Multimillion-Dollar Class Action Filed Against Florida Health Insurers for Alleged Fraud
A complaint in the Southern District of Florida alleged Tampa-based companies Health Insurance Innovations and Health Plan Intermediaries Holdings schemed to deceive customers about their products. The suit was filed by attorneys Jason Kellogg and Jason Doss.
June 10, 2019 at 04:24 PM
5 minute read
A federal class action lawsuit has accused two Tampa-based health care companies of defrauding customers out of millions of dollars by misrepresenting the benefits of their insurance policies.
A complaint filed in the Southern District of Florida on Friday named Health Insurance Innovations Inc. and Health Plan Intermediaries Holdings LLC as defendants in a four-count lawsuit. The charges against the businesses include allegations of racketeering as well as aiding and abetting fraud in addition to unjust enrichment.
The plaintiffs, Elizabeth Belin and Christopher Mitchell, are being represented by attorneys Jason Kellogg and Jason Doss. According to the attorneys, the defendants unlawfully led customers to believe that the limited-benefit indemnity and medical discount plans they were offering provided the full range of medical benefits included with traditional health insurance. Kellogg, a partner with Levine Kellogg Lehman Schneider + Grossman in Miami, said the class action began with a lawsuit against South Florida company Simple Health Plans in October 2018 by the Federal Trade Commission.
“The Tampa companies … create insurance products — but it's not major medical insurance — and they sell it through third-party distributors,” he said, noting Simple Health had been one such business partner of Health Insurance Innovations Inc. and Health Plan Intermediaries Holdings. Kellogg said Simple Health would use a script to mislead customers regarding the nature of Health Insurance Innovations plans.
“If you wanted a boots-and-suspenders-type thing, you could buy this product, in case you had an event where you had to come up with a deductible,” Kellogg said. The attorney added although these plans were “not meant to cover catastrophic health injuries,” Simple Health had been advertising them as if they did. Friday's complaint alleges Health Insurance Innovations Inc. and Health Plan Intermediaries Holdings loaned Simple Health “millions of dollars to fund its operations,” in addition to training its customer service agents and providing the company with “extremely generous commissions.” The lawsuit contends Health Insurance Innovations “paid about $180 million in commissions to Simple Health” between 2014 and October 2018.
Read the class action complaint:
Doss, who practices in Atlanta as the owner of the Doss Firm, said companies such as Health Insurance Innovations and Simple Heath are victimizing the very people the Affordable Care Act had been designed to protect.
“People who don't have good health care through their employer are being targeted all over the country,” he said. “Consumers are being misled as to what the features of their product are.”
The named plaintiffs only discovered the true extent of their benefits once hospitals informed them of how much they owed for necessary medical procedures, attorneys said.
Kellogg told the Daily Business Review the class comprises consumers around the U.S. who purchased Health Insurance Innovations coverage through Simple Health between 2013 and 2018. The attorney said he and Doss believe roughly half a million customers purchased a Health Insurance Innovations plan during the company's partnership with Simple Health.
Noting the $180 million given to Simple Health by Health Insurance Innovations, the attorneys said they are hoping to award victims of the alleged scheme in part with the premiums and fees they had to pay on medical bills. Doss noted the defendants reaped “hundreds of millions” in profit, and any class action award will be contingent on the extent of the purported fraud and the damages incurred by class members.
No attorney has entered an appearance for the defense. Garry O'Donnell, with Greenspoon Marder's Boca Raton office, has represented the defendants on past matters, but did not respond to requests for comment by press time.
Doss and Kellogg suggest they expect to learn more about the reach and impact of the alleged scheme during the discovery period.
“It may came to light that Health Insurance Innovations used other distribution channels other than Simple Health to perpetuate this fraudulent scheme,” Doss said. “We've given ourselves leeway in the complaint to broaden the scope.”
Kellogg said, “We know Simple Health was the largest, but if there are others …”
Doss finished for him: “We'll find out.”
Read the complaint:
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Trending Stories
- 1Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 2Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 3Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
- 4UN Treaty Enacting Cybercrime Standards Likely to Face Headwinds in US, Other Countries
- 5Clark Hill Acquires L&E Boutique in Mexico City, Adding 5 Lawyers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250