Owner Keeps Historic Brickell House Turned Office After Fighting Buyback
Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Abby Cynamon sides with the current owner of a historic mansion and rejects a buyback attempt.
May 14, 2019 at 04:50 PM
5 minute read
The owner of a historic house repurposed as offices in Miami's Brickell district will keep the property after fighting off a buyback pursued by the previous owner.
The current and the former owners fought in court for four years over the 9,172-square-foot, two-story house at 1548 Brickell Ave. Its Neo-Classical architecture and a portico supported by four colossal Corinthian columns make it more reminiscent of a Southern mansion than part of the busy Financial District.
Banker George Nolan built the home in 1925, fulfilling his wife's wish for ”a big Southern colonial home.” The couple hosted gatherings on what then was known as Millionaire's Row, according to the Miami historic preservation program website. Nolan's family lived there until the 1990s.
Lupetto Inc. sold the house for $5.1 million in 2008 to South Bay Developers Group LLC, led by Ernesto Weisson, through 1548 Brickell Ave LLC.
The two at the time agreed to a give-and-take in which Lupetto reduced the original $6.2 million sale price by $1.1 million in exchange for being given the option to buy back the property by a deadline for $5.1 million.
The price could be reduced by subtracting debts and liabilities on the property, and it was this price reduction that played at least a small part in Lupetto's lawsuit.
Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Abby Cynamon on Friday sided with South Bay owner 1548 Brickell, saying Lupetto missed the 2015 buyback deadline.
Lupetto wrote South Bay in 2014, saying it planned to exercise the repurchase option, but it didn't follow up as required with a purchase agreement within 30 days, Cynamon concluded. Under the agreement, Lupetto was to put $100,000 in escrow, but that didn't happen either.
Lupetto attorney Jon Polenberg said the company is evaluating its options following Cynamon's order.
“We respect Judge Cynamon and the work she did. We respect our opposing counsel and the work they did on the case. We disagree with the result, and the plaintiff is considering what options to do from here,” the Becker shareholder said.
The legal dispute focused on the order and buyback deadlines.
Lupetto sued in 2015 and amended the complaint most recently in 2017, arguing South Bay and 1548 Brickell didn't provide the financial documents needed by Lupetto to move forward with the buyback. Lupetto said it needed documents showing debts and liabilities to arrive at a final price.
In a three-day bench trial ending Jan. 25, Lupetto argued South Bay and 1548 had refused to adjust the $5.1 million price by taking account of the debts and liabilities on the property.
In a post-trial memo filed on Feb. 5, Lupetto noted experts on opposing sides calculated different buyback prices. If Lupetto were to close on the buyback by the end of 2018, the purchase price would have been reduced to just over $3.3 million, Polenberg wrote.
But Glen Waldman, the attorney for South Bay and 1548, said Lupetto was putting “the cart before the horse.” It was supposed to turn over a purchase agreement and meet other obligations before getting the financial documents.
“The agreement said that they don't get the due diligence materials until five days after the purchase agreement is signed,” said Waldman, co-managing partner at Waldman Barnett in Miami.
Cynamon agreed, saying Lupetto had 30 days to turn in an agreement and put $100,000 in an escrow. The financial records were to be provided to Lupetto five days after the repurchase agreement was signed, Cynamon's order said.
There was no requirement to settle on a buyback price before signing the repurchase agreement, Cynamon said. Lupetto also could opt out of the buyback and get its escrow money back.
South Bay and 1548 responded on the 2015 buyback deadline.
“We turned around and countersued them and said, 'You are out of luck, guys. You waited too long. You haven't done all the things you were supposed to do under the agreement and your rights have ended,' ” Waldman said.
The dispute illustrates how valuable Miami property can become contentious in a booming real estate market.
South Bay invested about $2 million in improvements as it converted the house into offices, Waldman said.
“ This property is now worth double, close to double, what the repurchase amount was,” he said. “The spread is probably $4 million between what they were going to repurchase it for and what it would probably command on the open market today, so we are talking about a lot of money.”
Office space provider The Hive at Brickell, which lists the building, offers private and semi-private offices, lounges, event space and meeting areas.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1Troutman Pepper, Claiming Ex-Associate's Firing Was Performance Related, Seeks Summary Judgment in Discrimination Suit
- 2Law Firm Fails to Get Punitive Damages From Ex-Client
- 3Over 700 Residents Near 2023 Derailment Sue Norfolk for More Damages
- 4Decision of the Day: Judge Sanctions Attorney for 'Frivolously' Claiming All Nine Personal Injury Categories in Motor Vehicle Case
- 5Second Judge Blocks Trump Federal Funding Freeze
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250