Citi: Expansions Helped Boost Demand Growth at Southeast Firms
Firms in the southeast, including Florida and Georgia, saw much of their growth driven by expansion.
May 14, 2019 at 03:45 PM
2 minute read
Law firms in the southeastern United States, including Florida and Georgia, saw higher revenue and demand growth — a trend that runs counter to what law firms have experienced across the U.S. as a whole, according to a Q1 survey by Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group.
“Q1 was a strong start for southeast firms,” said Citi Private Bank Director David Altuna.
The survey results are based on a sample of 187 firms (75 Am Law 100 firms, 52 Second Hundred firms and 60 niche/boutique firms). The Southeast firms in the survey include 19 firms stretching down the east coast from Virginia (excluding Washington, D.C.) to Florida.
Revenue of southeastern firms grew 5.6%, compared with the national average of 4.5%. Expenses increased 6.4% — on par with the U.S. average of 6.5%.
But the primary drivers of revenue growth and expenses differed from those nationwide.
Nationally, higher costs were driven by associate pay raises. For the southeast, expenses were pushed up by head count growth, which increased by 4%. The national average was just under 2%.
In addition, southeast firms saw demand grow by 1.8% — a departure from firms across the U.S., which saw a decrease in demand of 0.3%. This is notable, said Altuna, because demand growth was a major factor in the success of 2018.
“It's really telling because last year was a strong year from a demand perspective,” he said.
Altuna added that there is a relationship between head count and demand. Firms look to capture growth in demand by expanding into new markets. The expansion means hiring additional lawyers, driving up head count. Southeast firms had higher rates than the national average in both metrics. The question is whether the new expenses will eat up the revenue gains.
Additionally, the report found that regional firms were hurt most by this expansion push. Statewide firms saw the largest decline in demand growth (1.6%) and were among the firms that experienced the most sluggish revenue growth (2%).
Similar Stories:
Citi Survey: Increased Salaries Weren't Enough to Derail Strong Revenues at Southeast Law Firms
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTurning the Shock of a January Marital Split Into Effective Strategies for Your Well-Being
5 minute readLatest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
3 minute readSouth Florida Real Estate Lawyers See More Deals Flow, But Concerns Linger
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250