Appeals Court Orders Payment in School Bus PIP Dispute
The Second District Court of Appeal said the Lee County School Board and its insurer are responsible for reimbursing State Farm, which shelled out $10,000 for each passenger's care under the state's personal-injury protection insurance system.
May 28, 2019 at 11:36 AM
3 minute read
In a case stemming from a 2014 accident in which a vehicle ran into a Lee County school bus, an appeals court sided with State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. in a dispute about paying medical costs of two injured bus passengers.
A three-judge panel of the Second District Court of Appeal said the Lee County School Board and its insurer, Safety National Casualty Corp., are responsible for reimbursing State Farm, which shelled out $10,000 for each passenger's care under the state's personal-injury protection, or PIP, insurance system.
The injured passengers were insured under a State Farm policy that provided PIP coverage. That led State Farm to file a lawsuit in 2016 seeking reimbursement for the medical costs.
But the school board and Safety National fought the lawsuit, with the school board arguing, in part, that it should not be required to pay because of the state's sovereign immunity laws, which help shield government agencies from liability. Safety National said it did not provide PIP coverage for the bus.
A Lee County circuit judge in 2017, however, ruled in favor of State Farm, and the appeals court agreed Friday. The appeals court pointed to part of the PIP law that includes school buses as “commercial motor vehicles,” which it said makes school-bus owners subject to reimbursing medical expenses.
“State Farm paid PIP benefits to two of its own insureds who were injured while passengers on a school bus owned by the School Board, and pursuant to [a section of state law], it has a statutory right to reimbursement from the School Board as the owner of that commercial motor vehicle and from Safety National as the School Board's insurer,” said the 10-page opinion, written by Judge Daniel Sleet and joined by Judges Darryl Casanueva and Morris Silberman.
Court documents said the accident occurred when a vehicle hit the rear end of a school bus stopped at a traffic light. Friday's ruling did not identify the injured passengers covered under the State Farm policy. But documents filed in Lee County circuit court identified them as Ashley Louis and Dina Louis and said they were minors.
PIP coverage is part of the state's long-standing no-fault insurance system and is designed to pay for accident-related medical expenses up to $10,000. In arguing that it should be shielded from having to reimburse State Farm, the school board cited a 1997 change in state law that exempted school buses from a requirement to carry PIP coverage.
“As clearly stated, the intent of the changes to the no-fault law were to reduce the financial impact of school bus accidents on county school boards, while creating an avenue for parents to receive the full measure of the benefits they paid premiums for to insurers like State Farm,” the board said in a document filed in Lee County circuit court.
Jim Saunders reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTragedy on I-95: Florida Lawsuit Against Horizon Freight System Could Set New Precedent in Crash Cases
2 minute readSecurities Claims Against Lilium N.V. for Electric Plane Production Delays Fail to Take Flight, Federal Judge Holds
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How the Court of Public Opinion Should Factor Into Litigation Strategy
- 2Debevoise Lures Another SDNY Alum, Adding Criminal Division Chief
- 3Cooley Promotes NY Office Leader to Global Litigation Department Chair
- 4What Happens When Lateral Partners’ Guaranteed Compensation Ends?
- 5Tuesday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250