Brothers Sentenced for Shortchanging Employees on Public Housing Work
Attorneys for brothers Javier Estepa and Diego Estepa Vasquez say they will appeal for shorter sentences.
May 29, 2019 at 05:27 PM
4 minute read
Two South Florida construction company executives will serve more than three years in federal prison for shortchanging their workers and lowballing public housing project bids.
Brothers Javier Estepa and Diego Alejandro Estepa Vasquez were accused of defrauding Miami-Dade County to land more contracts for repairs and renovation work.
U.S. District Judge Ursula Ungaro in Miami sentenced Estepa to four years and four months in prison and Estepa Vasquez to three years and five months.
Attorneys for Estepa, 48, and Estepa Vasquez, 37, said they will fight for shorter sentences on appeal, arguing the judge incorrectly calculated the monetary loss in the fraud, which drives the sentencing guidelines.
The brothers were indicted for allegedly undercounting the number of employees needed to work on projects and the hours worked.
The underestimates allowed them to artificially deflate workers' compensation insurance premiums, payroll taxes and other costs, which in turn allowed them to artificially deflate their bids, according to a second superseding indictment.
The shortcuts gave them a leg up because the county Department of Public Housing and Community Development, which administers federal Section 8 and public housing funds, hires contractors with the lowest bids as long as they meet contract conditions and terms.
The trial revealed the brothers underpaid workers and didn't pay overtime as required by the Davis–Bacon Act. The 1931 law mandates workers on federally funded projects be paid at least the local prevailing wages.
The brothers also hired subcontractors despite telling the county they wouldn't and paid them a flat rate instead of an hourly wage, federal prosecutors charged.
Estepa of Davie and Estepa Vasquez of Boca Raton were charged with running the scheme from June 2014 to December 2016 as heads of Hialeah Gardens-based Aaron Construction Group Inc. The county transferred more than $3.9 million to the company where Estepa was president and Estepa Vasquez was vice president.
The brothers also were accused presenting false documents to county officials midway or at the end of projects to support their fraud.
The jury in February convicted both of wire fraud conspiracy and three counts of wire fraud. The jury also found Estepa guilty of three counts of false statements and Estepa Vasquez of one count of false statement. Estepa was acquitted of witness tampering.
Ungaro in April denied motions for acquittal and a new trial.
In court filings, defense attorneys portrayed Estepa and Estepa Vasquez as family men without prior criminal records. They worked hard, treated their employees with respect, cared for their community — they removed downed trees and branches in Miami's Overtown neighborhood the day after Hurricane Irma — and received letters of support from their staff and community.
Estepa lost his general contractor's license while Estepa Vasquez has had problems pursuing a flower business because of the uncertainty facing him, their attorneys wrote in sentencing memorandums filed in May.
Estepa didn't deny or downplay his conviction, but his attorney, Neil Taylor, sought to put it in context. While Estepa was convicted of shortchanging workers, many of his workers were happy to have a job.
“In today's climate and in particular Miami-Dade County, in return for a steady job and paycheck, many, many people are only too happy to sign on. Is it wrong? Yes. Is it a common practice? Absolutely,” Taylor of the Law Offices of Neil G. Taylor in Coral Gables wrote in the May 3 sentencing memo.
Appeals will dispute the loss calculation of $1.7 million, said Estepa Vasquez's attorney, Susy Ribero-Ayala of Susy Ribero-Ayala Law in Coral Gables.
The attorneys argued the dollar amount shouldn't be based on the company's gain but on the loss to underpaid workers. They said the amount should be based on the gain only if there's no other reasonable way to calculate it.
“It's our position that loss can be reasonably determined” by how much each worker was underpaid, Taylor said.
The government plans to file a restitution motion for $34,000 for the workers, Taylor added.
Related stories:
Conviction for 2 South Floridians Accused of Lowballing Public Housing Bids
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250