Clemency Commission Gets Cash That Could Ease Backlog
Florida lawmakers have agreed to give $750,000 to the Florida Commission on Offender Review to help alleviate a backlog of nearly 24,000 clemency cases wait-listed for review by the Board of Executive Clemency.
May 24, 2019 at 10:17 AM
4 minute read
A Florida commission that helps investigate clemency cases is anticipating an influx of cash that could significantly boost its staffing levels, a “crucial” component to speed up the state's mercy process.
Florida lawmakers have agreed to give $750,000 to the Florida Commission on Offender Review to help alleviate a backlog of nearly 24,000 clemency cases wait-listed for review by the Board of Executive Clemency, comprised of Gov. Ron DeSantis and the Florida Cabinet.
The money is tucked into the $91.1 billion state budget proposed for the upcoming 2019-2020 fiscal year. The budget is pending approval by DeSantis.
If the governor signs off on the spending, the commission wants to hire 15 full-time staffers to help chip away at the unresolved cases, which include applications from felons seeking to have their civil rights restored.
“The additional funds and staff will be crucial in helping the commission process more cases,” Kelly Corder, a commission spokeswoman, said. “It would be more than hundreds, but I can't specify further than that.”
The move to inject more money into the clemency process comes after state lawmakers zeroed out the commission's budget request for $500,000 last year, when former Gov. Rick Scott was at the helm.
“There's been disappointment from many of us over the last several years in the system that was in place with the Cabinet before and how they handled clemency petitions,” Senate Appropriations Chairman Rob Bradley, R-Fleming Island, said in late April.
Bradley was referring to Scott's eight years overseeing the clemency process, which was marred by controversy that began shortly after the Republican governor took office in 2011. Scott, now a U.S. senator, and the Florida Cabinet imposed new clemency rules that made it harder for felons to have their rights restored.
Under the system created by Scott and the Cabinet in 2011, felons must wait five years before applying to have their civil rights restored. Felons who have been convicted of certain violent crimes or sexual offenses must wait at least seven years before seeking a hearing to have their rights restored. That system is still in place.
But with a new governor now in charge, Bradley said legislators approved the money for the upcoming year because they are “encouraged” by how the Board of Executive Clemency now is handling the clemency process.
For example, just three days after DeSantis and the Cabinet members took office in January, the clemency board unanimously pardoned the “Groveland Four,” one of the most-notorious cases from Florida's Jim Crow era in which four young black men were falsely accused of raping a white woman in Lake County.
“We were very encouraged by the new Cabinet and their probably more open-minded approach when considering these types of petitions,” Bradley explained.
Lawmakers approved the commission's initial $500,000 request, and added an extra $250,000. The commission plans to hire the extra full-time employees to help investigate cases, a process that takes place before the clemency board makes final decisions on felons' petitions.
The board has the power to restore felons' rights to own or possess a gun, grant full pardons, reduce fines and adjust sentences.
The board also has the authority to restore felons' civil rights, which include the right to vote, run for office and serve on a jury.
The process of restoring voting rights has changed since Floridians overwhelmingly approved a constitutional amendment that restored voting rights to felons who have completed their sentences. The amendment, which appeared on the November ballot as Amendment 4, excludes murderers and individuals convicted of felony sexual offenses.
But Corder said that passage of the amendment does not necessarily mean the clemency caseload will be dramatically diminished. The board still has to review petitions from felons seeking to have all of their civil rights restored, she said.
“Those applications remain in place, even with Amendment 4,” Corder said. “Someone may still want to run for office or sit on a jury and we will review that.”
Ana Ceballos reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMiami Firm Reaches $1.9M Settlement for Protester's Injuries, Pursues Class Action for Others
COVID-19 Death Suit Against Nursing Home Sent to State Court, 11th Circuit Affirms
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250