No Clear Path to Litigation Amid Reports of Detained Migrants Heading to South Florida
Broward Mayor Mark Bogen announced the federal government intends to begin transporting hundreds of undocumented immigrants to Broward and Palm Beach counties.
May 17, 2019 at 03:58 PM
5 minute read
As alarms are sounded over the Trump administration's unspecified plan to bring migrants to South Florida, experts say there's no straightforward legal strategy outlining a method to combat the policy.
Broward Mayor Mark Bogen announced in a press release Thursday that the federal government intends to begin transporting undocumented immigrants to South Florida, with no prior arrangements for their shelter or safety.
The mayor, who called the plan “irresponsible,” said the county “will do everything possible to help.”
“This is a humanitarian crisis,” Bogen said. “To bring hundreds of people here every week without providing the necessary resources to house and feed them is inhumane.”
Broward Sheriff Gregory Tony said Thursday that he and Palm Beach County Sheriff Ric Bradshaw had been made aware of the plan earlier in the week.
“Although no state or federal government official confirmed such action would be taking place, I elected to share this information with Mayor Mark Bogen and requested an emergency meeting be arranged with all County Commissioners in preparation for such an event,” he said.
U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio and South Florida officials later confirmed the plan's current iteration calls for approximately 1,000 immigrants to be transported and evenly dispersed between Palm Beach and Broward counties on a monthly basis.
University of Miami School of Law professor of law emeritus David Abraham said the lack of details about the policy and the federal government's authority on handling immigration matters made it difficult to outline a tenable legal challenge against the plan.
“In the normal course of events, once people are bonded out … they are free to go whatever distance the court allows them to go,” he said. “So if they're being offered transportation to South Florida … I don't see anything in the law that would prohibit that. It's pretty grim.”
He added, “Immigration policy is a federal government monopoly and the federal government has the authority to use facilities to house immigrants, to house detainees and enhance the authority to lease space if it doesn't have enough space of its own. Normally, this authority is exercised on an individual basis by immigration judges.”
Abraham said although the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's 287(g) program enables the agency to collaborate with local officials in enforcing immigration laws, there's no provision requiring state or local authorities to agree to the release of people waiting for hearings.
“And that's where we are now with this,” he said, noting the policy would make it “much more difficult” for immigration lawyers to obtain documents and witnesses for their clients.
Business immigration attorney and former U.S. consulate to Mexico Jose Latour said the plan resembled the Mexican government's own immigration procedures.
“The Mexican government has been busing people to border towns … and there's a lot of coverage of mayors in these towns saying, 'We can't afford this,' ” he said, noting it's largely fallen on local groups such as churches to provide infrastructure and support to migrants.
Latour said a claim could be made by cities that the plan constitutes a failure by the federal government to manage immigration matters.
“ Historically, whenever the federal government is ignoring or being passive about an issue that affects a local or a state or city government, the lawsuits happen,” he said, adding it's plausible that injunctions or claims for compensation could be pursued. “This is literally transporting the responsibility of those illegal aliens in the U.S. to a different part of the U.S., and having no federal responsibility for the economics behind it.”
Meanwhile, Broward's mayor told the Daily Business Review it appears “the administration has the right to move people from one location to another” on Friday.
“We have our county legal staff looking into it,” Bogen said. “At face value, we don't see where the violations are.”
Romy Lerner, the associate director with University of Miami School of Law's Immigration Clinic, said it's important to prioritize the humanity of people who might be brought to South Florida over how theoretical litigation might play out.
“This is another ploy by the Trump administration to fabricate an immigration crisis and create panic by using or threatening to use human beings as pawns,” she said. “The reality is that the vast majority of these undocumented immigrants would do what they have always done when released from detention and/or at the border: find their way to family and community contacts in Florida.”
Related stories:
'Two Skins': Hard Lessons For Law Students at Immigration Detention Center
UM Law Professor Sues ICE on Behalf of Immigrant Activist Featured in Documentary
DeSantis Caught Off Guard by Trump Administration Migrant Plan
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
6 minute readRFK Jr. Will Keep Affiliations With Morgan & Morgan, Other Law Firms If Confirmed to DHHS
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1FTX One Year Later: The Impact on Examiner Practice in Bankruptcy Courts
- 2Gen AI Legal Contract Startup Ivo Announces $16 Million Series A Funding Round
- 3DOJ's Flawed Thinking in Challenging HPE-Juniper Merger
- 4Annual Self-Check: Testing For Bias On The Bench
- 5'None of Us Like It': How Expedited Summer Associate Recruiting Affects Law Students and the Firms Hiring Them
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250