11th Circuit Upholds Sentencing of Man Behind Miami Beach Student Sex Trafficking
The federal appeals court affirmed the 30-year prison sentence given to defendant Jeffrey Cooper by Chief U.S. District Judge K. Michael Moore. Cooper's appeal contended the prosecution acted improperly and submitted insufficient evidence to convict him on charges of sex trafficking.
June 11, 2019 at 03:38 PM
3 minute read
A federal appeals court has ruled against a Miami Beach man seeking to overturn a 30-year prison sentence for sex trafficking and wire fraud.
On Monday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued an opinion affirming defendant Jeffrey Cooper's November 2016 conviction in the Southern District of Florida.
Cooper was found guilty by a jury on 11 criminal counts for operating a prostitution ring based at the Bayshore Yacht and Tennis Club in Miami Beach from at least July 2010 through his May 2016 arrest. Authorities alleged he adopted an online pseudonym, Dr. Janardana Dasa, and enticed young women from Kazakhstan to obtain visas and travel to Miami Beach in order to work in a clerical capacity for his purported yoga business. Upon arrival the women learned there was no yoga studio and were pressured by Cooper into giving sensual massages and having intercourse with clients.
“Cooper suggested that if the students refused, they would lose their work, their pay and their housing,” the appellate court's opinion said.
After being sentenced to a 30-year imprisonment by Chief U.S. District Judge K. Michael Moore in April 2017, Cooper appealed on the grounds that errors had been made in the submission of evidence. The defendant also argued the opposing counsel had “impugned [his] character” by referring to him as a “two-faced fraud” and “phony” during opening remarks.
The appeals court found even if the errors singled out by Cooper had occurred, “none provides a basis for reversal or new trial” and emphasized “the properly admitted evidence overwhelmingly established Cooper's guilt.” Although the court conceded some issues raised by Cooper warranted their input — including the admittance of testimony from a law enforcement officer including statements made by clients visiting the Bayshore Yacht and Tennis Club for sexual services — “any error in admitting them was, however, harmless.”
“The government introduced substantial evidence showing that Cooper used the apartments for his business, including testimony by Cooper's employees,” the opinion said. “Any error 'did not contribute to the verdict obtained,' beyond a reasonable doubt.”
Read the Eleventh Circuit's opinion:
The opinion also vindicated the prosecution of any misconduct in their characterization of Cooper as a “two-faced fraud” and “phony.”
“The government introduced evidence that Cooper used a fake name to run his prostitution business and used false pretenses to recruit the Kazakhstani students to come to Miami to work for him in his prostitution business,” the opinion said. “The prosecutor's statement was neither improper nor so pronounced and persistent that it permeate[d] the entire atmosphere of the trial.'”
The U.S. Attorney's Office declined to provide a statement on the ruling. Miami attorney Gennaro Cariglio Jr. represented Cooper in the Southern District of Florida as well as the Eleventh Circuit. A receptionist with Cariglio's law office told the Daily Business Review he was not interested in commenting, and Cariglio did not respond to an email inquiry by press time.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250