Citi: Expansions Helped Boost Demand Growth at Southeast Firms
Firms in the southeast, including Florida and Georgia, saw much of their growth driven by expansion.
May 14, 2019 at 03:45 PM
2 minute read
Law firms in the southeastern United States, including Florida and Georgia, saw higher revenue and demand growth — a trend that runs counter to what law firms have experienced across the U.S. as a whole, according to a Q1 survey by Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group.
“Q1 was a strong start for southeast firms,” said Citi Private Bank Director David Altuna.
The survey results are based on a sample of 187 firms (75 Am Law 100 firms, 52 Second Hundred firms and 60 niche/boutique firms). The Southeast firms in the survey include 19 firms stretching down the east coast from Virginia (excluding Washington, D.C.) to Florida.
Revenue of southeastern firms grew 5.6%, compared with the national average of 4.5%. Expenses increased 6.4% — on par with the U.S. average of 6.5%.
But the primary drivers of revenue growth and expenses differed from those nationwide.
Nationally, higher costs were driven by associate pay raises. For the southeast, expenses were pushed up by head count growth, which increased by 4%. The national average was just under 2%.
In addition, southeast firms saw demand grow by 1.8% — a departure from firms across the U.S., which saw a decrease in demand of 0.3%. This is notable, said Altuna, because demand growth was a major factor in the success of 2018.
“It's really telling because last year was a strong year from a demand perspective,” he said.
Altuna added that there is a relationship between head count and demand. Firms look to capture growth in demand by expanding into new markets. The expansion means hiring additional lawyers, driving up head count. Southeast firms had higher rates than the national average in both metrics. The question is whether the new expenses will eat up the revenue gains.
Additionally, the report found that regional firms were hurt most by this expansion push. Statewide firms saw the largest decline in demand growth (1.6%) and were among the firms that experienced the most sluggish revenue growth (2%).
|Similar Stories:
Citi Survey: Increased Salaries Weren't Enough to Derail Strong Revenues at Southeast Law Firms
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAnticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
6 minute readZero-Dollar Verdict: Which of Florida's Largest Firms Lost?
Florida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Productivity Suite Startup Macro Announces $12 Million Funding Round
- 2Rudy Giuliani Loses Bid to Dismiss $1.3 Million Davidoff Hutcher & Citron Suit Over Unpaid Legal Fees
- 3Discovery Dispute: Investigated Judge Boxed Out by Work Product Doctrine
- 4Florida Supreme Court Paves Way for Attorney Fees Over $100k in Land Dispute
- 5How My Postpartum Depression Led to Launching My Firm’s Parental Leave Coaching Program
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250