Appeals Court Orders Payment in School Bus PIP Dispute
The Second District Court of Appeal said the Lee County School Board and its insurer are responsible for reimbursing State Farm, which shelled out $10,000 for each passenger's care under the state's personal-injury protection insurance system.
May 28, 2019 at 11:36 AM
3 minute read
In a case stemming from a 2014 accident in which a vehicle ran into a Lee County school bus, an appeals court sided with State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. in a dispute about paying medical costs of two injured bus passengers.
A three-judge panel of the Second District Court of Appeal said the Lee County School Board and its insurer, Safety National Casualty Corp., are responsible for reimbursing State Farm, which shelled out $10,000 for each passenger's care under the state's personal-injury protection, or PIP, insurance system.
The injured passengers were insured under a State Farm policy that provided PIP coverage. That led State Farm to file a lawsuit in 2016 seeking reimbursement for the medical costs.
But the school board and Safety National fought the lawsuit, with the school board arguing, in part, that it should not be required to pay because of the state's sovereign immunity laws, which help shield government agencies from liability. Safety National said it did not provide PIP coverage for the bus.
A Lee County circuit judge in 2017, however, ruled in favor of State Farm, and the appeals court agreed Friday. The appeals court pointed to part of the PIP law that includes school buses as “commercial motor vehicles,” which it said makes school-bus owners subject to reimbursing medical expenses.
“State Farm paid PIP benefits to two of its own insureds who were injured while passengers on a school bus owned by the School Board, and pursuant to [a section of state law], it has a statutory right to reimbursement from the School Board as the owner of that commercial motor vehicle and from Safety National as the School Board's insurer,” said the 10-page opinion, written by Judge Daniel Sleet and joined by Judges Darryl Casanueva and Morris Silberman.
Court documents said the accident occurred when a vehicle hit the rear end of a school bus stopped at a traffic light. Friday's ruling did not identify the injured passengers covered under the State Farm policy. But documents filed in Lee County circuit court identified them as Ashley Louis and Dina Louis and said they were minors.
PIP coverage is part of the state's long-standing no-fault insurance system and is designed to pay for accident-related medical expenses up to $10,000. In arguing that it should be shielded from having to reimburse State Farm, the school board cited a 1997 change in state law that exempted school buses from a requirement to carry PIP coverage.
“As clearly stated, the intent of the changes to the no-fault law were to reduce the financial impact of school bus accidents on county school boards, while creating an avenue for parents to receive the full measure of the benefits they paid premiums for to insurers like State Farm,” the board said in a document filed in Lee County circuit court.
Jim Saunders reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecurities Claims Against Lilium N.V. for Electric Plane Production Delays Fail to Take Flight, Federal Judge Holds
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250