Opportunity Zones Seen as Bonus Rather Than Driving Force on Deals
Real estate brokers and attorneys with clients assessing what's on the market see added value in OZ designations.
May 16, 2019 at 02:14 PM
7 minute read
Options
Yet, that doesn't hold true across the board. While the $3.4 million asking price for the industrial building near Hialeah wasn't significantly increased because the property is in an OZ, the $20.2 million asking price for the Pompano Beach site went up, said Genet, who is marketing both. The OZ benefit plays some role in driving interest. "It's been half and half. Some people want to pursue it and some people, it's just not part of their business plan," Genet said, referring to the buyer pool for the Pompano Beach site. Exactly how a developer structures OZ investments varies from deal to deal. Some buy properties betting OZ investors will come in, and others plan to invest their capital gains in their own development. Others aren't pursuing real estate projects but are moving their companies to OZs as a way to get tax beaks. The industrial building at 3580 NW 52nd St. would lend itself well to such business relocation, Genet said. "You could take taxable income and move your business into an opportunity zone and cash in on the benefit that way. You don't necessarily have to demolish the real estate and rebuild. You could just move your company within one, and this property is something that could potentially work for a group like that," he said. Businesses must follow the regulations to get tax breaks, including at least half of their staff working at the OZ site as well as half of the payroll and revenue generated from there. The Pompano Beach property at 1001 and 1021 NW 12th Terrace is likely to be redeveloped, Genet said. The three lots have three tenants occupying most of the property, but 5.5 acres is vacant. "You could develop the 5.5 acres by paving it and building a building on it, and you could also do that on the northern parcel. The lease is rolling there, so you could also develop that piece as well. So you'd have roughly 11 acres to develop in the near term," Genet said. A buyer also could wait for leases to run out and redevelop the entire site. "We've had multiple offers and more than 100 confidentiality agreements," Genet said.
Building Higher
Even without the OZ tax benefit, the sites on the market offer a lot of potential. Developers can build bigger, taller and denser that what's there now. The Omni acreage, from Biscayne Boulevard west to Northeast Second Avenue and from Northeast 17th Street to 17th Terrace, are home to a Burger King, an office and a retail building, none of which go over two stories. A mixed-use project with residences and a hotel could rise up to 60 stories. The approved plan allows up to 1.6 million square feet, excluding garages, in three towers of 40 to 55 stories, according to Avison Young, which is marketing the property. Alternatively, a developer could build a nearly 4 million-square-foot project including garages and reach 60 stories. These maximums can be achieved only by working the city to provide public benefits like open space or infrastructure improvements in exchange for a bigger project, Avison Young said. The site allows up to 500 residential units, condos or apartments or 1,000 hotel rooms per acre. This means a developer could build 1,500 residential units, 1,000 residential units on two acres and a 1,000-room hotel on the third acre, or mix and match in other ways. The Aventura site at 21291 NE 28th Ave. has city approval for a 142,114-square-foot building with a five-story garage and six-story office building. If a developer opted out of the approved plans, an assisted living facility or hotel are other options, said Peter Messina, a CBRE first vice president who is marketing the property. He echoed Rosen in saying the OZ location is a bonus for the buyer. "We think that that enhances the opportunity in that you have just one more asset to this project that should make it attractive to potential buyers. So now there's an opportunity to save money that normally would be paid in taxes and could yield a higher profit for the developer," said Messina, based in Fort Lauderdale. There is no asking price for the Aventura and Omni properties.
OZs
The amount of a tax break a developer gets depends on how long he keeps his capital gains invested. A five-year investment means 10% of the capital gains won't be taxed, and a seven-year investment means 15% of the capital gains won't be taxed. A 10-year investment means the capital gains from the OZ project itself won't be taxed. Rosen said the OZ vehicle might be something that helps clients offset rising construction costs, including more expensive concrete and steel. He mainly represents opportunistic investors, or those who see potential in untapped areas. Still, he reiterated the OZ is something developers consider after other aspects of a deal have been weighed. "They don't pigeonhole themselves saying, 'We need to be in an opportunity zone.' That could pigeonhole them," Rosen said. Related stories: Opportunity Zone Regulations Unveiled With Strong Investment Appetite in South Florida Coral Gables Hotelier Bets Big on Opportunity Zones With Projects and Funds Opportunity Zone Gentrification: Federal Government Signals It Wants to Track the Results South Florida Opportunity Zone Investments Strong Even Before Latest Guidelines
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1Bar Groups Say IOLA Settlement Protects Civil Litigants' Fund From Future 'Raids'
- 2'Every MAGA Will Buy It:' Elon Musk Featured in Miami Crypto Lawsuit
- 3Pennsylvania Law Schools Are Seeing Double-Digit Boosts in 2025 Applications
- 4Meta’s New Content Guidelines May Result in Increased Defamation Lawsuits Among Users
- 5State Court Rejects Uber's Attempt to Move IP Suit to Latin America
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250