuit without any merit whatsoever,” he said in a statement to the Daily Business Review. “Our stories accurately reflect Mr. Patterson's arrests.”
McClatchy's PR director Jeanne Segal said the company had no comment on the suit.
This is not the first time Patterson has represented himself in a lawsuit against the Miami Herald or other high-profile defendants. In December 2018, U.S. District Judge Roy Dalton Jr. dismissed the plaintiff's suit against the Miami Herald Media Co. without prejudice after Patterson failed to file a timely response. Dalton found the case “is due to be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.” Former Florida Gov. Rick Scott was among the parties also sued by the former Dolphins cornerback for failing “to take care that the laws are faithfully executed” and depriving Patterson of his constitutional rights.
Dalton dismissed the suit against Scott in September 2018 and held the “claims against Governor Scott cannot proceed, nor can [Patterson's] claim for a preliminary injunction because he has no likelihood of success on the merits.”
Patterson did not return requests for comment by press time.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Trending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250