How Did Florida's Am Law 200 Firms Stack Up?
Experts consistently tout Florida as a growing legal market. Three of the firms in the Am Law second hundred moved up in the rankings.
May 22, 2019 at 01:37 PM
4 minute read
Experts consistently tout Florida as one of the fastest growing legal markets in the country — spurred by a growing economy and (comparatively) bargain rates that continue to beckon global firms and stimulate growth in Florida-native law firms.
Florida firms in the lower half of the AmLaw200 saw an average 6.2% increase in gross revenue and 6.3% increase in profits per equity partner — nearly double the national average in revenue growth (3.1%) and more than twice the average in profits per partner (2.8%).
In terms of sheer revenue, though, none of the firms cracked the top 50.
Three of the firms — Carlton Fields, Shutts & Bowen and Greenspoon Marder — jumped multiple spots up the Am Law 200 list. GrayRobinson dropped, though the Orlando-based firm saw a significant increase in profits.
Carlton Fields led the pack in profit per partner, with a year-on-year growth of 15.5% — the 11th highest increase among all Am Law 200 firms. The firm jumped two spots in the rankings, from No. 156 to No. 154.
Carlton Fields CEO and president Gary Sasso attributed the rapid profit growth to a mix of strong attorney and staff hires and taking deliberate steps to value quality over growth.
“We're not trying to be a mega-firm,” Sasso said in a March interview, adding that the firm has turned down multiple merger and acquisition offers in recent years. “Firms over 500 attorneys have problems with scale and conflicts of interest, and I think our strategy has been paying off.”
Greenspoon, meanwhile, is in full growth mode, increasing its revenue by 13%, from $134.7 million to $152.2 million. The firm also grew its head count by double digits—14 percent—bringing the total lawyer head count from 203 to 232. It jumped five spots to 167th, the greatest leap among the Florida Am Law 200.
The firm opened a California office with six attorneys in April of last year, doubling its head count by the end of 2018. The New York office adding 11 more attorneys, and Miami's head count grew by four.
The rapid growth came at a cost to the firm's profitability though, as the firm posted a 13% drop in revenue per lawyer.
Shutts & Bowen, the second largest firm by revenue out of the four, landed somewhere in the middle. The firm saw double-digit growth in both revenue and profits — 10.6% and 10.5% respectively. In fact, Shutts has climbed the AmLaw200 ladder for five consecutive years, from No. 174 in 2014 to No. 162 in 2018.
GrayRobinson is the only outlier in this group, dropping six spots from No. 161 to No. 167. The firm posted a slight dip of 0.8% in revenue growth as its head count contracted from 297 to 276.
But according to GrayRobinson president Mayanne Downs, the declines were intentional. In a March interview, Downs pointed to the firm's 7.2% growth in profits per equity partner — more than double the national average of 3.5% — as evidence of the firm's strategy of leanness.
“Our head count has gone down from 297 to 276, yet our revenue has been reduced very little,” she said. “When you can grow your profits per partner, when you can streamline your organization while preserving revenue growth, it feels good for everybody. … We've never sought to be the largest law firm.”
|Similar Stories
A Year in Review: How Did Florida's Am Law 200 Firms Fare in 2018?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readMorgan & Morgan Looks to Grow Into Complex Litigation While Still Keeping its Billboards Up
6 minute readLost in the Legal Maze: How State Regulations Are Hindering Hemp Operators' Success
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 2GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 3'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 4Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
- 5Chief Assistant District Attorney and Litigator Shortlisted for Paulding County Judgeship
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250