State Appeals Court Rejects Arguments on Clerk Funding
Broward County Clerk of Court Brenda Forman claimed the state, through a system of redistributing court-filing fees, had unconstitutionally shortchanged her office.
May 17, 2019 at 12:02 PM
3 minute read
Broward County Clerk of Court Brenda Forman. Photo: J. Albert Diaz.
In a case involving issues that a circuit judge likened to “trying to untangle a plate of spaghetti,” an appeals court overturned a ruling that said the state had “unconstitutionally underfunded” the Broward County clerk of court's office.
A three-judge panel of the First District Court of Appeal sided with the Florida Department of Revenue and the Florida Department of Financial Services, which appealed a ruling last year by Leon County Circuit Judge Karen Gievers.
Gievers, in the 33-page ruling, agreed with Broward County Clerk of Court Brenda Forman that the state, through a system of redistributing court-filing fees, had unconstitutionally shortchanged the Broward clerk's office. Gievers, in part, pointed to the office not meeting performance measures, but the appeals court concluded that didn't mean the office was underfunded in violation of the state constitution.
“The trial court found the filing fee statutes were unconstitutional as applied because they rendered the clerk's office unconstitutionally underfunded, agreeing that even one instance of failing to meet a performance measure was indicative of unconstitutional operations,” said the decision by Judges James Wolf, Timothy Osterhaus and Harvey Jay. “However, we find the clerk failed to prove her office was unconstitutionally underfunded because she failed to put forth any evidence that the alleged lack of funding impacted her ability to meet her constitutional duties or impacted litigants' constitutional rights.”
The appeals court said the case focused on portions of filing fees that clerks are required to send to the state, with the Legislature then diverting part of the money to other purposes. The ruling said Forman argued that the “diversion of fees resulted in her office being so underfunded that it was unable to perform its constitutional duties.”
Gievers, in her April 2018 ruling, went into extensive detail about the history and constitutional issues involved in funding court clerks. She wrote that trying to understand the process of clerks sending filing fees to the state, “only to have certain amounts returned for their court-related operations, while others are deposited into various [state] trust funds is like trying to untangle a plate of spaghetti.”
In ruling for Forman, the judge said the state should not divert filing fees from the Broward County clerk's office “until a constitutionally proper appropriations process has been provided.” But the appeals court Thursday disagreed.
“At most, the clerk proved her office was operationally underfunded,” the appeals court said. “However, she failed to present any evidence that she was unconstitutionally underfunded. Performance standards are not constitutional requirements.”
Jim Saunders reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/28/90/106b497d4c2abf86218e4414ada2/attorney-fees-767x633.jpg)
Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute read![As Unpredictability Rises, Gov't Law Practices Expect Trump Bump. Especially in Florida As Unpredictability Rises, Gov't Law Practices Expect Trump Bump. Especially in Florida](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/3a/bd/04f8d6ca45a49bc6f4b27abc8f32/trump-2025-767x633.jpg)
As Unpredictability Rises, Gov't Law Practices Expect Trump Bump. Especially in Florida
5 minute read![New Trouble for Allstate: National Class Action Targets Insurer New Trouble for Allstate: National Class Action Targets Insurer](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/98/ca/4dd6a947421bbc9c53aad7b8dd51/allstate-insurance-2-767x633.jpg)
![Brownstein Hyatt Opens 13th Office in Tampa With Lobbying Focus Brownstein Hyatt Opens 13th Office in Tampa With Lobbying Focus](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/4e/16/10ba62784f9f8905e4ab91a1fdd9/blake-benenson-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
- 1Parties’ Reservation of Rights Defeats Attempt to Enforce Settlement in Principle
- 2ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards
- 3States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 4Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 5Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250