London Firm Buys Palm Beach Hotel Project as Glenn Straub Keeps Up Appeals
Straub's KK-PB Financial LLC appealed the sale in federal court even as London + Regional Properties was closing on the purchase.
May 20, 2019 at 03:43 PM
5 minute read
An unfinished hotel-condominium in Palm Beach at the center of an alleged massive EB-5 visa fraud has been sold to a London hotel company.
An affiliate of London + Regional Properties bought the Palm House Hotel for $39.6 million on May 14, Palm Beach County property records show. The sale went through even though Wellington developer Glenn Straub is waging a legal battle to a share of the sale price.
The Palm House was envisioned as a 79-unit hotel condominium financed by foreigners who invested in the EB-5 program, which grants green cards in exchange for $500,000 placed in a U.S. commercial venture that creates at least 10 jobs.
Instead, a developer and associates allegedly schemed to siphon some of the funds for personal use, while the salmon-colored property remained unfinished on one of the affluent enclave's few retail strips at 160 Royal Palm Way.
In April, the previous Palm House developer, Robert Matthews, pleaded guilty to charges connected to the EB-5 fraud scheme and faces up to 45 years in prison. His wife, actress Maria “Mia” Matthews, pleaded guilty to tax evasion and faces up to five years imprisonment. A Connecticut grand jury had charged the two last August in a superseding indictment.
Former owner 160 Royal Palm LLC had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection last August. The company, which was led by court-appointed manager Cary Glickstein, initially planned an auction but switched to a private sale to LR U.S. Hotels Holdings LLC, London + Regional's affiliate. U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Erik Kimball approved the deal.
Straub, through his KK-PB Financial LLC, has been fighting 160 Royal Palm at nearly every step, first asking to credit bid and then appealing.
KK-PB Financial has claimed a $39 million secured interest in the Palm House based on a $27.5 million mortgage it issued for the property six years ago. Kimball rejected the claim and KK-PB's credit bid plan.
Kimball on March 14 denied KK-PB's emergency motion to stay his previous orders, including the approval of the sale to London + Regional.
If the stay were granted, London + Regional might withdraw its offer, potentially costing the property and investors “the benefit of the highly beneficial contract approved in the sale order.”
U.S. District Judge Robin Rosenberg on April 10 affirmed all of Kimball's orders appealed by KK-PB, which took its case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
In past filings disputing Kimball's order in favor of the London + Regional sale, KK-PB argued 160 Royal Palm and London + Regional rushed to close the deal, cutting out KK-PB as a potential bidder.
“This expedited 10-day private sale process by the debtor has been about one thing — racing to consummate the private sale between the debtor and LR to prevent KK-PB Financial's principal, Mr. Glenn Straub, from purchasing the hotel,” wrote KK-PB attorney Jim Robinson, a White & Case partner in Miami. He didn't return a request for comment by deadline.
KK-PB Financial accused 160 Royal Palm of engaging in a “charade of good faith negotiation” and rejecting KK-PB's latest offer because of “professed personal animosity toward Mr. Straub.”
London + Regional shelled out $40.6 million for the property, according to its asset purchase agreement with 160 Royal Palm: $39.6 million for the property, $450,000 for brokerage commissions, a $350,000 break-up fee to stalking-horse bidder Related Cos. and a $250,000 settlement payment to the town of Palm Beach.
Related Cos. was approved as the stalking-horse bidder when the property was heading to auction.
In court papers, some of the EB-5 investors said they are owed $22.5 million and others were owed an additional $27.8 million.
“The town will get a legitimate hotel operator and developer into ownership of this high profile property with the will and wherewithal to complete the Palm House Hotel and likely make it a gem, even if not the tiara that its previous developers falsely promised it would be,” the investors wrote in their filing.
London + Regional's attorney, Akerman partner Eyal Berger in Fort Lauderdale, declined to say what the hotel company will do with the property or a redevelopment timeline.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1First California Zantac Jury Ends in Mistrial
- 2Democrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal with GOP
- 3Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 4Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 5Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250