South Florida Stem Cell Clinic, Federal Prosecutors Ordered to Hash Out Details of Injunction
U.S. District Judge Ursula Ungaro ordered the parties to convene and share details of their agreement by Friday, June 14. On Monday Ungaro granted the federal government's motion for summary judgment against the experimental health care provider.
June 07, 2019 at 05:07 PM
4 minute read
A federal judge in the Southern District of Florida has ordered a South Florida stem cell clinic to discontinue one of its treatments and convene with prosecutors to agree on the parameters of a permanent injunction issued against it.
On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Ursula Ungaro approved U.S. Stem Cell Inc.'s motion to arrange for a meeting with the United States Food and Drug Administration on the scope of the injunction imposed against the experimental health care company. Ungaro had ordered the injunction on the previous day when she granted the federal agency's motion for summary judgment against the stem cell care provider and defendants Theodore Gradel and Dr. Kristin Comella.
Although Ungaro concurred with the defendants that “a mutually agreed upon injunction would be desirable,” she stressed that the conditions of the injunction against them still stand through the June 14 deadline for an agreement.
“The court will not permit defendants to use this time as a grace period to continue to violate the [Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act],” she said. “Accordingly, until an injunction is entered by this court, defendants are prohibited from selling and/or engaging in any [stromal vascular fraction] therapy or other activities to be regulated by the FDA.”
The stromal vascular fraction therapy is at the center of the dispute between U.S. Stem Cell and the FDA. The department filed a complaint against the company in May 2018 alleging the company was improperly using SVF therapy — wherein a liposuction is performed to produce adipose that can be processed to purportedly heal damaged tissue elsewhere in the body —without proper FDA approval or oversight.
“Defendants are well aware that the SVF product is subject to regulation as a drug and biological product … and that their conduct violates the law and could lead to regulatory action,” the suit said. The complaint also noted patients who'd undergone the procedure were left blind.
Read the court's order issuing an injunction:
Ungaro's order granting the prosecutors' motion for summary judgment held SVF therapy is subject to FDA regulation despite the defendants' objections. She also agreed with the FDA that “there is a reasonable likelihood that Defendants will continue to violate the FDCA” as U.S. Stem Cell “continuously performed the SVF therapy in noncompliance” with warning letters from the federal agency.
In a press release issued by the department, Dr. Peter Marks, director of the FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, called the ruling “a victory for the FDA's work to stop these bad actors and to protect patients.”
“We are committed to continuing to pursue actions against those who put patients in harm's way by marketing unapproved stem cell products that skirt [the] FDA's regulations and federal law,” he said.
U.S. Stem Cell provided the Daily Business Review with a statement expressing disappointment with the court's order.
“While we believe there is substantial evidence to prove the efficacy of this protocol, we must immediately comply with the court as we review the decision,” the statement said. “U.S. Stem Cell Inc. and U.S. Stem Cell Clinic will continue to operate business as usual, but no longer offers the adipose/SVF procedure. We're hopeful the FDA will keep striving to work with the industry to establish clarity around life-saving innovations in regenerative medicine.”
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250