10-Year Disbarment Considered for Miami Lawyer Accused of Targeting Opposing Counsel
The two sides clashed over whether the reccommended 10-year disbarment for Miami attorney Jose Maria Herrera was too harsh or fair punishment for his alleged involvement in filing frivolous lawsuits against a rival law firm.
June 05, 2019 at 03:07 PM
4 minute read
The Florida Supreme Court Wednesday heard oral arguments supporting and opposing 10-year disbarment for Miami attorney Jose Maria Herrera over allegations he helped file frivolous lawsuits and disciplinary proceedings against rival law firm Lewis Tein and its attorneys.
Herrera's lawyer, Herman J. Russomanno III, argued the sanction was unprecedented and too severe, while Florida Bar counsel Jennifer R. Falcone claimed it was fitting for “extremely serious misconduct.”
The Florida Bar filed its complaint against Herrera in July 2016, accusing him of taking part in “abusive litigation” against Guy Lewis, Michael Tein and their Miami firm.
The alleged abuse stemmed from a Miami wrongful death case, in which Herrera helped represent members of the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida — Jimmy Bert and his daughter Tammy Billie — who were sued in 2000 after a crash caused by drunken driving. The plaintiff won a $2.9 million judgment, and extensive post-trial litigation ensued.
Lewis and Tein — with Dexter Lehtinen of Lehtinen Schultz Riedi Catalano De la Fuente — handled the tribe's affairs, until new counsel Bernardo Roman III took over in 2010.
Roman then filed numerous suits and motions alleging that Lewis Tein had billed the tribe for millions of dollars in “fictitious, excessive, exorbitant and unsubstantiated legal fees,” according to court-appointed referee, Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Dava Tunis.
The Florida Supreme Court permanently disbarred Roman, the alleged ringleader of the effort, in 2018, after the referee found him guilty of 55 charges, including eight counts of counseling or assisting a client in criminal or fraudulent behavior.
The claims in those lawsuits, which played out over six years in federal and state courts, were found to be “wholly frivolous and without any legal merit,” according to the referee's report, which said Lewis and Tein were professionally and personally devastated by the ordeal. Tunis recommended temporary disbarment for Herrera, finding him guilty of violating 18 violations of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar.
Related story: Disbarment Recommended for 2 South Florida Lawyers
Defense lawyer Russomanno asked the court to consider a 90 to 91-day suspension and probation, arguing 10 years isn't supported by facts or case law. Russomanno said Herrera has no history of discipline or bar complaints in his 33 years of practice, has shown remorse and was going through family health problems at the time. Several character witnesses, including former Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Rosa Rodriguez, Miami-Dade City Attorney Victoria Mendez and lawyer Benedict Kuehne, had also vouched for Herrera.
A 10-year disbarment in this case, Russomannno claimed, was not backed up by case law.
“This is not the type of case, like a Rothstein or, like recently with Jeremy Alters, where there was a million dollars taken from the trust account, where disbarment was warranted by this court,” Russomanno said. “This is not that case.”
Russomanno also claimed that complainant Tien had helped draft the bar's report, which went to the referee and ultimately became part of her findings. According to Falcone, the complainant didn't have any control over the investigation but simply recounted for the court what had happened at the trial and in the case.
Tunis found that Herrera had manufactured false testimony through his client and intentionally thwarted discovery in the disciplinary phase “for as long as possible” of a statement from Lewis Tein and the courts supporting the tribe's position.
The way Falcone saw it, that demonstrated Herrera's inability to be rehabilitated.
“[The referee] accused [Herrera], essentially, of creating a kangaroo court situation because even after everything that had been said and done, he still was withholding evidence,” Falcone said.
Justices Barbara Lagoa and Robert Luck interjected to ask about one of Hererra's alleged misrepresentations about a federal trial he'd attended. While Hererra testified he went to represent the interest of his client, Billie, it turned out that he'd billed the tribe for his time.
The court has yet to rule.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
3 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readDisbarred Attorney Alleges ADA Violations in Lawsuit Against Miami-Dade Judges
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1$1.9M Settlement Approved in Class Suit Over Vacant Property Fees
- 2Former Wamco Exec Charged With $600M 'Cherry-Picking' Fraud
- 3Stock Trading App Robinhood Hit With Privacy Class Action 1 Month After Alleged Data Breach
- 4NY High Court Returns Fired Priest's Discrimination Claim to State Agency
- 5Digging Deep to Mitigate Risk in Lithium Mine Venture Wins GM Legal Department of the Year Award
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250