South Florida Judge Orders Attorney Fees to Be Withheld from Litigator in Contract Dispute
Palm Beach Circuit Judge Lisa Small ordered prospective attorney fees from several tobacco cases to be placed in a trust with the Levine Kellogg Lehman Schneider & Grossman law firm, instead of awarded to attorney Phillip Tim Howard.
May 14, 2019 at 03:14 PM
4 minute read
A Tallahassee litigator feuding with an investor over a planned hotel refurbishment has been handed a setback in a Palm Beach County courtroom.
Palm Beach Circuit Judge Lisa Small granted a motion to withhold prospective attorney fees in a dozen tobacco cases involving attorney Phillip Tim Howard.
The motion to preclude Howard from accessing the fees was filed by litigators Steven Katzman and Charles Bennardini, partners with South Florida law firm Katzman, Wasserman Bennardini & Rubinstein, on behalf of their client BWCI Pension Trustees Ltd.
“The Florida Bar Trust Accounting Rule … requires that when in the course of representation a lawyer is in possession of property in which two or more persons, one of whom may be a lawyer, claim an interest, the property must be treated by the lawyer as trust property and the portion in dispute shall be kept separate by the lawyer until the dispute is resolved,” the order held.
Small ordered Howard to transfer any attorney fees received in the cases listed in the motion to a trust account at a Miami firm.
“In the future, any attorneys' fees originating from these matters and paid to Howard and/or Howard & Associates shall be transferred to the separate trust account of Levine Kellogg within five business days of receipt and held in that same trust account until further order of the court,” Small wrote. “No monies are to be disbursed from that trust account without further order of this court.”
Bennardini told the Daily Business Review BWCI filed suit against Howard in April 2018 for purportedly failing to pay back an equity investment of $640,000 and a $1 million bonus that had been agreed upon in January 2018.
Read the order:
“Howard, through some of his entities, was going to buy a half-completed Jacksonville condominium and hotel project,” Bennardini said. The building, located in downtown Jacksonville along Bay Street, required $26 million to purchase. Although Howard was able to obtain a loan to take ownership of the property, he needed a $640,000 insurance policy to secure the loan outright.
The parties worked out an agreement for Howard to deliver $1.64 million to BWCI on Jan. 19. When he failed to do so, the plaintiff entered a complaint against the attorney for breach of equity and guaranty agreements.
Bennardini said as long as Howard owes his clients money, they have a vested interested in any attorney fees he might earn.
“Those fees have to be paid in a separate trust account until the court resolves that dispute,” he said, noting the cases listed in their motion are ones “in which Howard has an expectation to receive attorney's fees.” Bennardini added the defendant “put up his interest” in the fees.
A motion filed on Howard's behalf by Levine Kellogg Lehman Schneider & Grossman attorney Stephanie Traband argued the plaintiff's request ought to be rejected, as they “continue to have the adequate remedy sought by its complaint, namely a money judgment against various parties.”
Traband did not respond to requests for comment by press time. Her co-counsel, Tampa-McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter attorney James Myers, referred the Daily Business Review to his colleague John Leonard for inquiries regarding the case. Leonard did not respond to email and phone inquiries by deadline, and neither did Howard.
Bennardini said Small did the right thing through her order, citing the investigation Howard is currently facing from the Florida Bar for purportedly misappropriating trust account funds.
“The court required that these monies be placed in the trust account at Levine Kellogg and not at Howard & Associates after I mentioned to the court about the present bar complaint [against Howard],” he said. “I wanted to make sure the court knew that before she left a fox guarding the hen house.”
The defendant is also locked in litigation with Miami attorney J.B. Harris over Howard's purported failure to finance tobacco cases the pair had intended to litigate together.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Families Settle Court Battle Over Who Owns Parkland Killer's Name, Likeness
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Davis Polk Lands Spirit Chapter 11 Amid Bankruptcy Resurgence
- 2Construction Fall Nets $2.3 Million Settlement After Trial Begins
- 3By the Numbers: The 2024 LTN Law Firm Tech Survey
- 4Can The Threat of a Bar Complaint Be a Settlement Tool?
- 5Sentencing Commission Addresses Inconsistent Definitions of “Loss”
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250