Florida Supreme Court Reprimands Broward Judge for Losing Temper in Trial
"We all recognize that this is a sad day for you," Chief Justice Charles T. Canady told Broward Circuit Judge Dennis D. Bailey. "It is also a sad day for us and for the entire state judiciary."
June 05, 2019 at 11:21 AM
3 minute read
The Florida Supreme Court chastised Broward Circuit Judge Dennis D. Bailey Wednesday morning for mistreating two attorneys in a felony criminal trial.
Chief Justice Charles T. Canady called it a “lapse” as he reprimanded Bailey for violating five canons of the Code of Judicial Conduct.
“We all recognize that this is a sad day for you,” Canady began. “It is also a sad day for us and for the entire state judiciary.”
Canady told Bailey the court takes its reprimands very seriously as “they send a message to all Florida judges that we will not wink at misconduct.” He added that the court understands how stressful it can be to manage “the give and take of an adversarial courtroom” but implored Bailey to exercise self control.
“Few things are more corrosive of public respect for the judiciary than the conduct of judges who do not exercise self control but intemperately abuse lawyers and litigants,” Canady said.
The Judicial Qualifications Commission brought ethics charges against Bailey in December 2018, accusing him of being intemperate with Fort Lauderdale public defenders Gustavo Javier Martinez and James Allen Foretich when presiding over State v. Genesis Espejo.
The JQC's investigative panel found Bailey got frustrated with the lawyers as they tried to argue the same objection in a sidebar conference.
“When one of the attorneys tried to help his colleague articulate a point during the sidebar, Judge Bailey repeatedly attempted to quiet him by saying, 'One lawyer at a time,' 'Only one lawyer argues,' followed shortly thereafter by, 'You have a hard time understanding me? Two lawyers can't argue one argument,' ” JQC Chair Krista Marx wrote in her findings.
Bailey later described the conversation as “white noise” to investigators, who found the judge inappropriately tried to have one lawyer physically removed before the jury and wrongly denied a motion for disqualification. According to the high court justices, there was no standing order that only one attorney per side could argue a point.
Bailey agreed to a public reprimand in a December 2018 stipulation, which said he's undergoing stress management courses, “so that in the future he is better equipped to handle stressful situations, and does not resort to knee-jerk reactions.”
After the reprimand, Bailey thanked the judges and left the courtroom.
Bailey's lawyer, Michael E. Dutko of Dutko & Kroll in Fort Lauderdale, said Bailey has accepted responsibility for his actions.
“[Bailey] has anxiously awaited receiving this public reprimand before the Florida Supreme Court, and now looks forward to moving ahead and being the best judge he can be, and continuing to serve the citizens of Broward County with honor and integrity. “
Click here to watch the video
Related stories:
Broward Judge in Hot Seat Over Alleged Mistreatment of Attorneys
Miami-Dade Judge Accepts 90-Day Suspension After 3rd Sanction Proposal
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
3 minute readMiami-Dade Litigation Over $1.7 Million Brazilian Sugar Deal Faces Turning Point
3 minute readMeta agrees to pay $25 million to settle lawsuit from Trump after Jan. 6 suspension
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Securities Action Targeting Polestar Alleges Mistakes in SEC Filings
- 2Conspiracy Suits Against Quinn Emanuel, Roc Nation Moved to Federal District Court
- 3'Knowledge of Mismatch:' Fed Judge Offers Guidance on How to Hold Banks Accountable for Erroneous Transfers
- 4PAGA Claims Must Now Be 'Headed'
- 5Million-Dollar Verdict: Broward Jury Sides With Small Business
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250