SEC Targets South Florida Residents in Alleged $30M Diamond-Backed Ponzi Scheme
Miami resident Jose Aman as well as South Floridians Jonathan Seigel and Harold Seigel have been accused by the federal agency of defrauding more than 300 investors across North America.
May 22, 2019 at 03:11 PM
5 minute read
A complaint filed in the Southern District of Florida by the Securities Exchange Commission has accused three South Florida men of perpetrating a $30 million Ponzi scheme said to have claimed more than 300 investors as victims.
According to court documents unsealed on Monday, the federal agency is alleging Miami resident Angel Aman and co-defendants Jonathan Seigel and Harold Seigel unlawfully misled lenders regarding investments into their purported diamond vendors Natural Diamonds Investment Co. and Eagle Financial Diamond Group Inc. The SEC is alleging the trio similarly deceived investors into contributing funds into a cryptocurrency venture, Argyle Coin.
The complaint said from May 2014 through December 2018, the defendants “engaged in the unregistered offering of securities in the form of investment contracts in Natural Diamonds,” and later Eagle.
“They told prospective investors that Natural Diamonds would use investor funds to acquire raw colored diamonds known as “fancy colored diamonds,” which they would then cut, polish, and resell for profits that would result in investment returns of 24% and the full return of investors' principal within two years,” the complaint said. “ln reality, Natural Diamonds was a Ponzi scheme. Aman and Natural Diamonds used investor funds to pay prior investors their purported returns.”
The SEC's suit contends the “fancy colored diamonds” used by the defendants to attract investors to Natural Diamonds and Eagle were also used as a selling point for Argyle Coin. The enterprise allegedly touted itself as “offering the first investment in cryptocurrency backed by fancy colored diamonds.”
“They tell investors they will use investor funds to develop Argyle Coin's cryptocurrency business, and the investment is risk-free because investors' principal is protected by valuable diamonds,” the complaint said. “This is false. ln truth, Aman has been using Argyle Coin investor funds to continue the Ponzi scheme by using Argyle Coin investor funds to pay Natural Diamonds and Eagle investors their purported investment returns. As for the valuable diamonds that purportedly protect investors' money, Argyle Coin has none.”
Read the complaint:
The lawsuit asserted Natural Diamonds, Eagle and Argyle Coin collectively brought in more than $30 million from investors, and as of March 31, had “a combined negative balance of about $120,000.” A press release shared by the SEC on Tuesday said Aman used his allegedly ill-gotten gains for personal expenses, including horseback riding lessons for his adult son.
“As alleged, Aman operated a complicated web of fraudulent companies in an effort to continually loot retail investors and perpetuate the Ponzi schemes as well as divert money to himself,”Eric Bustillo, director of the SEC's Miami regional office, said in the release. “The SEC's diligent investigative work uncovered the Ponzi schemes and our goal is to bring justice to the harmed investors.”
The Coral Springs attorney representing the Siegels, solo practitioner Ellen Kaplan, told the Daily Business Review, “I have every confidence that my clients will be vindicated.”
“[The Seigels] vehemently deny the allegations lodged against them and refute any contention they participated in a Ponzi scheme or otherwise misled their friends, family and long standing clients in any way,” she said. “Mr. Harold Seigel has a long-standing, sound and trustworthy reputation in both the diamond and gold industries and has been interviewed by Bloomberg, and others, in the past for his expertise.”
Kaplan said corporate monitors have been appointed to oversee the defendants' companies. She added, ”My clients will continue to cooperate with the corporate monitor and the SEC in their efforts to clear their name and otherwise help account for and protect the assets of their clients.”
An SEC motion for notice of a related case made mention that two of the companies at the center of the alleged scheme, Natural Diamonds and Eagle, have also been named as defendants in Round v. Natural Diamonds Investment Co., a case pending before U.S. District Judge Donald Middlebrooks. Chicago-based attorney Kevin O'Reilly said his clients “Jose Aman, Natural and Eagle have been cooperating with the corporate monitor investigation in the Rounds Matter.” The lawyer, who is also representing Argyle Coin, added, “They will continue to cooperate with the SEC to get these matters resolved amicably.”
On May 14, U.S. District Judge Judge Robin Rosenberg granted the SEC's emergency motion for a temporary restraining order and temporary asset freeze against the defendants. The respondents have been ordered to appear before the court for a show cause hearing on Thursday to argue against a preliminary injunction requested by the agency.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigation Begins After Fatal Biscayne Bay Boating Crash
This Could Have Been a Year of a Federal Court Reckoning for Trump. Judges had Other Ideas
8 minute readMuhammad Ali's Daughter Accused of Ignoring South Florida Judge
Florida Law Firms Brace for Category 5 Hurricane Milton
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 3BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 4GlaxoSmithKline Settles Most Zantac Lawsuits for $2.2B
- 5A&O Shearman Adopts 3-Level Lockstep Pay Model Amid Shift to All-Equity Partnership
Who Got The Work
Blank Rome partner Andrew T. Hambelton has stepped in to defend Fragrancenet.com in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Aug. 29 in New York Southern District Court by the Blakely Law Group, targets the defendants for allegedly selling counterfeit fragrance products. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Lorna G. Schofield, is 1:24-cv-06521, Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co. v. Quester (US) Enterprises, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Davis Polk & Wardwell partners Mari Grace and Edmund Polubinski III have entered appearances for Australia-based Bitcoin-mining company Iris Energy and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Eastern District Court by the Rosen Law Firm, contends that the defendants concealed the inadequacy of the company's site in Childress County, Texas, including it being 'ill-equipped' and unable to operate the company's proprietary design. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Peggy Kuo, is 1:24-cv-07046, Williams-Israel v. Iris Energy Limited et al.
Who Got The Work
Ryan S. Stippich of Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren has entered an appearance for biopharmaceutical company Veru Inc. and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Sept. 30 in Wisconsin Western District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of June Ovadias, accuses the defendant of failing to disclose that small sample sizes and other issues rendered it unlikely that the FDA would grant Emergency Use Authorization for the cancer drug candidate sabizabulin as a potential treatment for COVID-19. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge William M. Conley, is 3:24-cv-00676, Ovadias, June v. Steiner, Mitchell et al.
Who Got The Work
Holland & Knight partners Cynthia A. Gierhart and Thomas Willcox Brooke have entered appearances for Pakistani American Political Action Committee and Rao Kamran Ali in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The action, filed Sept. 24 in District of Columbia District Court by Jackson Walker on behalf of Pakistani American Public Affairs Committee, accuses the defendants of using a mark that's confusingly similar to the plaintiff's 'Pak-Pac' marks without authorization. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Randolph D. Moss, is 1:24-cv-02727, Pakistani American Public Affairs Committee v. Pakistani American Political Action Committee et al.
Who Got The Work
Lauren M. Rosenberg and Yonatan Even of Cravath, Swaine & Moore have stepped in to represent Israel-based Oddity Tech Ltd. in a pending securities class action. The case, filed Aug. 30 in New York Southern District Court by Pomerantz LLP and Holzer & Holzer, contends that the defendant made materially misleading statements regarding the capability of Oddity's AI technology and ongoing civil litigation, resulting in the artifical inflation of the market price of Oddity's securities. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Margaret M. Garnett, is 1:24-cv-06571, Hoare v. Oddity Tech Ltd. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250