Broward Agencies Blame Each Other for Murder Suspect's Inadvertent Release From Custody
Comments from the Broward State Attorney's Office and the Broward Sheriff's Office have deflected responsibility for the wrongful release of Eric Vail from police custody on Thursday. Vail, who is facing first-degree murder charges, has received legal representation from the Public Defender's Office.
June 04, 2019 at 04:22 PM
5 minute read
There's some finger pointing in the political fallout of a murder suspect's release from police custody in Broward County.
On Tuesday afternoon Broward State Attorney's Office public information officer Paula McMahon released a statement asserting prosecutors followed the proper procedures in notifying the Broward Sheriff's Office and the Broward Clerk of Courts that defendant Eric Vail was still facing a first-degree murder charge. Vail, who has been accused of murdering Wadarius Harris in October 2018, was indicted for second-degree murder before a grand jury opted to upgrade the charges in April. He was mistakenly released from jail on Thursday after it was learned the second-degree murder charges against him had been dismissed.
Although the second-degree murder indictment was dismissed, Vail was supposed to be held to stand trial for the first-degree murder charge.
McMahon said a review of public records affirmed the Broward State Attorney's Office communicated that “Eric Vail still had a pending first-degree murder charge active after the second-degree murder charge was dropped.”
“For clarity, it is common for prosecutors to file a second-degree murder charge to ensure a defendant is jailed while an investigation is pending and prior to taking the case to the grand jury,” she said, noting a grand jury has to approve first-degree murder indictments. “It is the responsibility of the Broward Clerk of Courts office to notify the Broward Sheriff's Office of new court filings, but our prosecutors and staff also sent notifications to both the clerk of courts and the sheriff's office that the first-degree murder — with a no-bond hold — was still pending against Vail.”
McMahon also said prosecutors had reached out directly to the sheriff's office to inform them of the new charges pressed against Vail, and added prosecutors received a receipt indicating “the sheriff's office took some action after receiving the file from us.”
“The State Attorney's Office has a tracking/auditing system in place on this program,” she wrote. “If our office receives no response from the sheriff's office computer server within two hours, our information technology department receives an email notification. As of today, we have received no such emails for all of 2019.”
Broward Sheriff's Office senior public information officer Keyla Concepción told the Daily Business Review the department “is not in possession of the documentation notifying us he was to be held on another charge” on Tuesday. In a statement released Monday, the law enforcement office laid the blame for the mistake with “an ongoing communication issue within the court system” and asserted their detention deputies are only responsible for the care and custody of inmates.
“It is the responsibility of the Broward County Clerk of Courts to distribute official documentation between all the essential parties about court proceedings, to include communications involving inmates in custody,” the statement said. “At the time Vail was scheduled for release, the jail had not received any documentation from the Clerk of Courts stating the subject was to remain in custody to face another charge.”
Dian Diaz, chief operating officer with the Broward County Clerk of Courts, provided the Daily Business Review with a statement disputing the claims of the BSO after being reached for comment on Tuesday.
“In order to release a prisoner from confinement, a directive from the judiciary is required,” the statement read, adding Vail's case does not contain any instructions concerning his release. The statement noted that a case docket displaying Vail's first-degree charge was sent to the sheriff's office and noted hearings following his most recent indictment are “void of any instruction that Mr. Vail should be released from the care, custody and control of the Broward Sheriff's Office on the first degree murder charge.”
Vail is being represented by attorney Erin Veit with the Broward Public Defender's Office. The head of the department, Howard Finkelstein, said “nobody gets in or out of that jail without the sheriff's permission, period.”
“Whether it has been complicated because we have an incompetent clerk as well as an incompetent jailer, that I don't know,” he said. “But the joke in my office today is it's better to have an incompetent jailer than a good public defender some days.”
Finkelstein added, “If he contacts us we'll tell him to surrender himself, but its not like he was illegally released, he was wrongfully released.” The attorney said his biggest concern was “no one from the sheriff's office informed the public for days.”
“This is not something that should be kept a secret, because what that says is we're protecting our political asses rather than the community,” Finkelstein said.
Vail had not been apprehended as of press time on Tuesday afternoon.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250